Ascribed and achieved characteristics influence individuals’ positions in a social hierarchy. I explore how status characteristics and status ideologies influence expectations about economic opportunities in the United Arab Emirates, a wealthy, highly diverse, and internationally stratified society where beliefs in meritocracy are nationally supported. In Studies 1 and 2, participants reported the extent to which they perceived various characteristics to influence an individual’s salary. Participants whose nationality placed them higher in the economic hierarchy expected achieved markers of status to play a larger role than ascribed markers in determining pay. Across groups, the more participants believed in meritocracy, the more they expected achieved markers to play a role. In Study 3, participants predicted the economic success of individuals who varied in ascribed and achieved characteristics. Across participant groups, both ascribed and achieved characteristics were expected to influence an individual’s economic success. Taken together, results suggested that both ascribed and achieved characteristics are expected to influence an individual’s position in the socioeconomic hierarchy, but only differences rooted in achieved characteristics are legitimized. Group differences and implications for system stability are discussed.
AndersonC.WillerR.KilduffG. J.BrownC. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027409
4.
BrandtM. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031751
5.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. O. (1989). Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial MI. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
6.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
JarvisB. G. (2012). MediaLab (Version 2012.4.120) [Computer software]. Empirisoft Corporation.
13.
JosephS. (2008). Familism and critical Arab family studies. In YountK. M.RashadH. (Eds.), Family in the Middle East: Ideational change in Egypt, Iran, and Tunisia (pp. 25–39). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203894057
14.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
15.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265003
16.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
17.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.SullivanB. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127
18.
KannaA. (2011). Dubai, the city as corporation: Young professionals and the limits of the neoliberal response. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsqq1
19.
LachmanM. E.WeaverS. L. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763
20.
LevinS.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.FedericoC. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00109
21.
LintonR. (1936). The study of man: An introduction. D. Appleton-Century Co.
22.
LipkusI. M.DalbertC.SieglerI. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296227002
23.
MaitnerA. T. (2015). Emotional reactions to unequal payment: The impact of meritocratic ideology and salary negotiability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214542255
24.
MaitnerA. T.DeCosterJ. (2015). Perceptions of national wealth and skill influence pay expectations: Replicating global hierarchy on a microscale. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00703
25.
MaitnerA. T.MackieD. M.PauketatJ. V. T.SmithE. R. (2017). The impact of culture and identity on emotional reactions to insults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 892–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117701194
26.
MaitnerA. T.Stewart-IngersollR. (2016). Social identity and peace in the modern Middle East: Insights from the United Arab Emirates. In McKeownS.HajiR.FergusonN. (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary and world-wide perspectives (pp. 317–331). Springer International Publishing.
27.
MaitnerA. T.SummervilleA. (2020). “What was meant to be” versus “what might have been”: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in counterfactual thinking. Unpublished manuscript.
28.
MajorB. M.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
MorlingB.KitayamaS.MiyamotoY. (2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286003
NydellM. K. (2012). Understanding Arabs: A contemporary guide to Arab society (5th ed.). Nicholas Brealey.
33.
O’BrienL.MajorB. (2005). System justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The role of group status and identity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205278261
34.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
35.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
36.
RashwanB.JenkinsJ. C. (2017). Fatalism and revolution: Expanding our understanding of fatalism during a unique political opening in Egypt. The Journal of North African Studies, 22, 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2017.1316716
37.
SagioglouC.ForstmannM.GreitemeyerT. (2019). Belief in social mobility mitigates hostility resulting from disadvantaged social standing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218789073
38.
San MartinA.SinaceurM.MadiA.TompsonS.MadduxW. W.KitayamaS. (2018). Self-assertive interdependence in Arab culture. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0435-z
39.
Savin-WilliamsR. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923–935. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129316
40.
SherifM.WhiteB. J.HarveyO. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1086/221569
41.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
