Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Driven by food crises and constraints on natural resources, investors are increasingly leasing or purchasing farmland abroad. This study systematically tests which political institutions attract these investors. I argue that food scarcity concerns incentivize foreign investors in agriculture to prioritize unopposed, quick deals above other predicted factors such as low political risk. I thus predict that investors will invest in nondemocratic hosts and hosts with weak laws to ensure fast negotiations, easily transferred land, and minimal citizen opposition. Panel regressions corroborate that the rule of law is statistically insignificant and democracy is negative and statistically significant in predicting agricultural foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows.

Keywords

agriculture democracy foreign direct investment rule of law

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

Fiess

MacDonald

(2010) Do institutions matter for foreign direct investment? Open Economies Review 21: 201–219.

Anseeuw

Lay

Messerli

. (2013) Creating a public tool to assess and promote transparency in global land deals: The experience of the land matrix. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3): 521–530.

Arezki

Bruckner

(2011) Food prices and political instability. IMF working paper. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2011/wp1162.pdf (accessed 5 June 2016).

Arezki

Deininger

Selod

(2016) What drives the global ‘land rush?’ The World Bank Economic Review 30(2): 207–233.

Bayulgen

(2010) Foreign Investment and Political Regimes: The Oil Sector in Azerbaijan, Russia, and Norway. New York: Cambridge University Press.

BBC (2009a) Africans reject Madagascar leader. BBC, 19 March. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7953617.stm (accessed 20 June 2016).

BBC (2009b) Madagascar leader axes land deal. BBC, 19 March. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7952628.stm (accessed 20 June 2016).

Berthelsen

(2009) The food revolution. Development Asia, August. Available at: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28716/devasia4.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

Biglaiser

Staats

(2010) Do political institutions affect foreign direct investment? A survey of U.S. corporations in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 508–522.

10.

Borras

(2012) Resisting Contemporary Land Grabs. Institute of Development Studies. Available at: http://www.ids.ac.uk/news/resisting-contemporary-land-grabs (accessed 20 June 2016).

11.

Borras

Franco

(2013) Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1723–1747.

12.

Borras

Franco

Isakson

. (2016) The rise of flex crops and commodities: Implications for research. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43(1): 93–115.

13.

Borras

Kay

Gomez

. (2012) Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: Key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 33(4): 402–416.

14.

Braun

Meinzen-Dick

(2009) ‘Land Grabbing’ by Foreign Investors in Developing Countries: Risks and Opportunities. International Food Policy Research Institute. Available at: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/land-grabbing-foreign-investors-developing-countries (accessed 20 June 2016).

15.

Brautigam

Zhang

(2013) Green dreams: Myth and reality in China’s agricultural investment in Africa. Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1676–1696.

16.

Buckley

Clegg

Cross

. (2007) The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 38(4): 499–518.

17.

Busse

(2004) Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties. Kyklos 57(1): 45–66.

18.

Chaudhuri

Banerjee

(2010) FDI in agricultural land, welfare and unemployment in a developing economy. Research in Economics 64: 229–239.

19.

Cotula

(2012) The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 649–680.

20.

Cotula

Vermeulen

Leonard

. (2009) Land Grab or Development Opportunity? Agricultural Investment and International Land Deals in Africa. London: Russell Press; IIED/FAO/IFAD.

21.

Daniel

(2011) Land grabbing and potential implications for world food security. In: Behnassi

Shahid

D’Silva

(eds) Sustainable Agricultural Development. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 25–42.

22.

Daniel

Mittal

(2010) (Mis)Investment in Agriculture. The Oakland Institute. Available at: http://www.oaklandinstitute.org/sites/oaklandinstitute.org/files/misinvestment_web.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

23.

Daude

Stein

(2007) The quality of institutions and foreign direct investment. Economics & Politics 19(3): 317–344.

24.

De Schutter

(2011) How not to think of land grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 249–279.

25.

Deininger

(2011) Challenges posed by the new wave of farmland investment. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38(2): 217–247.

26.

Edelman

(2013) Messy hectares: Questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3): 485–501.

27.

Fairhead

Leach

Scoones

(2012) Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(2): 237–261.

28.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2013) World food situation: FAO food price index. Available at: http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/ (accessed 23 October 2013).

29.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2015) FAO stat. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E (accessed 25 June 2015).

30.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), . (2010) Principles for responsible agricultural investment that respects rights, livelihoods and resources. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/INTERNATIONAL-TRADE/FDIs/RAI_Principles_Synoptic.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

31.

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Investment Centre (2015) Foreign agriculture investment database. Available at: http://www.fao.org/investment/investment-policy/fdi/en/ (accessed 25 June 2015).

32.

Franco

Mehta

Veldwisch

(2013) The global politics of water grabbing. Third World Quarterly 34(9): 1651–1675.

33.

Freedom House (2015) Freedom in the world. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world#.VZG64euE4Xw (accessed 24 June 2015).

34.

Galaty

(2014) ‘Unused’ land and unfulfilled promises: Justifications for displacing communities in East Africa. Nomadic Peoples 18: 80–93.

35.

German

Schoneveld

Mwangi

(2013) Contemporary processes of large-scale land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa: Legal deficiency or elite capture of the rule of law? World Development 48: 1–18.

36.

Gingembre

(2015) Resistance or participation? Fighting against corporate land access amid political uncertainty in Madagascar. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3–4): 561–584.

37.

Globerman

Shapiro

(2002) Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development 30(11): 1899–1919.

38.

Haber

Razo

Maurer

(2003) The Politics of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

39.

Haggard

(1990) Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

40.

Hall

(2011) Land grabbing in Southern Africa: The many faces of the investor rush. Review of African Political Economy 38(128): 193–214.

41.

Hall

Edelman

Borras

. (2015) Resistance, acquiescence, or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3–4): 467–488.

42.

Hallam

(2009) Foreign Investment in Developing Country Agriculture—Issues, Policy Implications and International Response. OECD Global Forum on International Investment. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/44231828.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

43.

Hallam

(2011) International investment in developing country agriculture: Issues and challenges. Food Security 3: 91–98.

44.

Hanjra

Qureshi

(2010) Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 35: 365–377.

45.

Henisz

(2000) The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics & Politics 12(1): 1–31.

46.

Henisz

(2004) Political institutions and policy volatility. Economics & Politics 16(1): 1–27.

47.

Huber

Powell

(1994) Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy. World Politics 46(3): 291–326.

48.

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (2011) Responding to ‘land grabbing’ and promoting responsible investment in agriculture. Available at: http://www.ifad.org/pub/op/2_e.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

49.

Jensen

(2003) Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization 57: 587–616.

50.

Kolstad

Wiig

(2012) What determines Chinese outward FDI? Journal of World Business 47: 26–34.

51.

Land Matrix Global Observatory, International Land Coalition (ILC), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), . (2014) Available at: http://www.landmatrix.org/en/ (accessed 2 April 2014).

52.

Lavers

(2012a) ‘Land grab’ as development strategy? The political economy of agricultural investment in Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(1): 105–132.

53.

Lavers

(2012b) Patterns of Agrarian transformation in Ethiopia: State-Mediated commercialisation and the ‘land grab’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(3–4): 795–822.

54.

(2006) Democracy, autocracy, and tax incentives to foreign direct investors: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics 68(1): 62–74.

55.

Resnick

(2003) Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization 57: 175–211.

56.

Linz

(2000) Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

57.

Locher

Sulle

(2014) Challenges and methodological flaws in reporting the global land rush: Observations from Tanzania. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(4): 569–592.

58.

McAllister

(2015) Rubber, rights and resistance: The evolution of local struggles against a Chinese rubber concession in Northern Laos. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42(3–4): 817–837.

59.

McGrath

(2015) Global warming increases ‘food shocks’ threat. BBC News, 14 August. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33910552 (accessed 20 June 2016).

60.

Makki

(2012) Power and property: Commercialization, enclosures, and the transformation of agrarian relations in Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39(1): 81–104.

61.

Margulis

McKeon

Borras

(2013) Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives. Globalizations 10(1): 1–23.

62.

Marshall

Gurr

(2012) Polity IV project. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm (accessed 24 March 2014).

63.

Mehta

Veldwisch

Franco

(2012) Introduction to the special issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives 5(2): 193–207.

64.

Meltzer

Richard

(1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–927.

65.

Mihalache-O’Keef

(2006) Democratic institutions and sectoral foreign direct investment. Presented at international studies association annual conference, San Diego, California March 2006.

66.

Mihalache-O’Keef

(2011) Modernization versus dependency revisited: Effects of foreign direct investment on food security in less developed countries. International Studies Quarterly 55: 71–93.

67.

Mittal

(2013) Indian land grabs in Ethiopia show dark side of South-South cooperation. The Guardian. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/feb/25/indian-land-grabs-ethiopia (accessed 20 June 2016).

68.

Nolte

(2014) Large-Scale agricultural investments under poor land governance in Zambia. Land Use Policy 38: 698–706.

69.

North

Weingast

(1989) Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History 49(4): 803–832.

70.

O’Donnell

(1978) Reflections on the patterns of change in bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review 13(1): 3–38.

71.

Olson

(1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review 87(3): 567–576.

72.

Oneal

(1994) The affinity of foreign investors for authoritarian regimes. Political Research Quarterly 47: 565–588.

73.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010) Responsible investment in agriculture. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/45424283.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

74.

Osabuohien

(2014) Large-Scale agricultural land investments and local institutions in Africa: The Nigerian case. Land Use Policy 39: 155–165.

75.

Oya

(2013) Methodological reflections on ‘land grab’ databases and the ‘land grab’ literature ‘rush’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3): 503–520.

76.

Parry

Rosenzweig

(1993) Food supply and risk of hunger. The Lancet 342(8883): 1345–1347.

77.

Pineiro

Villarreal

(2012) Foreign Investment in Agriculture in MERCOSUR Member Countries. The International Institute for Sustainable Development and Trade Knowledge Network. Available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/foreign_investment_mercosur.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

78.

Putnam

(1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42: 427–460.

79.

Ross

(2012) The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

80.

Rulli

Saviori

D’Odorico

(2013) Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(3): 892–897.

81.

Schelling

(1963) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

82.

Schoneveld

(2014) The geographic and sectoral patterns of large-scale farmland investments in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy 48: 34–50.

83.

Scoones

Hall

Borras

. (2013) The politics of evidence: Methodologies for understanding the global land rush. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40(3): 469–483.

84.

Smith

(2012) Coffee colonialism in Laos. Asia Times. Available at: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NF20Ae01.html (accessed 20 June 2016).

85.

Stanciu

(2014) The Romanian food sector attractiveness. SEA: Practical Application of Science 2(3): 603–610.

86.

The Guardian (2013) Developers risk losing billons if they fail to address land conflicts. The Guardian, 19 September, Claire Provost. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/sep/19/developers-land-rights-conflicts (accessed 20 June 2016).

87.

Tsebelis

(1995) Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.

88.

Vachadze

(2013) Land market liberalization, transfer of agricultural technology, and the process of industrialization. Land Use Policy 35: 388–394.

89.

Vermeulen

Cotula

(2010) Over the heads of local people: Consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuel projects in Africa. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37(4): 899–916.

90.

Walsh

(2010) Determinants of foreign direct investment: A sectoral and institutional approach. IMF working paper. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=24135.0 (accessed 20 June 2016).

91.

Weymouth

(2011) Political institutions and property rights: Veto players and foreign exchange commitments in 127 countries. Comparative Political Studies 44(2): 211–240.

92.

Wolford

Borras

Hall

. (2013) Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44(2): 189–210.

93.

World Bank (1992) World development report: Development and the environment. Available at: http://wdronline.worldbank.org/worldbank/a/c.html/world_development_report_1992/abstract/WB.0-1952-0876-5.abstract1 (accessed 20 June 2016).

94.

World Bank (2005) Energy security issues. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRUSSIAN-FEDERATION/Resources/Energy_Security_eng.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

95.

World Bank (2010) Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? 7 September. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTARD/Resources/ESW_Sept7_final_final.pdf (accessed 20 June 2016).

96.

World Bank (2013) World development indicators database. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-cata-log/world-development-indicators (accessed 20 January 2014).

97.

World Bank (2014) Aggregate governance indicators 1996–2013. Available at: http://www.govindicators.org (accessed 24 March 2014).

98.

World Bank (2015) World development indicators database. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators (accessed 25 June 2015).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB

Investing in agriculture: A preference for democracy or dictatorship?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material