Advancing the concept of populism as a political style, this study compares the debate performances of two British party leaders, Nick Clegg and Nigel Farage, as they clashed in a pair of televised debates over Britain’s European Union (EU) membership leading up to the 2014 European Parliament elections. The argument is tested that if under certain conditions, mainstream politicians will adopt a populist style although retaining a non-populist agenda. A mixed-methods approach combines quantitative text analysis with a qualitative rhetorical analysis to demonstrate how the populist and non-populist style can be distinguished and compared systematically. The results suggest that Clegg, while maintaining a non-populist ideology, adopts a populist style after losing the first debate. Farage’s communication style, conversely, remains stable to the point of statistical significance. This suggests that one explanatory factor of populists’ success is the consistency of their message and rhetorical delivery, bolstering their perceived authenticity among voters.
AkkermanT (2012) Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996–2010). West European Politics35(3): 511–529.
2.
AlexanderJ (2011) Performance and Power. Cambridge: Polity.
3.
AslanidisP (2015) Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies64(1S): 88–104.
4.
AtkinsJ (2011) Justifying New Labour Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
AtkinsJFinlaysonA (2013) ‘… A 40-year-old black man made the point to me’: Everyday knowledge and the performance of leadership in contemporary British politics. Political Studies61(1): 161–177.
6.
AtkinsJTurnbullN (2014) Conclusion: Rhetoric, British identity and interdisciplinarity. In: AtkinsJFinlaysonAMartinJ. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.173–184.
7.
BaleTGreen-PedersenCKrouwelA. (2010) If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in western Europe. Political Studies58(3): 410–426.
8.
BrantsKVoltmerK (2011) Introduction: Mediatization and de-centralization in political communication. In: BrantsKVoltmerK (eds) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–18.
9.
BuddRThorpRKDonohewL (1967) Content Analysis of Communications. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
CanovanM (1984) ‘People’, politicians and populism. Government and Opposition19(3): 312–327.
11.
Charteris-BlackJ (2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CreswellJ (2014) Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publishing.
13.
CrinesAS (2013a) An analysis of George Galloway’s oratorical and rhetorical impact. Politics33(2): 81–90.
14.
CrinesAS (2013b) The rhetoric of the coalition: Governing in the national interest?Representation49(2): 207–218.
15.
CrinesASHaytonR (2015) Labour Orators from Bevan to Miliband. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
16.
CrinesASHeppellT (2016) Rhetorical style and issue emphasis within the conference speeches of UKIP’s Nigel Farage 2010–2014. British Politics. Epub ahead of print 5October. Available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/bp.2016.2 (accessed 5 October 2015).
17.
De LangeSL (2012) New alliances: Why mainstream parties govern with radical right-wing populist parties. Political Studies60(4): 899–918.
18.
DommettK (2014) Rhetoric and party politics—Looking beyond the leader. In: AtkinsJFinlaysonAMartinJ. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.73–86.
19.
Dutceac SegestenABossettaM (2016) A typology of political participation online: How citizens used Twitter to mobilize during the 2015 British general elections. Information, Communication & Society. Epub ahead of print 6November. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1252413 (accessed 22 May 2017).
20.
FinlaysonA (2012) Rhetoric and the political theory of ideologies. Political Studies60(4): 751–767.
21.
FinlaysonAMartinJ (2008) ‘It ain’t what you say …’: British political studies and the analysis of speech and rhetoric. British Politics3(4): 445–464.
22.
FinlaysonMMartinJ (2014) Introduction: Rhetoric and the British way of politics. In: AtkinsJFinlaysonAMartinJ. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–16.
GilpinDPalazzoloEBrodyN (2010) Socially mediated authenticity. Journal of Communication Management14(3): 258–278.
25.
HayC (1996) Narrating crisis: The discursive construction of the winter of discontent. Sociology30(2): 253–277.
26.
HaytonRCrinesAS (2015) Conservative Orators from Baldwin to Cameron. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
27.
HeylighenFDewaeleJM (2002) Variation in the contextuality of language: An empirical measure. Foundations of Science7(3): 293–340.
28.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
29.
JagersJWalgraveS (2007) Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
30.
KaufmanLRousseeuwPJ (2005) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
31.
KazinM (1998) The Populist Persuasion: An American History. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
KrebsRRJacksonPT (2007) Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations13(1): 35–66.
33.
KriesiH (2014) The populist challenge. West European Politics37(2): 361–378.
34.
KriesiHPappasTS (2015) Populism in Europe during crisis: An introduction. In: KriesiHPappasTS (eds) European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.1–22.
35.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
36.
LiebesT (2001) Look me straight in the eye: The political discourse of authenticity, spontaneity, and sincerity. The Communication Review4(4): 499–510.
37.
MarcusGR (2000) Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science3(1): 221–250.
38.
MartinJ (2014) Politics and Rhetoric: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge.
39.
MartinJ (2015) Situating speech: A rhetorical approach to political strategy. Political Studies63(1): 25–42.
40.
MazzoleniG (2014) Mediatization and political populism. In: EsserFStrömbäckJ (eds) Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.3–30.
41.
MoffittB (2015) How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition50(2): 189–217.
42.
MoffittB (2016) The Global Rise of Populism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
MoffittBTormeyS (2014) Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies62(2): 381–397.
44.
MoonDS (2014) Rhetoric and devolution—Time and space in Welsh Labour rhetoric. In: AtkinsJFinlaysonAMartinJ. (eds) Rhetoric in British Politics and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.87–100.
45.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 542–563.
46.
MuddeC (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 1–19.
ParryKRichardsonK (2011) Political imagery in the British general election of 2010: The curious case of Nick Clegg. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations13(4): 474–489.
49.
ReisiglM (2008) Analyzing political rhetoric. In: WodakRKrzyżanowskiM (eds) Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.96–120.
50.
RinkerTW (2013) qdap: Quantitative Discourse Analysis R Package 2.2.4. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo. Available at: http://github.com/trinker/qdap (accessed 1 April 2016).
51.
RolfeM (2016) The Reinvention of Populist Rhetoric in the Digital Age: Insiders and Outsiders in Democratic Politics. Singapore: Springer Nature.
52.
RooduijnM (2014) The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition49(4): 573–599.
53.
RooduijnMPauwelsT (2011) Measuring populism: Comparing two methods of content analysis. West European Politics34(6): 1272–1283.
54.
RooduijnMDe LangeSLVan Der BrugW (2012) A populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics20(4): 563–575.
55.
SchumacherGVan KersbergenK (2016) Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?Party Politics22(3): 300–312.
56.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13(1): 95–110.
57.
SuzukiRShimodairaH (2015) pvclust: Hierarchical clustering with p-values via multiscape bootstrap resampling R package version 2.0-0. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pvclust (accessed 1 April 2016).
58.
Tournier-SolK (2015) Reworking the Eurosceptic and conservative traditions into a populist narrative: UKIP’s winning formula. Journal of Common Market Studies53: 1140–1156.
59.
Van SpanjeJ (2010) Contagious parties, anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics16(5): 563–586.
60.
VasilopoulouSHalikioloulouDExadaktylosT (2014) Greece in crisis: Austerity, populism, and the politics of blame. Journal of Common Market Studies52(2): 388–402.
61.
WashbourneN (2013) More than Cleggmania? The celebrity politician, presidentialization and the UK 2010 televised leader debates. In: EkströmMTolsonA (eds) Media Talk and Political Elections in Europe and America. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.113–132.
