With the People's Republic of China flush with US foreign reserves generated from a significant trade imbalance with the United States (US). Chinese firms have begun to exercise foreign direct investment by acquiring US corporations. Considering the emerging military threat of China in the Pacific Rim area and economic issues involving the under-valuation of the Chinese yuan, this investment diversity strategy (beyond US Treasury debt) has resulted in serious questions being raised about whether national and economic security is at risk if these business transactions were to be consummated. Consequently, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the federal oversight commission reviewing the appropriateness of such transactions, has come under intense Congressional scrutiny. After evaluating the literature concerning the operations and performance of CFIUS, it is recommended that CFIUS share its operational performance on a quarterly basis with select committees in the US Congress; that mandated filings of specific categories of defense-related acquisitions be authorized; and that both CFIUS and the US President (and not the US Congress) continue to define what is ‘national security’.
AndersonT.W. (2005) Foreign direct investment in the United States: New investment in 2004, Survey of Current Business, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, June: 30–37.
4.
ArmstrongD. (2005) China's investment strategy focuses on brand names, San Francisco Chronicle, 24 June: C1.
5.
KearneyA.T. (2004) China and India jockey for the top most attractive foreign direct investment destination globally while the US is challenged by these rapidly evolving economies, say global executives in new A.T. Kearney study, press release, 12 October.
6.
AuerbachS. (1990) President tells China to sell Seattle firm, Washington Post, 8 February: F3.
7.
BachC.L. (2005) US international transactions, 2004, Survey of Current Business, US Department of Commerce, April.
IBM Press (2004) Lenovo to acquire personal computing division, press release, 7 December, Armonk, New York and Beijing, China.
18.
IritaniE. (2005) New foreign investment scrutiny pushed: The drive was mounted after China's bid for Unocal, but businesses fear that it could keep out much needed capital from overseas, Los Angeles Times, 6 October: C.3.
19.
JacksonJ.K. (2005) The Exon-Florio national security test for foreign investment, CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RS22197, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, DC, 15 July.
20.
KimmittR.M. (2005) Deputy Secretary Robert M. Kimmitt, US Department of the Treasury, Testimony before the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, press release, US Department of the Treasury, 20 October, Washington, DC.
21.
KonczJ.L.YorgasonD.R. (2005) Direct investment positions for 2004: Country and industry detail, Survey of Current Business, July: 40–53.
22.
Letter to the Chair and Ranking Member, Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, US Senate, Hearing (2005) A Review of the CFIUS Process for Implementing the Exon-Florio Amendment, 6 October.
OECD Observer (2003) China ahead in foreign direct investment, May, No. 237, at: http://www.oecdobserver.org.
28.
Office of the Secretary of Defense, US Department of Defense (2005) Annual Report to Congress: The Military Power of the People's Republic of China, Washington, DC.
29.
Organization for International Investment (2005a) Fact sheet: Committee on foreign investment in the United States (CFIUS). Washington, DC.
PetersonJ. (2005) Panel has a big say in foreign purchases: Security clearance for a Chinese bid for Unocal would unhinge an obscure US committee, Los Angeles Times, 5 July: C1.
Senate of the United States (2005) To authorize appropriate action if the negotiations with the People's Republic of China regarding China's undervalued currency are not successful, S.295, 109th Congress, 1st Session, February 3.
37.
SeitzingerM.L. (1994) Foreign investment in the United States: Major federal statutory restrictions, Congressional Research Service, CSR Report 94-610, available through Penny Hill Press, Order No. RL33103.
Taipei Times (2005) Panel wants US to get tough on China, 10 November 10: 12.
40.
White House (2006) Economic Report of the President (China—exchange rate management and a rising saving rate, 135–136). February, Washington, DC.
41.
US–China Economic and Security Review Commission (2005) 2005 Report to Congress, 9 November, Washington, DC.
42.
US Department of Commerce (2005) Trade gap widens in September 2005, US International Trade in Goods and Services, press release, Bureau of Economic Analysis and US Census Bureau, Washington, DC., 10 November.
43.
US Department of the Treasury (2005) Report on foreign portfolio hearings of US securities as of 30 June, 2004, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
44.
US General Accounting Office (2002) Defense trade: Mitigating national security concerns under Exon-Florio could be improved, Report to the Chairman (GAO-02-736). Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, US House of Representatives, September, Washington, DC.
45.
US General Accountability Office (2005a) Defense trade: Enhancements to the implementation of Exon-Florio could strengthen the law's effectiveness, Report to Congressional Requesters (GAO-05-686). September, Washington, DC.
46.
US General Accountability Office (2005b) Defense trade: Implementation of Exon-Florio, Testimony before the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, Statement of Kathleen Schinasi, Managing Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management, 6 October, Washington, DC.
47.
US Senate (2005) Foreign investment security act (S.1729), 29 September, US Congress, Washington, DC.
