A stringent criterion for a public intellectual is proposed: persons who are simultaneously major creative intellectuals, and successful political leaders. Using data from the careers of 2700 philosophers throughout world history, and social scientists in recent centuries, the article concludes that three kinds of political failure by intellectuals are prominent: (1) failure to attain political office; (2) failure while in office; and (3) failure of political influence from adoption of one’s ideas. On the whole, major intellectuals are not good at politics; and politicians do not make outstanding intellectuals. The skills and pressures of the two spheres are too different.
BoddeDerek (1967) China’s First Unifier: A Study of the Ch’in Dynasty as Seen in the Life of Li Ssu. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
2.
Chambers Biographical Dictionary (1986) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CollinsRandall (1997) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
FabianiJean-Louis (2010) Qu’est-ce qu’un philosophe francais?La vie sociale des concepts (1880–1980). Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.
5.
LottmanHerbert (1979) Albert Camus: A Biography. New York: Doubleday.
6.
McAdamDougTarrowSidneyTillyCharles (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
SagemanMarc (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
8.
SwedbergRichard (2009) Tocqueville’s Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
TillyCharles (2008) Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Weber Max (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by Hans HGerth WrightMills C Oxford : Oxford University Press.
