Abstract
The purpose of this article is to articulate a conception of emancipation for the Anthropocene. First, the Kantian roots of emancipation understood as the capacity of rational beings to act according to self-chosen ends are explained. It is shown that this conception of emancipation sets the realm of autonomous beings humans over the realm of heteronomous beings. Accounts of the ‘humanisation of nature’ are analysed as incomplete attempts to overcome this dualism. It is argued that the root of this incompleteness lies in the application of analytical rather than dialectical reason to the human–nature interaction. The Anthropocene is presented as the geological–historical moment when at the same time as nature is being humanised, humans are being made aware of themselves as animal. This gives way to a conception of Anthropocene emancipation which will be described in a fourth section. The article concludes with reflections on COVID-19 as a ‘disease of the Anthropocene’ and as an opportunity reflexively, and at unprecedented scale, to internalise our heteronomy and to live an emancipation fit for a terraforming species.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adorno
T. W.
Horkheimer
M.
(2002 ). Dialectic of enlightenment . Stanford University Press .
2.BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) (2020 ). California wildfires . https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-54095895
3.
Bennett
J.
(2010 ). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things . Duke University Press .
4.
Berman
M.
(1981 ). The reenchantment of the world . Cornell University Press .
5.
Berry
J.
(2006 ). Environmental stewardship . Bloomsbury .
6.
Bhaskar
R.
(1991 ). Philosophy and the idea of freedom . Blackwell .
7.
Blühdorn
I.
(2020 ). The dialectic of democracy: Modernization, emancipation and the great regression . Democratization , 27 (3 ), 389 –407 .
8.
Blundell
R.
Costa Dias
M.
Joyce
R.
Xu
X.
(2020 ). Covid-19 and inequalities . Fiscal Studies , 41 (2 ), 291 –319 .
9.
Borges
J. L.
(1999 ). On exactitude in science . In
Borges
J. L.
(Ed.)
Hurley
A.
(trans) Collected fictions . Penguin Books .
10.
Bostock
H.
Lowe
D.
(2018 ). Update on the formalisation of the Anthropocene . Quaternary Australasia , 35 (1 ), 14 –16 .
11.Center for Disaster Philanthropy . (2019 ). 2019-2020 Australian bushfires . Retrieved October 21, 2020 from: https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disaster/2019-australian-wildfires/
12.
Crutzen
P.
Stoermer
R.
(2000 ). The ‘Anthropocene’ . Global Change Newsletter , 41 , 17 –18 .
13.
Delanty
G.
(2020 ). Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic . LSE Europe in Question Discussion Series 156
. Retrieved August 14, 2020 from: https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/Assets/Documents/LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper156.pdf
14.
Delanty
G.
Mota
A.
(2017 ). Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, governance, knowledge . European Journal of Social Theory , 20 (1 ), 9 –38 .
15.
Dobson
A.
(1990 ). Green political thought . Routledge .
16.
Dobson
A.
(2020 ). Covid-19: How to live in the Anthropocene? Retrieved August 13, 2020 from: http://www.andrewdobson.com/essays.html
17.
Engels
F.
(1966 ). Anti-dühring . International Publishers .
18.
Fremaux
A.
Barry
J.
(2019 ). The 'Good Anthropocene' and Green Political Theory: Rethinking environmentalism, resisting eco-modernism . Retrieved August 10, 2020 from : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330762459_The_Good_Anthropocene_and_Green_Political_Theory_Rethinking_Environmentalism_Resisting_Eco-modernism
19.
Hanson
M.
(2003 ). The precautionary principle . In
Page
E.
Proops
J.
(Eds.), Environmental thought (pp. 125 –143 ). Edward Elgar .
20.
Hegel
G.
(2010 ). Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences in basic outline: Science of logic . Cambridge University Press .
21.
Hoare
K.
Hoare
N.
(2018 ). With the world on fire, we must act now to tackle climate change . The Guardian , 8 August . Retrieved October 26, 2020 from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/aug/08/with-the-world-on-fire-we-must-act-now-to-tackle-climate-change
22.
Latour
B.
(2004 ). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy . Harvard University Press .
23.
Lepori
M.
(2015 ). There is no Anthropocene: Climate change, species-talk, and political economy . Telos , 172 , 103 –124 .
24.
Lowe
D.
(2018 ). Personal communication .]
25.
Luke
T.
(2017 ). Reconstructing social theory and the Anthropocene . European Journal of Social Theory , 20 (1 ), 80 –94 .
26.
Lynas
M.
(2011 ). The god species: Saving the planet in the age of humans . National Geographic Society .
27.
MacIntyre
A.
(1999 ). Dependent Rational Animals: Why human beings need the virtues . Open Court .
28.
Malm
A.
(2015 ). The Anthropocene myth . Jacobin . https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/03/anthropocene-capitalism-climate-change/
29.
Marx
K.
(1852 ). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte . https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/ch01.htm
30.
Marx
K.
(1904 ). A contribution to the critique of political economy . Charles Kerr and Co .
31.
McKibben
B.
(1989 ). The end of nature . Random House .
32.
Næss
A.
(1973 ). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movements . Inquiry , 16 (1–4 ), 95 –100 .
33.
O’Callaghan-Gordo
C.
Antó
J.-M.
(2020 ). COVID-19: The disease of the Anthropocene . Environmental Research , 187 , 109683 .
34.
Rockström
J.
Steffen
W.
Noone
K.
Persson
A.
Chapin
III F. S.
Lambin
E.
Lenton
T. M.
Scheffer
M.
Folke
C.
Schellnhuber
H. J.
Nykvist
B.
de Wit
C. A.
Hughes
T.
van der Leeuw
S.
Rodhe
H.
Sörlin
S.
Snyder
P. K.
Costanza
R.
…
Svedin
U.
(2009 ). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity . Ecology and Society , 14 (2 ), 32 .
35.
Sartre
J.-P.
(1976 ). Critique of dialectical reason (Volume 1) . New Left Books .
36.
Sessions
G.
(1995 ). Deep ecology for the 21st century . Shambhala Publications .
37.
Steffen
W.
Richardson
K.
Rockström
J.
Cornell
S. E.
Fetzer
I.
Bennett
E. M.
Biggs
R.
Carpenter
S. R.
de Vries
W.
de Wit
C. A.
Folke
C.
Gerten
D.
Heinke
J.
Mace
G. M.
Persson
L. M.
Ramanathan
V.
Reyers
B.
Sörlin
S.
(2015 ). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet . Science , 348 (6240 ), 1217 .
38.
Stiglitz
J.
(2020 ). Conquering the great divide . Finance and Development . https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2020/09/COVID19-and-global-inequality-joseph-stiglitz.htm
39.UN Web TV . (2012 ) State of the Planet (film), Opening of the Conference – 1st Plenary Meeting, Rio+20 . https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1o/k1oma069n2
40.
Vidal
J.
(2020 ). ‘Tip of the iceberg’: Is our destruction of nature responsible for Covid-19? The Guardian , 18 March . https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/18/tip-of-the-iceberg-is-our-destruction-of-nature-responsible-for-covid-19-aoe?CMP=share_btn_tw
41.
Wissenburg
M.
(2018 ). The Anthropocene and the republic . Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops (pp. 10 –14 ) April 2018 , Nicosia , ECPR .