This article discusses the role that ideology plays in justifying and perpetuating group-based inequality. We begin by defining and describing status ideologies and their characteristics. We then review research illustrating how endorsing or rejecting status-legitimizing ideologies influences group stereotyping, group differences in perceived entitlement, and perceptions of discrimination. We next discuss how people respond to threats to their status ideology, affectively, cognitively, physiologically, and behaviorally. We close by considering the role of ideology in how high status groups respond to changes in the status hierarchy.
AbramsD.GrantP. R. (2012). Testing the social identity relative deprivation (SIRD) model of social change: The political rise of Scottish nationalism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 674–689. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02032.x
2.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
3.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.882
4.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.96.4.608
5.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2016). Members of high-status groups are threatened by pro-diversity organizational messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.006
6.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KunstmanJ. W.SawyerP. J. (2015). Does unfairness feel different if it can be linked to group membership? Cognitive, affective, behavioral and physiological implications of discrimination and unfairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.003
7.
EliezerD.MajorB. (2012). It’s not your fault: The social costs of claiming discrimination on behalf of someone else. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 487–502. doi:10.1177/1368430211432894
8.
EllemersN. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57. doi:10.1080/14792779343000013
9.
GreenbergJ.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61–139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
HeineS. J.ProulxT.VohsK. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1
11.
HoggM. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69–126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
HoggM. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 338–342. doi:10.1177/0963721414540168
13.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London, UK: Routledge.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2004.00402.x
16.
JostJ. T.BurgessD. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305. doi:10.1177/0146167200265003
17.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963–7214.2005.00377.x
18.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.CarvalloM. R. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602. doi:10.1016/S0022–1031(02)00505-X
19.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP. S.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly?: A test of system and group justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523–1536. doi:10.1177/0146167206291475
20.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010
21.
KaiserC. R.VickS. B.MajorB. (2006). Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychological Science, 17, 332–338. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01707.x
22.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893–905. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.55.6.893
23.
KluegelJ. R.SmithE. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
24.
MajorB. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
MajorB.BlodornA.BlascovichG. M. (2016). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430216677304
26.
MajorB.GramzowR.McCoyS. K.LevinS.SchmaderT.SidaniusJ. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and status legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782–796. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.82.3.269
27.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.92.6.1068
28.
MajorB.McFarlinD. B.GagnonD. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.47.6.1399
29.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
30.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. doi:10.1177/1088868312440048
31.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215–218. doi:10.1177/1745691611406922
32.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. N.GilbertP. N. (2012). Gender differences in entitlement: The role of system-justifying beliefs. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34, 136–145. doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.655630
33.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In SnidermanP.TetlockP. E. (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and race in America today (pp. 173–211). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
36.
TownsendS. S.MajorB.SawyerP. J.MendesW. B. (2010). Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one’s worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 933–947. doi:10.1037/a0020434
37.
WellmanJ. D.LiuX.WilkinsC. L. (2015). Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for affirmative action among White people. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 426–437. doi:48/10.1111/bjso.12133
38.
WesselmannE.WilliamsK. (2017). Social life and social death: Inclusion, ostracism, and rejection in groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(5): 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217708861
39.
WilkinsC. L.HirschA. A.KaiserC. R.InklesM. P. (2016). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430216631030
40.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25, 439–446. doi:10.1177/0956797613508412
41.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.KaiserC. R. (2013). Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1114–1119. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017
42.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.SchadK. D. (2015). Reactions to anti-male sexism claims: The moderating roles of status-legitimizing belief endorsement and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 173–185. doi:10.1177/1368430215595109
43.
ZelditchM.Jr.(2001). Theories of legitimacy. In JostJ.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 33–53). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
