For Social Identity Theory (SIT), identification with the ingroup category is a necessary condition for discrimination. In contrast, the Behavioral Interaction Model (BIM) proposes that self-interest and interdependence are at the root of discrimination. Using the minimal group paradigm, 96 undergraduates were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions. In the `interdependent' condition, participants received money depending on allocations made by ingroup and outgroup others in the experiment. In both the positively and negatively autonomous conditions, participants' personal self-gain was independent of the allocations made by ingroup and outgroup others in the experiment. Contrary to the BIM, autonomous individuals discriminated as much as interdependent respondents, and discrimination was unrelated to expectations of ingroup reciprocity. In line with SIT, correlational analyses indicated that only degree of ingroup identification measured prior to discrimination was associated with discriminatory behavior. Results also showed that both degree of social identification and quality of social identity measured after the resource allocation task were positively linked to discrimination.
Blanz, M. , Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1997). Normative evaluations and frequency expectations regarding positive versus negative outcome allocations between groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 165-176.
2.
Bourhis, R. Y. (1994a). Ethnic and language attitudes in Quebec. In J. W. Berry & J. A. Laponce (Eds.), Ethnicity and culture in Canada: The research landscape (pp. 322-360). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
3.
Bourhis, R. Y. (1994b). Power, gender and intergroup discrimination: Some minimal group experiments. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 171-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bourhis, R. Y. , & Gagnon, A. (1994). Les préjugés, la discrimination et les relations intergroupes. In R. J. Vallerand (Ed.), Les fondements de la psychologie social (pp. 708-773). Québec: Gaetan Morin Editeur.
5.
Bourhis, R. Y. , & Leyens, J. P. (1994). Perceptions et relations intergroupes: Deux solitudes. In R. Y. Bourhis & J. P. Leyens (Eds.), Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes (pp. 161-200). Liége: Mardaga.
6.
Bourhis, R. Y. , Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Bourhis, R. Y. , Turner, J. C., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Interdependence, social identity and discrimination. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 273-296). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
8.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
9.
Branscombe, N. R. , Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group and out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388.
10.
Brewer, M. B. (1994). The psychology of prejudice: Getting it all together. In M. Zanna & J. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 315-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12.
Brown, R. , Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
13.
Brown, R. , & Williams, J. (1984). Group identification: The same thing to all people. Human Relations, 7, 547-564.
14.
Brown, R. J. , Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Minimal group situations and intergroup discrimination: Comments on the paper by Aschenbrenner and Schaefer. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 399-414.
15.
Dawes, R. M. , van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. M. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us - Not me, or my conscience. In J.J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97-110). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Deauix, K. (1996). Social identification. In E. T. Higgins & A. R. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777-798). New York: Guilford.
17.
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester: Wiley.
18.
Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanations in social psychology. Cambridge: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme/Cambridge University Press.
19.
Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
20.
Gagnon, A. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289-1301.
21.
Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
22.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
23.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28-47). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
24.
Jetten, J. , Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
25.
Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57). Chichester: Wiley.
26.
Lambert, W. E. (1970). What are they like these Canadians? A social psychological analysis. Canadian Psychologist, 11, 303-333.
27.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
28.
Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
29.
Perreault, S. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (in press). Ethnocentrism, social identification and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
30.
Rabbie, J. (1991). Determinants of instrumental intra-group cooperation. In R. A. Hinde & J. Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Rabbie, J. M. , & Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117-123.
32.
Rabbie, J. , & Schot, J. C. (1990). Group behavior in the minimal group paradigm: Fact or fiction? In P. Drenth, J. Sergeant, & R. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology (Vol 3, pp. 251-263). New York: Wiley.
33.
Rabbie, J. M. , Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
34.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. (1984). Minimal majorities and minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 35-52.
35.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415-434.
36.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1987) Status differentials and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277-293.
37.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority/majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.
38.
Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
39.
Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F. & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
40.
Stern, P. C. (1995). Why do people sacrifice for their nations?Political Psychology, 16, 217-235.
41.
Tajfel, H. (1978). The psychological structure of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 27-100). Londoni: Academic Press.
42.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Tajfel, H. , Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
44.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
45.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social idenitity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
46.
Turner, J. C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
47.
Turner, J. C. (1983). Some comments on the measurement of social orientation is in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 351-367.
48.
Turner, J. C. (1996). Henri Tajfel: An introduction. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 1-24). Oxford: Butterworth/Heinemann.
49.
Turner, J. C. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social grouip: A reply to Rabbie et al. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 25-63). Oxford: Butterworth/Heinemann.
50.
Tturner, J. C. , Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
