Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Those on the political right engage in greater meat consumption and animal exploitation than their left-wing counterparts. Previous research suggests this is because they view vegetarianism as threatening the nation’s dietary customs and economy. Across two studies, I extend this concept of “vegetarianism threat” by showing that it separates into two distinct dimensions of concern: cultural (symbolic) threats and economic (realistic) threats. The resultant multidimensional scale allows a finer grained understanding of the roots of ideology-based threat responses to meat-free movements. Together, results implicate symbolic concerns as the key element of vegetarianism threat contributing to negative attitudes towards meat abstention and its proponents.

Keywords

intergroup threat theory right-wing authoritarianism social dominance orientation speciesism veg*nism vegetarianism threat

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1988). The other “authoritarian personality.” In Zanna

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). Academic Press.

Associated Press. (2020, October 23). European farmers lose attempt to ban terms such as veggie burger. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/23/european-farmers-lose-attempt-to-ban-terms-such-veggie-burger

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Australian farming and farmers. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/4102.0main+features10dec+2012#FARMERS%20IN

BBC News. (2019, April 8). Vegan protests: “Un-Australian” activists arrested, PM Morrison says. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-47848674

Berger

(2020, October 23). E.U. rejects proposal to ban labeling plant-based foods as veggie “burgers.” The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/10/23/eu-rejects-proposal-ban-labeling-plant-based-foods-veggie-burgers/

Brett

(2019). From secret ballot to democracy sausage: How Australia got compulsory voting. Text Publishing Melbourne Australia.

Bridge

(2019, October 29). Ryan Bridge: Kiwi vegan loonies are treasonous. Newshub. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/lifestyle/2019/10/ryan-bridge-kiwi-vegan-loonies-are-treasonous.html?fbclid=IwAR3rXZiM1bF-f-Uoz11jjX8QAFZMqDghsYtS1HNZmUZ24fuDCCZ-jE1JFMo

Cantal

Milfont

T. L.

Wilson

M. S.

Gouveia

V. V.

(2015). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1978

Changing Markets Foundation. (2018). Growing the good: The case for low-carbon transition in the food sector. https://www.mightyearth.org/wp-content/uploads/Growing-the-Good-final-report-for-website.pdf

10.

Clarke

E. J.

Ling

Kothe

E. J.

Klas

Richardson

(2019). Mitigation system threat partially mediates the effects of right-wing ideologies on climate change beliefs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12585

11.

Copa-Cogeca. (2020, October 6). Enough with surrealistic meat and dairy denominations! European livestock organisations are launching a campaign against the misuse of meat denominations [Press release]. https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/PRESS-RELEASE-Enough-with-surrealistic-meat-and-dairy-denominations–31491267/

12.

Costello

Hodson

(2010). Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal–human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209347725

13.

Costello

Hodson

(2014). Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016

14.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects white Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993

15.

Daniel

Cross

Koebnick

Sinha

(2011). Trends in meat consumption in the United States. Public Health Nutrition, 14, 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010002077

16.

Dhont

Hodson

(2014). Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.002

17.

Dhont

Hodson

Costello

MacInnis

C. C.

(2014). Social dominance orientation connects prejudicial human–human and human–animal relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 61, 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.020

18.

Dhont

Hodson

Leite

A. C.

(2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069

19.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6

20.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianian-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x

21.

Duckitt

Fisher

(2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00322

22.

Feygina

Jost

J. T.

Goldsmith

R. E.

(2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435

23.

Geiger

J. L.

Steg

van der Werff

Ünal

A. B.

(2019). A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 64, 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.004

24.

Graça

Calheiros

M. M.

Oliveira

(2016). Situating moral disengagement: Motivated reasoning in meat consumption and substitution. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.042

25.

Graça

Calheiros

M. M.

Oliveira

Milfont

T. L.

(2018). Why are women less likely to support animal exploitation than men? The mediating roles of social dominance orientation and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.007

26.

Graça

Godinho

C. A.

Truninger

(2019). Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets: Current evidence and future directions to inform integrated transitions. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.046

27.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

28.

Hodson

Earle

(2018). Conservatism predicts lapses from vegetarian/vegan diets to meat consumption (through lower social justice concerns and social support). Appetite, 120, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.027

29.

Hoffarth

M. R.

Hodson

(2016). Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.002

30.

Hornsey

M. J.

Harris

E. A.

Bain

P. G.

Fielding

K. S.

(2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943

31.

Hornsey

M. J.

Harris

E. A.

Fielding

K. S.

(2018). Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change, 8, 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2

32.

Hrynowski

(2019). What percentage of Americans are vegetarian? Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/267074/percentage-americans-vegetarian.aspx

33.

Huddart Kennedy

Krahn

Krogman

N. T.

(2015). Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint. Local Environment, 20, 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.837039

34.

Jaccard

Weber

Lundmark

(1975). A multitrait-multimethod analysis of four attitude assessment procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(75)80017-5

35.

JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].

36.

Jones

J. M.

(2016). Americans’ identification as “environmentalists” down to 42%. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/190916/americans-identification-environmentalists-down.aspx

37.

Joy

(2020). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Red Wheel.

38.

Judge

Wilson

M. S.

(2015). Vegetarian utopias: Visions of dietary patterns in future societies and support for social change. Futures, 71, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.07.005

39.

Kurz

Prosser

A. M.

Rabinovich

O’Neill

(2020). Could vegans and lycra cyclists be bad for the planet? Theorizing the role of moralized minority practice identities in processes of societal-level change. Journal of Social Issues, 76, 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12366

40.

Landmann

Gaschler

Rohmann

(2019). What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593

41.

Lowery

(2019). Fake meat bill passes house, heads to senate. Mississippi Farm Bureau Federation. https://msfb.org/2019/01/25/fake-meat-bill-passes-house-heads-to-senate/

42.

MacInnis

C. C.

Hodson

(2017). It ain’t easy eating greens: Evidence of bias toward vegetarians and vegans from both source and target. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 721–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215618253

43.

Meat & Livestock Australia. (2019). About MLA. https://www.mla.com.au/about-mla/#

44.

Milfont

T. L.

Richter

Sibley

C. G.

Wilson

M. S.

Fischer

(2013). Environmental consequences of the desire to dominate and be superior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1127–1138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490805

45.

Milfont

T. L.

Sibley

C. G.

(2014). The hierarchy enforcement hypothesis of environmental exploitation: A social dominance perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.006

46.

Nagtzaam

Lentini

(2007). Vigilantes on the high seas?: The Sea Shepherds and political violence. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20, 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550701723658

47.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Meat consumption. https://data.oecd.org/agroutput/meat-consumption.htm

48.

Plant Based Foods Association. (2020, July 9). Plant-based meat sales increase an average of 23% when sold in the meat department [Press release]. https://plantbasedfoods.org/plant-based-meat-sales-increase-an-average-of-23-when-sold-in-the-meat-department/

49.

Rabès

Seconda

Langevin

Allès

Touvier

Hercberg

Lairon

Baudry

Pointereau

Kesse-Guyot

(2020). Greenhouse gas emissions, energy demand and land use associated with omnivorous, pesco-vegetarian, vegetarian, and vegan diets accounting for farming practices. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.02.010

50.

Riek

B. M.

Mania

E. W.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4

51.

Rios

Sosa

Osborn

(2018). An experimental approach to intergroup threat theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat. European Review of Social Psychology, 29, 212–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049

52.

Ritchie

(2019). Where in the world do people emit the most CO₂? Our World Data. https://ourworldindata.org/per-capita-co2#:~:text=Australia%20has%20an%20average%20per,was%204.8%20tonnes%20per%20person

53.

Rosseel

(2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

54.

Roy Morgan. (2016). The slow but steady rise of vegetarianism in Australia. http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/vegetarianisms-slow-but-steady-rise-in-australia-201608151105

55.

Sareen

(2013, April 3). Interest in vegan diets on the rise: Google Trends notes public’s increased curiosity in veganism. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/interest-in-vegan-diets-on-the-rise_n_3003221

56.

Scarborough

Appleby

P. N.

Mizdrak

Briggs

A. D.

Travis

R. C.

Bradbury

K. E.

Key

T. J.

(2014). Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Climatic Change, 125, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1169-1

57.

Schoemann

A. M.

Boulton

A. J.

Short

S. D.

(2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068

58.

Siskind

(1992). The invention of Thanksgiving: A ritual of American nationality. Critique of Anthropology, 12, 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9201200205

59.

Stanley

S. K.

Wilson

M. S.

(2019). Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.002

60.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Lawrence Erlbaum.

61.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Bachman

(1999). Prejudice towards immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.x

62.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Rios Morrison

(2009). Intergroup threat theory. In Pelinka

Bischof

Stögner

(Eds), Handbook of prejudice (pp. 43–59). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

63.

United States Department of Agriculture. (2020). Ag and food sectors and the economy. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/#:~:text=Agriculture%2C%20food%2C%20and%20related%20industries,about%200.6%20percent%20of%20GDP

64.

Varotto

Spagnolli

(2017). Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.011

65.

Wood

(2016, August 1). Vegetarians, vegans “hated and bullied in Australia,” author says. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-02/vegetarians-vegans-hated-bullied-australia-richard-cornish/7680900

66.

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). (2018). Australian attitudes to nature 2017. https://www.wwf.org.au/ArticleDocuments/353/pub-backyard-barometer-australian-attitudes-to-nature-05jun18.pdf.aspx

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Ideological bases of attitudes towards meat abstention: Vegetarianism as a threat to the cultural and economic status quo

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material