To improve the anti-interference ability of maglev trains, a dynamic model of the high-speed maglev train with a nonlinear suspension controller for the guideway system is proposed in this paper. Based on the nonlinear characteristics of the magnetic suspension system, a nonlinear decoupling controller is designed using the feedback linearization theory. Then, a high-speed maglev train model is refined with a guideway coupling system, consisting of a maglev train simulated as a multi-body dynamics model with 537 degrees of freedom and a spatial finite element model of the guideway. Taking the Shanghai high-speed maglev train as an example, the correctness of the computational model is verified by comparing the modeling results with field measurement data, and the control effectiveness of the nonlinear controllers and the traditional PD controllers is compared considering different train speeds and disturbance forces. The results show that the suspension gap under the decoupling control is smaller than that under the PD control during the train operations. Under the same disturbance force, the decoupling control exhibits better control performance than the PD control. The variation amplitudes of the magnetic pole gaps are generally linearly related to the disturbance force.
ChengXChengB-XDengS, et al. (2020) State-feedback decoupling control of 5-DOF magnetic bearings based on α-order inverse system. Mechatronics68: 102358.
2.
ChinCSWheelerC (2013) Sliding-mode control of an electromagnetic actuated conveyance system using contactless sensing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics60(11): 5315–5324.
3.
FengYZhaoCBaiZ, et al. (2023) A modified electromagnetic force calculation method has high accuracy and applicability for EMS maglev vehicle dynamics simulation. ISA Transactions31: 101050.
4.
GongZDingLLiS, et al. (2021) Payload-agnostic decoupling and hybrid vibration isolation control for a maglev platform with redundant actuation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing146: 106985.
5.
HeGLiJCuiP (2015) Decoupling control design for the module suspension control system in maglev train. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2015: 1–13.
6.
JayawantBVSinhaPK (1977) Low-speed vehicle dynamics and ride quality using controlled D.C. electromagnets. Automatica13(6): 605–610.
7.
JooSJSeoJH (2002) Design and analysis of the nonlinear feedback linearizing control for an electromagnetic suspension system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology5(1): 135–144.
8.
KhalilHK (1993) Robust servomechanism output feedback controllers for a class of feedback linearizable systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes26(2): 149–152.
9.
KimKJHanJBHanHS, et al. (2015) Coupled vibration analysis of Maglev vehicle-guideway while standing still or moving at low speeds. Vehicle System Dynamics53(4): 587–601.
10.
LengPLiYZhouD, et al. (2019) Decoupling control of maglev train based on feedback linearization. IEEE Access7: 130352–130362.
11.
LiJHLiJ (2013) Nonlinear module control of maglev levitation system based on feedback linearization. Applied Mechanics and Materials274: 550–554.
12.
LiZHaoQGaoF, et al. (2019) Nonlinear decoupling control of two-terminal MMC-HVDC based on feedback linearization. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery34(1): 376–386.
13.
LiangXJiangTHongY, et al. (2020) Vibration response analysis of simply supported box girder bridge-maglev train in accelerated test of changsha maglev express. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2020: 9563747. doi: 10.1155/2020/9563747
14.
NidyaMVMijaSJJacobJ (2022) Feedback-linearization based robust relatively optimal trajectory tracking controller for 3-DOF helicopter. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal31: 101050.
15.
MeisingerR (1975) Control systems for flexible maglev vehicles riding over flexible guideways. Vehicle System Dynamics4(2–3): 200–202.
16.
MuraiM (2008) Maglev train HSST is now on commercial operation as 「LINIMO. Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers111(1075): 472–473.
17.
RubioJDJLughoferEPieperJ, et al. (2021) Adapting H-infinity controller for the desired reference tracking of the sphere position in the maglev process. Information Sciences569: 669–686.
18.
SainDSwainSKKumarT, et al. (2018) Robust 2-DOF FOPID controller design for maglev system using jaya algorithm. IETE Journal of Research66(3): 414–426.
19.
ShiJWangY-J (2010) Dynamic response analysis of single-span guideway caused by high speed maglev train. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures8: 213–228.
20.
ShiJWeiQZhaoY (2007) Analysis of dynamic response of the high-speed EMS maglev vehicle/guideway coupling system with random irregularity. Vehicle System Dynamics45(12): 1077–1095.
21.
ShiJFangW-SWangY-JZhaoY (2014) Measurements and analysis of track irregularities on high speed maglev lines. Journal of Zhejiang University - Science15(6): 385-394.
22.
SuXXuYYangX (2022) Neural network adaptive sliding mode control without overestimation for a maglev system. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing168: 108661.
23.
SunYXuJLinG, et al. (2022) RBF neural network-based supervisor control for maglev vehicles on an elastic track with network time delay. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics18(1): 509–519.
24.
WangZLXuYLLiGQ, et al. (2018) Modelling and validation of coupled high-speed maglev train-and-viaduct systems considering support flexibility. Vehicle System Dynamics57(2): 161–191.
25.
WangDLiXLiangL, et al. (2020) Dynamic interaction analysis of bridges induced by a low-to-medium–speed maglev train. Journal of Vibration and Control26(21–22): 2013–2025.
26.
WangLBuXHuP, et al. (2023) Dynamic reliability analysis of running safety and stability of a high-speed maglev train on a guideway bridge. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics24: 1–41.
27.
XiangHTianXLiY, et al. (2022) Dynamic interaction analysis of high-speed maglev train and guideway with a control loop failure. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics22(10): 2241012.
28.
XuCLuoHGanX, et al. (2023) Research on coupled vibrations between the low-to-medium speed maglev train and a long-span continuous beam bridge. Structures56: 104927.
29.
YauJD (2010) Aerodynamic vibrations of a maglev vehicle running on flexible guideways under oncoming wind actions. Journal of Sound and Vibration329(10): 1743–1759.
30.
ZhaiMHaoALiX, et al. (2019a) Research on the active guidance control system in high speed maglev train. IEEE Access7: 741–752.
31.
ZhaiWHanZChenZ, et al. (2019b) Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Vehicle System Dynamics57(7): 984–1027.
32.
ZhangLHuangJ (2019) Dynamic interaction analysis of the high-speed maglev vehicle/guideway system based on a field measurement and model updating method. Engineering Structures180: 1–17.
33.
ZhangPYuZ (2023) Random vibration analysis of the maglev vehicle-guideway system using a probability density evolution method with uncertain parameters. Structures48: 346–359.
34.
ZhangWLiJZhangK, et al. (2013) Decoupling suspension controller based on magnetic flux feedback. TheScientificWorldJournal2013: 956790–956798.
35.
ZhangTZhouDLiJ, et al. (2022) Research on magnetic suspension control scheme based on feedback linearization under low track stiffness. Machines10(8): 692.
36.
ZhangTJiangSShenD, et al. (2023) Adaptive finite-time fuzzy control for hybrid levitation system of maglev trains with active anti-lock constraints. Journal of the Franklin Institute360(4): 2635–2659.
37.
ZhaoCFZhaiWM (2002) Maglev vehicle/guideway vertical random response and ride quality. Vehicle System Dynamics38(3): 185–210.
38.
ZhouDYuPWangL, et al. (2017) An adaptive vibration control method to suppress the vibration of the maglev train caused by track irregularities. Journal of Sound and Vibration408: 331–350.
