The fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)-steel composite tubed (F-STC) column is characterized by high strength and deformability as well as the tube corrosion resistance provided by the FRP. This study aims to find a suitable analytical model for F-STC columns, based on the existing analytical models for confined concrete columns where each typically consists of the stress–strain relationship of actively confined concrete, a lateral strain equation, and the confining stress. A database of 66 tests (61 reported plus 5 added) is established and used to examine the existing analytical models. However, existing models fail to predict the initial stiffness of F-STC columns with lower diameter-to-thickness ratio of steel tube and the correct development of tube stresses. To this end, an incoordination coefficient of axial strains is proposed to account for the different axial strains between the steel tube and concrete. Lastly, after a close examination on the existing analytical models, a modified Teng’s model is proposed. The results predicted by the proposed analytical model generally match well with the test results of F-STC columns.
AttardMMSetungeS (1996) Stress-strain relationship of confined and unconfined concrete. ACI Materials Journal93(5): 432–442.
2.
BaltayPGjelsvikA (1990) Coefficient of friction for steel on concrete at high normal stress. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering22(1): 461–549. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1990)2:1(46).
3.
CaiZWangDSmithST, et al. (2016) Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of GFRP-wrapped thin-walled steel tube confined RC columns. Engineering Structures110: 269–280. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.043.
4.
CheYWangQLShaoYB (2012) Compressive performances of the concrete filled circular CFRP-steel tube (C-CFRP-CFST). Advanced Steel Construction8(4): 331–358. DOI: 10.18057/IJASC.2012.8.4.2.
5.
ChoiKKXiaoY (2010) Analytical model of circular CFRP confined concrete-filled steel tubular columns under axial compression. Journal of Composites for Construction14(1): 125–133. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000056.
6.
DingFXLuDRBaiY, et al. (2018) Behaviour of CFRP-confined concrete-filled circular steel tube stub columns under axial loading. Thin-Walled Structures125: 107–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.015.
7.
DongCXKwanAKHHoJCM (2015) A constitutive model for predicting the lateral strain of confined concrete. Engineering Structures91: 155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.014.
8.
DongCXKwanAKHHoJCM (2016) Axial and lateral stress-strain model for concrete-filled steel tubes with FRP jackets. Engineering Structures126: 365–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.07.059.
9.
GuoYLiuJPMiaoYJ, et al. (2017) Experimental study on axial behavior of circular CFRP-steel composite tube confined concrete stub columns. Engineering Mechanics34(6): 41–50. (In Chinese).
10.
GuoYXuTXLiuJP (2019) Experimental study and analysis on axial behavior of circular CFRP-steel composite tubed high-strength concrete stub columns. Journal of Building Structures40(5): 124–131. (In Chinese).
11.
HuYMYuTTengJG (2011) FRP-confined circular concrete-filled thin steel tubes under axial compression. Journal of Composites for Construction15(5): 850–860. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000217.
LamLTengJG (2003) Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials17(6–7): 471–489. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X.
14.
LimJCOzbakkalogluT (2015a) Investigation of the influence of the application path of confining pressure: tests on actively confined and FRP-confined concretes. Journal of Structural Engineering141(8): 04014203. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001177.
15.
LimJCOzbakkalogluT (2015b) Unified stress-strain model for FRP and actively confined normal-strength and high-strength concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction19(4): 04014072. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000536.
16.
LimJCOzbakkalogluT (2015c) Lateral strain-to-axial strain relationship of confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering141(5): 04014141. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001094.
17.
NaLYiyanLShanL, et al. (2018) Slenderness effects on concrete-filled steel tube columns confined with CFRP. Journal of Constructional Steel Research143: 110–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.12.014.
18.
LiuJXuTGuoY, et al. (2019) Behavior of circular CFRP-steel composite tubed high-strength concrete columns under axial compression. Composite Structures211: 596–609. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.011.
19.
LiuJ-PXuT-XWangY-H, et al. (2018) Axial behaviour of circular steel tubed concrete stub columns confined by CFRP materials. Construction and Building Materials168(4): 221–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.131.
20.
LiuJZhouX (2010) Behavior and strength of tubed RC stub columns under axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research66(1): 28–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.08.006.
ParkJWHongYKHongGS, et al. (2011) Design formulas of concrete filled circular steel tubes reinforced by carbon fiber reinforced plastic sheets. Procedia Engineering14: 2916–2922. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.367.
23.
PopovicsS (1973) A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curves for concrete. Cement and Concrete Research3(5): 583–599. DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
24.
RabbatBGRussellHG (1985) Friction coefficient of steel on concrete or grout. Journal of Structural Engineering111(3): 505–515. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:3(505).
25.
RanJH (2014) Axial Compression Mechanical Behavior of FRP-Steel Composite Tube Confined Concrete Stub Columns (Master Dissertation). Dalian, Liaoning: Dalian University of Technology. (In Chinese).
26.
TaoZHanL-HZhuangJ-P (2007) Axial loading behavior of CFRP strengthened concrete-filled steel tubular stub columns. Advances in Structural Engineering10(1): 37–46. DOI: 10.1260/136943307780150814.
27.
TengJGChenJFSmithST, et al. (2002) FRP-strengthened RC Structures. UK: John Wiley and Sons.
28.
TengJGHuYMYuT (2013) Stress-strain model for concrete in FRP-confined steel tubular columns. Engineering Structures49: 156–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.001.
29.
TengJGHuangYLLamL, et al. (2007) Theoretical model for fiber-reinforced polymer-confined concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction11(2): 2012–2210. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(201).
30.
TomiiMSakinoKXiaoY, et al. (1985) Earthquake-resisting hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete short columns confined by steel tube. In: Proceedings of the International Speciality Conference on Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structures, Harbin, China, 1985, 119–125.
31.
WangXD (2017) Study on the Behavior and Strength of TRC and TSRC Columns (Doctor Dissertation). Harbin, Heilongjiang: Harbin Institute of Technology. (In Chinese).
32.
WangJChengLYangJ (2018) Compressive behavior of CFRP-steel composite tubed steel-reinforced columns with high-strength concrete. Journal of Constructional Steel Research150: 354–370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.028.
33.
WangQLQuSEShaoYB, et al. (2016) Static behavior of axially compressed circular concrete filled CFRP-steel tubular (C-CF-CFRP-ST) columns with moderate slenderness ratio. Advanced Steel Construction12(3): 263–295. DOI: 10.18057/IJASC.2016.12.3.4.
34.
WangQ-LZhaoZShaoY-B, et al. (2017) Static behavior of axially compressed square concrete filled CFRP-steel tubular (S-CF-CFRP-ST) columns with moderate slenderness. Thin-Walled Structures110: 106–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.10.019.
35.
WangXLiuJZhangS (2015) Behavior of short circular tubed-reinforced-concrete columns subjected to eccentric compression. Engineering Structures105: 77–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.001.
36.
WangYCaiGLiY, et al. (2019) Behavior of circular fiber-reinforced polymer-steel-confined concrete columns subjected to reversed cyclic loads: experimental studies and finite-element analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering145(9): 04019085. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002373.
37.
WeiYWuGLiG (2014) Performance of circular concrete-filled fiber-reinforced polymer-steel composite tube columns under axial compression. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites33(20): 1911–1928. DOI: 10.1177/0731684414550836.
38.
WuZSWangXIwashitaK, et al. (2010) Tensile fatigue behavior of FRP and hybrid FRP sheets. Composites Part B: Engineering41(5): 396–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.001.
39.
XiaoQGTengJGYuT (2010) Behavior and modeling of confined high-strength concrete. ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction14(3): 249–259. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000070.
40.
XiaoY (2004) Applications of FRP composites in concrete columns. Advances in Structural Engineering7(4): 335–343. DOI: 10.1260/1369433041653552.
41.
XiaoYWuH (2000) Compressive behavior of concrete confined by carbon fiber composite jackets. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering12(2): 1392–2146. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139).
XuTLiuJGuoY (2020c) Design method of short circular FRP-steel composite tubed RC columns under eccentric compression. Composite Structures262: 113359. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113359.
44.
XuTLiuJWangX, et al. (2020a) Behaviour of short CFRP-steel composite tubed reinforced normal and high strength concrete columns under eccentric compression. Engineering Structures205: 110096. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110096.
45.
XuTLiuJYuT, et al. (2020b) Design-oriented model for circular F-STC stub columns subjected to axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research170: 106061. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106061.
46.
YuFWuP (2011) Study on stress-strain relationship of FRP-confined concrete filled steel tubes. Advanced Materials Research163-167: 3826–3829. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.3826
