The ideal of emancipation has been traditionally grounded on the premise that human activity is not restrained by external boundaries. Thus the realisation of values such as autonomy or recognition has been facilitated by economic growth and material expansion. Yet there is mounting evidence that the human impact on natural systems at the planetary level, a novelty captured by the concept of the Anthropocene, endangers the Earth’s habitability. If human development is to be limited for the sake of global sustainability, can emancipation be kept as a mobilising ideal? As opposed to alternative views such as that of degrowth, this article argues that it can. The key lies in the ability of the Anthropocene to produce planetary subjectivities. By recognising the bounded quality of human embeddedness, the possibility of a different emancipation is opened up. The latter does not give up material well-being, yet it makes sure that the latter does not endanger planetary habitability.
BrunkhorstH. (2004). Critical theory and the analysis of contemporary mass society. In RushF. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to critical theory (pp. 248–279). Cambridge University Press.
16.
ButlerJ. (2016). Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In ButlerJ.GambettiZ.SabsayL. (Eds.), Vulnerability in resistance (pp. 12–27). Duke University Press.
17.
ChakrabartyD. (2008). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35, 197–222.
18.
CrownshawT.MorganC.AdamsA.SersM.dos SantosN. B.DamianoA.GilbertL.HaageG. Y.GreenfordD. H. (2018). Over the horizon: Exploring the conditions of a post-growth world. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1–2), 117–141.
19.
DanowskiB.Viveiros de CastroE. (2017). The ends of the world. Polity.
20.
DaviesJ. (2016). The birth of the Anthropocene. University of California Press.
21.
De GeusM. (1999). Ecological utopias. Envisioning the sustainable society. International Books.
22.
DemariaF.SchneiderF.SekulovaF.Martínez-AlierJ. (2013). What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement. Environmental Values, 22, 191–215.
23.
DeriuM. (2012). Democracies with a future: Degrowth and the democratic tradition. Futures, 44(6), 553–561.
24.
DobsonA. (2016). Are there limits to limits? In HallC.SchlosbergD.MeyerJ. M.GabrielsonT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 289–303). Oxford University Press.
25.
DouthwaiteR. (1993). The growth illusion. How economic growth has enriched the few, impoverished the many, and endangered the planet. Council Oak Books.
26.
DryzekJ.PickeringJ. (2019). The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford University Press.
27.
DworkinG. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
28.
EllisE. (2018). Anthropocene. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
29.
FoucaultM. (1986). The care of the self. Pantheon.
30.
FremauxA. (2019). After the Anthropocene: Green republicanism in a post-capitalist world. Palgrave.
31.
GambrelJ. C.CafaroP. (2010). The virtue of simplicity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(1–2), 85–108.
32.
GreeneJ. (2014). Moral tribes. Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Atlantic Books.
33.
GuilluyC. (2019). No society: La fin de la classe moyenne occidentale. Flammarion.
34.
HabermasJ. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Polity.
35.
HamiltonC. (2016). The Anthropocene as rupture. The Anthropocene Review, 3(2), 93–106.
36.
HarawayD. (2016). Staying with the trouble. Making kin in the Chthulucen. Duke University Press.
37.
HausknostD. (2019). The environmental state and the glass ceiling of transformation. Environmental Politics, 29(1), 17–37.
38.
HeinbergR. (2011). The end of growth. Adapting to our new economic reality. Clairview.
39.
HorkheimerM. (2013). Eclipse of reason. Bloomsbury.
40.
JacksonT. (2009). Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.
41.
JaeggiR. (2014). Kritik von lebensformen. Suhrkamp.
42.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane.
43.
KallisG. (2011). In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 70, 873–880.
44.
KallisG. (2019). Limits: Why malthus was wrong and why environmentalists should care. Stanford University Press.
45.
KanschikP. (2016). Eco-sufficiency and distributive sufficientarianism – Friends or foes?Environmental Values, 25, 553–571.
46.
KantI. (1992). The conflict of the faculties. University of Nebraska Press.
47.
KantI. (2009). An answer to the question: ‘What is enlightenment’?Penguin.
48.
KarlssonR. (2018). The high-energy planet. Global Change, Peace and Security, 30(1), 77–84.
LatourB. (2011). Love your monsters. Why we must care for our technologies as we do our children. Breakthrough Journal, 2, 17–25.
51.
LeporiM. (2015). There is no Anthropocene: Climate change, species-talk, and political economy. Telos, 172, 103–124.
52.
LewisM. (1992). Green delusions. An environmentalist critique of radical environmentalism. Duke University Press.
53.
LockeJ. (1988). Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press.
54.
MarcuseH. (2002). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge.
55.
MarxK. (2000a). Theses on Feuerbach. In McLellanD. (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected writings (pp. 171–174). Oxford University Press.
56.
MarxK. (2000b). On the Jewish question. In McLellanD. (Ed.), Karl Marx: Selected writings (pp. 46–70). Oxford University Press.
57.
MeadowsD.MeadowsD.RandersJ.BehrensW. W.III (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books.
58.
MeyerJ. (2016). Politics in—but not of—the Anthropocene. In EmmettR.LekanT. (Eds.), Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s ‘four theses’ (pp. 47–53). Rachel Carson Center Perspectives.
59.
MillJ. S. (2008). Principles of political economy. Oxford University Press.
60.
MillJ. S. (2015). On liberty, utilitarianism and other essays. Oxford University Press.
61.
MilliganB. (2013). Space-time vertigo. In EllsworthE.KruseJ. (Eds.), Making the geologic now: Responses to material conditions of contemporary life (pp. 123–130). Punctum Books.
62.
MolA. P. J.SonnenfeldD.SpaargarenG. (2009). The ecological modernisation reader. Routledge.
63.
MortonT. (2013). Hyperobjects. Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
64.
MythenG. (2004). Ulrich beck. A critical introduction to the risk society. Pluto Press.
65.
NordhausT.ShellenbergM. (2007). Break through. From the death of environmentalism to the politics of possibility. Houghton Mifflin.
66.
PaulsonS.KallisG.D’AlisaG.DemariaF. (2020). The case for degrowth. Polity.
67.
PichlerM.BrandU.GörgC. (2020). The double materiality of democracy in capitalist societies. Challenges for socio-ecological transformations. Environmental Politics, 29(2), 193–213.
68.
PrincenT. (2005). The logic of sufficiency. The MIT Press.
69.
RaffnsøeS. (2016). Philosophy of the Anthropocene: The human turn. Palgrave Macmillan.
70.
ReichelA.PereyR. (2018). Moving beyond growth in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review, 5(3), 242–249.
RomanoO. (2019). Towards a society of degrowth. Routledge.
73.
RortyR. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London.
74.
RousseauJ. J. (1984). A discourse on inequality. Penguin.
75.
SemalL. (2015). Anthropocene, catastrophism and green political theory. In HamiltonC.BonneuilC.GemenneF. (Eds.), The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. (pp. 87–99). Routledge.
76.
SrniceckN.WilliamsA. (2017). Accelerate manifiesto: For an acceleracionist politics. Mexico DF.
77.
SteffenW.PerssonA.DeutschL.ZalasiewiczJ.WilliamsM.RichardsonK.CrumleyC.CrutzenP.FolkeC.GordonL.MolinaM.RamanathanV.RockströmJ.SchefferM.SchellnhuberH. J.SvedinU. (2011). The Anthropocene. From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40(7), 739–761.
78.
SteffenW.RockströmJ.RichardsonK.LentonT. M.FolkeC.LivermanD.SummerhayesC. P.BarnoskyA. D.CornellS. E.CrucifixM.DongesJ. F.FetzerI.LadeS. J.SchefferM.WinkelmannR.SchellnhuberH. J.(2018). Trajectories in the earth system in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33), 8252–8259.
79.
StengersI. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. Open Humanities Press & Meson Press.
80.
SusenS. (2014). Emancipation. In GibbonsM. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of political thought. (pp. 1024–1038). Wiley-Blackwell.
81.
SymonsJ. (2019). Ecomodernism: Technology, politics, and the climate crisis. Polity Press.
82.
VetlesenA. (2015). The denial of nature: Environmental philosophy in the era of global capitalism. Routledge.
83.
VirilioP. (2007). The original accident. Polity.
84.
VogelS. (2016). Thinking like a mall. Environmental philosophy after the end of nature. The MIT Press.
85.
WeissM.CattaneoC. (2017). Degrowth – Taking stock and reviewing an emerging academic paradigm. Ecological Economics, 137, 220–230.
86.
ZalasiewiczJ.WatersC.WilliamsM.SummerhayesC. (2019). The Anthropocene as a geological time unit. A guide to the scientific evidence and current debate. Cambridge University Press.
