Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Past research has found need for closure (NFC; a preference for cognitive simplicity) to be an especially relevant predictor of negative evaluations of bisexual people. We extended this work in two survey-based, correlational studies by examining NFC, social dominance orientation (SDO), and conservatism as predictors of negative judgments of bisexual and nonbinary people, two groups that may be perceived as “complicating” identity categorization. Study 1 (N = 498) showed that NFC was not an especially strong predictor of negative judgments of nonbinary and bisexual targets. Rather, SDO and conservatism were more strongly associated with negative judgments of nonbinary people compared to sexual minority targets. Study 2 (N = 536) replicated these findings and yielded similar effects for negative judgments of transgender targets compared to sexual minority targets. Our findings suggest that ideological differences are currently pertinent to understanding judgments of nonbinary and transgender people.

Keywords

bisexual conservatism LGBTQ+need for closure nonbinary prejudice social dominance orientation transgender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G. W.

(1954). The nature of prejudice. Perseus Books.

American Civil Liberties Union. (2024, December 8). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ+ rights in U.S. state legislators in 2024. https://www.aclu.org/legislative-attacks-on-lgbtq-rights-2024

Barbee

Deal

Gonzales

(2022). Anti-transgender legislation—a public health concern for transgender youth. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(2), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4483

Barrow

(2024, November 1). Trump and Vance make anti-transgender attacks central to their campaign’s closing argument. The Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/trump-harris-transgender-politics-61cff97a64fac581ffc5f762be4c57d3

Brekhus

(1998). A sociology of the unmarked: Redirecting our focus. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00041

Burke

S. E.

Dovidio

J. F.

LaFrance

Przedworski

J. M.

Perry

S. P.

Phelan

S. M.

Burgess

D. J.

Hardeman

R. R.

Yeazel

M. W.

van Ryn

(2017). Beyond generalized sexual prejudice: Need for closure predicts negative attitudes toward bisexual people relative to gay/lesbian people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.003

Burke

S. E.

LaFrance

(2016). Lay conceptions of sexual minority groups. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(3), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0655-5

Burke

S. E.

LaFrance

(2018). Perceptions of instability and choice across sexual orientation groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663019

Burke

S. E.

Perry

S. P.

Dovidio

J. F.

LaFrance

(2023). Distinctive negative reactions to intermediate social groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(7), 600–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12942

10.

Conlin

S. E.

Douglass

R. P.

Larson-Konar

D. M.

Gluck

M. S.

Fiume

Heesacker

(2019). Exploring nonbinary gender identities: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 13(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2019.1597818

11.

DeMillo

Hanna

(2024, February 27). Some states seek to deny transgender and nonbinary people’s rights by legally defining sex. PBS News. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/some-states-seek-to-deny-transgender-and-nonbinary-peoples-rights-by-legally-defining-sex

12.

Dray

K. K.

Smith

V. R. E.

Kostecki

T. P.

Sabat

I. E.

Thomson

C. R.

(2020). Moving beyond the gender binary: Examining workplace perceptions of nonbinary and transgender employees. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(6), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12455

13.

Fiani

C. N.

Han

H. J.

(2019). Navigating identity: Experiences of binary and non-binary transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) adults. International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(2–3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1426074

14.

Goel

(2016). Hijra communities of Delhi. Sexualities, 19(5–6), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460715616946

15.

Goldberg

A. E.

Kuvalanka

K. A.

(2018). Navigating identity development and community belonging when “there are only two boxes to check”: An exploratory study of nonbinary trans college students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 15(2), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2018.1429979

16.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141

17.

Greytak

(2024, September 11). The impacts of anti-transgender laws and policies: Evidence from empirical research. American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/publications/the-impacts-of-anti-transgender-laws-and-policies-evidence-from-empirical-research

18.

Hassan

(2024, March 21). States passed a record number of transgender laws. Here’s what they say. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/27/us/transgender-laws-states.html

19.

Hatch

H. A.

Warner

R. H.

Broussard

K. A.

Harton

H. C.

(2022). Predictors of transgender prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 87(11–12), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01338-6

20.

Herdt

(Ed.). (1994). Third sex, third gender: Beyond sexual dimorphism in culture and history. Zone Books.

21.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

22.

Johnson

K. C.

LeBlanc

A. J.

Deardorff

Bockting

W. O.

(2020). Invalidation experiences among nonbinary adolescents. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1608422

23.

Krishnakumar

Cole

(2022, July 17). 2022 is already a record year for state bills seeking to curtail LGBTQ rights, ACLU data shows. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/17/politics/state-legislation-lgbtq-rights/index.html

24.

Lickel

Hamilton

D. L.

Wieczorkowska

Lewis

Sherman

S. J.

Uhles

A. N.

(2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.223

25.

Makwana

A. P.

Dhont

De keersmaecker

Akhlaghi-Ghaffarokh

Masure

Roets

(2018). The motivated cognitive basis of transphobia: The roles of right-wing ideologies and gender role beliefs. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 79(3–4), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0860-x

26.

McCarty

M. K.

Burt

A. H.

(2024). Understanding perceptions of gender non-binary people: Consensual and unique stereotypes and prejudice. Sex Roles, 90(3), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-024-01449-2

27.

McInnis

M. K.

Gauvin

S. E. M.

Blair

K. L.

Pukall

C. F.

(2022). Where does the “b” belong?: Anti-bisexual experiences, self-stigma, and bisexual individuals’ sense of belonging. Journal of Bisexuality, 22(3), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2022.2031368

28.

Mohr

J. J.

Rochlen

A. B.

(1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(3), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.353

29.

Onraet

van Hiel

Roets

Cornelis

(2011). The closed mind: “Experience” and “cognition” aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right-wing attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 25(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.775

30.

Pinheiro

Bates

, & R Core Team. (2025). Nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package Version 3.1-167) [Computer software]. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=nlme

31.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

32.

Richards

Bouman

W. P.

Seal

Barker

M. J.

Nieder

T. O.

T’Sjoen

(2016). Nonbinary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446

33.

Robinson

(2017). Two-Spirit and bisexual people: Different umbrella, same rain. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2016.1261266

34.

Roets

van Hiel

(2011a). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411424894

35.

Roets

van Hiel

(2011b). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004

36.

Serpe

Brown

Criss

Lamkins

Watson

(2020). Bisexual women: Experiencing and coping with objectification, prejudice, and erasure. Journal of Bisexuality, 20(4), 456–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2020.1820421

37.

Smout

S. A.

Benotsch

E. G.

(2022). Experiences of discrimination, mental health, and substance use among bisexual young adults. Journal of Bisexuality, 22(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2022.2116514

38.

Sparkman

D. J.

Blanchar

J. C.

(2017). Examining relationships among epistemic motivation, perspective taking, and prejudice: A test of two explanatory models. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.049

39.

Stryker

(2017). Transgender history: The history of today’s revolution (2nd ed.). Seal Press.

40.

Tebbe

E. N.

Moradi

(2012). Anti-transgender prejudice: A structural equation model of associated constructs. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026990

41.

Valen

B. M.

Burke

S. E.

(2024). Sexual minority and religious majority: Nonreligious gay/lesbian people’s and cisgender heterosexual Christians’ evaluations of gay and lesbian Christians. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000726

42.

Vijlbrief

Saharso

Ghorashi

(2020). Transcending the gender binary: Gender nonbinary young adults in Amsterdam. Journal of LGBT Youth, 17(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2019.1660295

43.

Webster

D. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049

44.

Weisberg

H. F.

Miller

A. H.

(1979). Evaluation of the feeling thermometer: A report to the National Election Study Board based on data from the 1979 pilot survey (ANES Pilot Study Report nes002241). American National Election Studies. https://electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/nes002241.pdf

45.

Whitley

B. E.

Jr. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802471104

46.

Wilcox

R. R.

Tian

(2008). Comparing dependent correlations. Journal of General Psychology, 135(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.135.1.105-112

47.

Youssef

C. P.

(2012). Constructing and validating the Attitudes Toward Transgender Spectrum Identities Scale [Unpublished master’s thesis]. San Francisco State University.

Going beyond a binary system of categorization? Social dominance orientation and conservatism predict negative evaluations of bisexual people and (especially) nonbinary and transgender people

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References