To date, scholarship has neglected the role of elite cues in shaping immigration attitudes. When included, attention has been limited to political elites and parties. Yet, other societal actors have the potential to shape attitudes. This article employs mixed methods to analyse the discourse of the Church of England and attempts to uncover whether this discourse impacts the immigration attitudes of ‘their’ audience in the United Kingdom during 2005–2015. The discourse analysis finds that non-threatening migration frames dominate. Using European Social Survey (ESS) data (Rounds 4–7), regression analysis indicates that greater exposure to elite cues, via attendance at religious services, is consistently related to more positive immigration attitudes. Thus, for those most exposed, elite cues may be acting as a partial bulwark against the ubiquitous security-threat discourse of political elites. Overall, findings imply that despite their previous neglect, religious elite actors have the capacity to shape immigration attitudes and therefore de/construct issues of security.
ApplebyRS (1999) The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion Violence and Reconciliation. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publications.
2.
BalzacqT (2005) Three faces of securitisation: Political agency, audience, and context. European Journal of International Relations11(2): 171–201.
3.
BalzacqT (2011) Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge.
4.
BalzacqTLéonardSRuzickaJ (2016) ‘Securitisation’ revisited: Theory and cases. International Relations30(4): 494–531.
5.
BashamVMVaughan-WilliamsN (2013) Gender, race and border security practices: A profane reading of ‘Muscular Liberalism’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations15(4): 509–527.
6.
BatsonCDSchoenradePVentisWL (1993) Religion and the Individual: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ben-Nun BloomPArikanG (2012a) Priming religious belief and religious social behaviour affects support for democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research25(3): 368–382.
9.
Ben-Nun BloomPArikanG (2012b) Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national test of the mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Studies43(2): 375–397.
10.
Ben-Nun BloomPArikanGCourtemancheM (2015) Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review109(2): 203–221.
11.
BigoD (2002) Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives27(1): 63–92.
12.
BigoD (2006) Liberty, whose liberty? The Hague Programme and the conception of freedom. In: BalzacqTCarreraS (eds) Security Versus Freedom? A Challenge for Europe’s Future. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 35–45.
13.
BoomgaardenHGFreireA (2009) Religion and Euroscepticism: Direct, indirect or no effects. West European Politics32(6): 1240–1265.
14.
BrewerJTenneyFHigginsG (2010) Religion and peacemaking: A conceptualization. Sociology44(6): 1009–1017.
15.
BrightJ (2015) In search of the politics of security. British Journal of Politics and International Relations17(4): 585–603.
BrownRKKaiserAJacksonSJ (2014) Worship discourse and white race-based policy attitudes. Review of Religious Research56(2): 291–312.
18.
BrownRKKaiserARushLet al. (2017) Immigrant-conscious congregations: Race, ethnicity, and the rejection of anti-immigrant frames. Politics and Religion10: 887–905.
19.
BuzanB (1983) People, States and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
20.
BuzanBWæverOde WildeJ (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishing.
21.
Case Collective (2006) Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto. Security Dialogue37(4): 443–487.
22.
CeyhanATsoukalaA (2002) The securitisation of migration in Western societies: Ambivalent discourse and policies. Alternatives27(3): 91–126.
23.
CliffordSJeritJ (2013) How words do the work of politics: Moral foundations theory and the debate over stem cell research. Journal of Politics75(3): 659–671.
24.
CliffordSJeritJRaineyCet al. (2015) Moral concerns and policy attitudes: Investigating the influence of elite rhetoric. Political Communication32(2): 229–248.
DjupePACalfanoBR (2012) Religious value priming, threat, and political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly66:768–780.
27.
DjupePACalfanoBR (2013a) God Talk: Experimenting with the Religious Causes of Public Opinion. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
28.
DjupePACalfanoBR (2013b) Divine intervention? The influence of religious values on support for U.S. interventionism. Political Behavior35(4): 643–663.
29.
DjupePAGilbertCP (2009) The Political Influence of Churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
DjupePAGwiasdaGW (2010) Evangelizing the environment: Decision process effects in political persuasion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion49(1): 73–86.
31.
DotyRL (2007) States of exception on the Mexico-US Border: Security, ‘Decisions’, and civilian border controls. International Political Sociology1(1): 113–137.
32.
EisingaRFellingAPetersJ (1990) Religious belief, church involvement, and ethnocentrism in the Netherlands. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion29(1): 54–75.
33.
FetzerJS (2001) Shaping pacifism: The role of the Local Anabaptist Pastor. In: Crawford SES and Olson LR (eds) Christian Clergy in American Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.177–187.
34.
FloydR (2016) Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures: What, and who, defines the ‘Success’ of securitisation. Cambridge Review of International Affairs29(2): 677–694.
35.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
36.
GuthJLGreenJCSmidtCEet al. (1997) The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
37.
HansenL (2000) The Little Mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium29(2): 285–306.
38.
HansenL (2011) The politics of securitisation and the Muhammad cartoon crisis: A post-structuralist perspective. Security Dialogue 42(4–5):357–369.
39.
HellwigTKweonY (2016) Taking cues on multidimensional issues: The case of attitudes toward immigration. West European Politics39(4): 710–730.
40.
HewstoneMSwartH (2011) Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology50(3): 374–386.
41.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
42.
HunsbergerBJacksonLM (2005) Religion, meaning and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues61(4): 807–826.
43.
HuysmansJ (1995) Migrants as a security problem: Dangers of ‘Securitising’ societal issues. In: MilesRThranhardtD (eds) Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion. London: Pinter Publishers, pp.53–72.
44.
HuysmansJ (2000) The European Union and the securitisation of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies38(5): 751–777.
45.
JonesBMartinDJ (2017) Path-to-citizenship or deportation? How elite cues shaped opinion on immigration in the 2010 U.S House election. Political Behavior39: 177–204.
46.
KaryotisG (2007) European Migration Policy in the aftermath of September 11: The Security-Migration Nexus. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences20(1): 1–17.
47.
KaryotisGPatrikiosS (2010) Religion, securitisation and anti-immigration attitudes: The case of Greece. Journal of Peace Research47(1): 43–57.
48.
KlüfersP (2014) Security repertoires: Towards a sociopragmatist framing of securitisation processes. Critical Studies on Security2(3): 278–292.
49.
KnollBR (2009) ‘And Who Is My Neighbour?’ Religion and immigration policy attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion48(2): 313–331.
50.
LaustenCBWæverO (2000) In defense of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitisation. Journal of International Studies29(3): 705–739.
51.
LéonardSKaunertC (2011) Reconceptualizing the audience in securitisation theory. In: BalzacqT (ed.) Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge, pp.31–76.
52.
LittleD (2007) Peacemakers in Action: Profiles of Religion in Conflict Resolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
LubbersMCoendersMScheepersP (2006) Objections to asylum seeker centres: Individual and contextual determinants of resistance to small and large centres in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review22(3): 243–257.
54.
McDanielELNooruddinIShortleAF (2011) Divine boundaries: How religion shapes citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants. American Politics Research39(1): 205–233.
55.
McDonaldM (2008) Securitisation and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations14(4): 563–587.
56.
McLarenLM (2001) Immigration and the new politics of inclusion and exclusion in the European Union: The effect of elites and the EU on individual-level opinions regarding European and non-European immigrants. European Journal of Political Research39(1): 81–108.
57.
McLarenLM (2012) The cultural divide in Europe: Migration, multiculturalism, and political trust. World Politics64(2): 199–241.
58.
McSweeneyB (1996) Review: Identity and security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School. Review of International Studies22(1): 81–93.
59.
McSweeneyB (1999) Security, Identity and Interests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
MargolisM (2018) How far does social group influence reach? Elites, evangelicals, and immigration attitudes. Journal of Politics. Epub ahead of print 8 March 2018: doi.org/10.1086/693985
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
66.
QuillianL (1995) Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review60(4): 586–611.
67.
RoeP (2008) Actor, audience(s) and emergency measures: Securitisation and the UK’s decision to invade Iraq. Security Dialogue39(6): 615–635.
68.
SalterMB (2008) Securitisation and desecuritisation: A dramaturgical analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. Journal of International Relations and Development11(4): 321–349.
69.
SalterMB (2011) When securitisation fails: The hard case of counter-terrorism programs. In: BalzacqT (ed.) Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge, pp.116–131.
70.
SchainMA (2008) The Politics of Immigration in France, Britain and the United States: A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
71.
ScheepersPGijsbertsMHelloE (2002) Religiosity and prejudice against ethnic minorities in Europe: Cross-national tests on a controversial relationship. Review of Religious Research43(3): 242–265.
72.
SemyonovMRaijmanR Yom TovAet al. (2004) Population size, perceived threat, and exclusion: A multiple-indicators analysis of attitudes towards foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research33(4): 681–701.
73.
SmidtCEKellstedtLAGuthJL (2009) The role of religion in American politics: Explanatory theories and associated analytical and measurement issues. In: SmidtCEKellstedtLAGuthJL (eds) Oxford Handbook on Religion and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.3–42.
74.
SnidermanPMHagendoonLPriorM (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review98(1): 35–49.
75.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEde VriesCE (2007) Who’s cueing whom?: Mass elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
76.
StritzelH (2007) Towards a theory of securitisation: Copenhagen and beyond. European Journal of International Relations13(3): 357–383.
77.
StritzelH (2012) Securitisation, power, intertextuality: Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime. Security Dialogue43(6): 549–567.
78.
TajfelH (1970) Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American232: 96–102.
79.
The Church of England (CoE) (2015) Who is my neighbour? A letter from the House of Bishops to the People and Parishes of the Church of England for the General Election2015, 17February. London: The CoE.
80.
VossingK (2015) Transforming public opinion about European integration: Elite influence and its limits. European Union Politics16(2): 157–175.
81.
VuoriJA (2008) Illocutionary logic and the strands of securitisation: Applying the theory of securitisation to the study of non-democratic political orders. European Journal of International Relations14(1): 65–99.
82.
WæverO (1993) Societal security: The concept. In: WæverOBuzanBKelstrupM (eds) Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp.17–40.
83.
WæverO (1995) Securitisation and desecuritisation. In: LipshutzRD (ed.) On Security. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.46–86.
84.
WæverO (1998) Insecurity, security and asecurity in the West European non-war community. In: AdlerEBarnettM (eds) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.69–118.
85.
WaldKD (1992) Religious elites and public opinion: The impact of the Bishops’ Peace Pastoral. The Review of Politics54(1): 112–143.
86.
WaldKDSmidtCE (1993) Measurement strategies in the study of religion and politics. In: LeegeDCKellstedtLA (eds) Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. New York: M. E. Sharpe, pp.26–49.
87.
WaldKDOwenDEHillSS (1988) Churches as political communities. The American Political Science Review82(2): 531–548.
88.
WallstenKNtetaTM (2016) For you were strangers in the Land of Egypt: Clergy, religiosity, and public opinion toward immigration reform in the United States. Politics and Religion9(3): 566–604.
89.
WaltSM (1991) The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly35(2): 211–239.
90.
WeldonS (2006) The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities: A comparative, multilevel analysis of western Europe. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 331–349.
91.
WilkinsonC (2011) The limits of spoken words: From meta-narratives to experiences of security. In: BalzacqT (ed.) Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge, pp.94–115.
92.
WilliamsMC (1998) Modernity, identity and security: A comment on the ‘Copenhagen Controversy’. Review of International Studies24(3): 435–439.
93.
WilliamsMC (2003) Words, images, enemies: Securitisation and international politics. International Studies Quarterly47(4): 511–531.
94.
WilliamsMC (2011) The continuing evolution of securitisation theory. In: BalzacqT (ed.) Securitisation Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge, pp.212–222.
