We draw on self-determination theory and research on religious orientations to investigate motivations associated with collective narcissism—a belief in in-group greatness that is underappreciated by others—versus secure in-group identity, an unpretentious positive regard for the in-group. Four surveys examined these associations focusing on different social identities: personally important groups (Study 1, N = 212), nationalities (Study 2, N = 196), and religious groups (Study 3, N = 1,690; Study 4, N = 399). In Studies 1, 2, and 4, self-determined motivations were associated with secure in-group identity, whereas non-self-determined motivations were related to collective narcissism. In Studies 3 and 4, intrinsic religiosity was related to collective narcissism and secure in-group identity, while extrinsic personal religiosity was associated with collective narcissism only. Results indicate that collective narcissism is motivated by seeking external and internal rewards.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
2.
AdornoT.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper & Row.
3.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
4.
AmiotC. E.AubinR. (2013). Why and how are you attached to your social group? Investigating different forms of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12004
5.
AmiotC. E.SansfaçonS. (2011). Motivations to identify with social groups: A look at their positive and negative consequences. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023158
6.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP.VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.
7.
BeckR. (2006). Defensive versus existential religion: Is religious defensiveness predictive of worldview defense?Journal of Psychology and Theology, 34, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164710603400204
8.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
9.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
10.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291175001
11.
CaiH.GriesP. (2013). National narcissism: International dimensions and international correlates. PsyCh Journal, 2, 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.26
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 283–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
CichockaA.GolecdeZavalaA.MarchlewskaM.BilewiczM.JaworskaM.OlechowskiM. (2018). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality, 86, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12328
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Plenum.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
19.
DeMarcoT. C.NewheiserA. K. (2019). Attachment to groups: Relationships with group esteem, self-esteem, and investment in ingroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2500
20.
Dyduch-HazarK.MrozińskiB. (2021). Opposite associations of collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction with intergroup aggression via belief in the hedonistic function of revenge. PLoS ONE, 16, Article e0247814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247814
21.
EasterbrookM.VignolesV. L. (2012). Different groups, different motives: Identity motives underlying changes in identification with novel groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1066–1080. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212444614
22.
FaulF.EldfelderE.LangA.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
23.
FeaginJ. R. (1964). Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of southern fundamentalists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 4, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385200
24.
FisherC. D. (1978). The effects of personal control, competence, and extrinsic reward systems on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 21, 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90054-5
25.
FreemanM. A. (2003). Mapping multiple identities within the self-concept: Psychological constructions of Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict. Self and Identity, 1, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309023
26.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. Pimlico/Random House.
27.
FrommE. (1995). The art of loving. Thorsons. (Original work published 1957)
28.
GagnéM.DeciE. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26, 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
29.
GhorpadeJ.LackritzJ. R.MooreR. (2010). Intrinsic religious orientation: The conservative Christian connection. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2010.481230
30.
GilletN.GagnéM.SauvagèreS.FouquereauE. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees’ satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.665228
31.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2019). Collective narcissism and in-group satisfaction are associated with different emotional profiles and psychological well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00203
32.
Golec de ZavalaA.BierwiaczonekK. (2021). Male, national, and religious collective narcissism predict sexism. Sex Roles, 84, 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01193-3
33.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
34.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016904
35.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032215
36.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.OrehekE.AbdollahiA. (2012). Intrinsic religiosity reduces intergroup hostility under mortality salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1843
37.
Golec de ZavalaA.Dyduch-HazarK.LantosD. (2019). Collective narcissism: Consequences of investing worth in the ingroup’s image. Advances in Political Psychology, 40, 37–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12569
38.
Golec de ZavalaA.FedericoC. M.SedikidesC.GuerraR.LantosD.MrozińskiB.CypryańskaM.BaranT. (2020). Low self-esteem predicts out-group derogation via collective narcissism, but this relationship is obscured by in-group satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 741–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000260
39.
Golec de ZavalaA.PekerM.GuerraR.BaranT. (2016). Collective narcissism predicts hypersensitivity to in-group insult and direct and indirect retaliatory intergroup hostility. European Journal of Personality, 30, 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2067
40.
GórskaP.StefaniakA.MalinowskaK.LipowskaK.MarchlewskaM.BudziszewskaM.MaciantowiczO. (2019). Too great to act in solidarity: The negative relationship between collective narcissism and solidarity-based collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2638
41.
GorsuchR. L.McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386745
42.
GreenawayK. H.HaslamS. A.CruwysT.BranscombeN. R.YsseldykR.HeldrethC. (2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000019
43.
GreerT.BermanM.VaranV.BobryckiL.WatsonS. (2005). We are a religious people; we are a vengeful people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00264.x
44.
GronfeldtB.CichockaA.CislakA.SterniskoA.EkerI. (2022). A small price to pay: National narcissism predicts readiness to sacrifice in-group members to defend the in-group’s image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221074790
45.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352179
46.
HansenI. G.RyderA. (2016). In search of a “religion proper”: Intrinsic religiosity and coalitional rigidity make opposing predictions of intergroup hostility across religious groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 835–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116644983
HerekG. M. (1987). Religious orientation and prejudice: A comparison of racial and sexual attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287131003
49.
HodginsH. S.KneeC. R. (2002). The integrating self and conscious experience. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), The handbook of self-determination research (pp. 87–100). University of Rochester Press.
50.
HodginsH. S.KoestnerR.DuncanN. (1996). On the compatibility of autonomy and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223001
51.
HoggM. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000040
52.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
53.
HoggM. A.AdelmanJ. R.BlaggR. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349692
54.
HoverdW.SibleyC. G. (2010). Religious and denominational diversity in New Zealand 2009. New Zealand Sociology, 25, 59–88.
55.
HuntR. A.KingM. B. (1971). The intrinsic–extrinsic concept: A review and evaluation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 10, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1384780
56.
JaskoK.WebberD.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM.TaufiqurrohmanM.HettiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2019). Social context moderates the effects of quest for significance on violent extremism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000198
57.
JohnsonA. L.CrawfordM. T.ShermanS. J.RutchickA. M.HamiltonD. L.FerreiraM. B.PetrocelliJ. V. (2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.002
58.
KernisM. H.ParadiseA. W.WhitakerD. J.WheatmanS. R.GoldmanB. N. (2000). Master of one’s psychological domain? Not likely if one’s self-esteem is unstable. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262010
59.
KinnvallC. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology, 5, 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
60.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
61.
LantosD.ForgasJ. P. (2021). The role of collective narcissism in populist attitudes and the collapse of democracy in Hungary. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.80
62.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
63.
LegaultL.AmiotC. E. (2014). The role of autonomy in intergroup processes: Toward an integration of self-determination theory and intergroup approaches. In WeinsteinN. (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research and applications (pp. 159–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_8
64.
LonsdaleA.HodgeK.RoseE. (2009). Athlete burnout in elite sport: A self-determination perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410902929366
65.
LynchR.PalestisB. G.TriversR. (2017). Religious devotion and extrinsic religiosity affect in-group altruism and out-group hostility oppositely in rural Jamaica. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0103-y
66.
LyonsP. A.KenworthyJ.PopanJ. (2010). Ingroup identification and group level narcissism as predictors of U.S. citizens’ attitudes and behaviour toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210380604
67.
MaltbyJ. (1999). The internal structure of a derived, revised, and amended measure of religious orientation scale: The “Age-Universal” I-E Scale-12. Social Behaviour and Personality, 27, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1999.27.4.407
68.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.FurmanA.CislakA. (2021). Who respects the will of the people? High national narcissism predicts decreased support for democracy. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12499
69.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.JaworskaM.Golec de ZavalaA.BilewiczM. (2020). Superficial ingroup love? Collective narcissism predicts ingroup image defense, outgroup prejudice, and lower ingroup loyalty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12367
70.
MarchlewskaM.CichockaA.PanayiotouO.CastellanosK.BataynehJ. (2018). Populism as identity politics: Perceived in-group disadvantage, collective narcissism, and support for populism. Social and Personality Science, 9, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732393
71.
MiserandinoM. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.203
72.
MollerA. C.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288008
73.
NeyrinckB.LensW.VansteenkisteM. (2005). Goals and regulations of religiosity: A motivational analysis. In MaehrM. L.KarabenickS. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 77–106). Jai Press.
74.
NeyrinckB.LensW.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2010). Updating Allport’s and Batson’s framework of religious orientations: A reevaluation from the perspective of self-determination theory and Wulff’s social cognitive model. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01520.x
75.
NeyrinckB.VansteenkisteM.LensW.DuriezB.HutsebautD. (2006). Cognitive, affective and behavioral correlates of internalization of regulations for religious activities. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9048-3
76.
NixG. A.RyanR. M.ManlyJ. B.DeciE. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1382
77.
NtoumanisN.StandageM. (2009). Morality in sport: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200903036040
78.
PargamentK. I. (2002). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1303_02
79.
PelletierL. G.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BrièreN. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406
80.
RipB.VallerandR. J.LafrenièreM.-A. (2012). Passion for a cause, passion for a creed: On ideological passion, identity threat, and extremism. Journal of Personality, 80, 573–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00743.x
81.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
82.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In LearyM. R.TangneyJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 253–274). Guilford Press.
83.
RyanR. M.RigbyS.KingK. (1993). Two types of religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.586
84.
SchatzR. T.StaubE.LavineH. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140
85.
SedikidesC.GebauerJ. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351002
86.
SheldonK.BettencourtB. A. (2002). Psychological need-satisfaction and subjective well-being within social groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602165036
SiciliaA.Alcarez-IbáñezM.LirolaM. J.BurgueñoR.MaherA. (2018). Exercise motivational regulations and exercise addiction: The mediating role of passion. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7, 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.36
89.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
90.
TajfelH. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In TurnerJ. C.GilesH. (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 144–167). Basil Blackwell.
91.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall Publishers.
92.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge University Press.
93.
VallerandR. J.FortierM. S.GuayF. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
VerkuytenM.YildizA. A. (2007). National (dis)identification and ethnic and religious identity: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1448–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304276
96.
VignolesV. L. (2011). Identity motives. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 403–432). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9
97.
YsseldykR.MathesonK.AnismanH. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349693
98.
YustisiaW.PutraI. E.KavanaghC.WhitehouseH.RufaedahA. (2020). The role of religious fundamentalism and tightness–looseness in promoting collective narcissism and extreme group behaviour. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000269
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
