Identity fusion, a visceral union between personal and group identity is considered to be triggered and maintained by collective rituals with certain characteristics (e.g., opaque causal actions, synchrony, high excitement) and by recalling such rituals. The purpose of the present research was to determine the factors that maintain identity fusion after taking part in the pilgrimage of the Way of Saint James. We conducted a study with pilgrims (N = 609) to analyze the factors associated with the characteristics of rituals (Wave 1; finishing point of the pilgrimage) and the sharing of episodic memories (Wave 2; three months later) that contribute to maintaining identity fusion. Results indicated that engaging in ritual practices and recalling episodic memories of the pilgrimage through contact with other pilgrims contribute to maintaining identity fusion. The importance of contact after taking part in the ritual is discussed.
AllportG. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (2001). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In ClarkM.FletcherG. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook in social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478–501). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3.
BestaT. (2017). Independent and interdependent? Agentic and communal? Self-construals of people fused with a group. Anales de Psicología, 34, 123–134. doi:10.6018/analesps.34.1.266201
4.
BestaT.GómezÁ.VázquezA. (2014). Readiness to deny group’s wrongdoing and willingness to fight for its members: The role of Poles’ identity fusion with the country and religious group. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 1, 49–55. doi:10.5114/cipp.2014.43101
BortoliniT.NewsonM.NatividadeJ. C.VázquezA.GómezÁ. (2018). Identity fusion predicts endorsement of pro-group behaviours targeting nationality, religion, or football in Brazilian samples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 346–366. doi:10.1111/bjso.12235
7.
BuhrmesterM. D.FraserW. T.LanmanJ. A.WhitehouseH.SwannW. B. (2014). When terror hits home: Fused Americans saw Boston bombing victims as “family” and rushed to their aid. Self and Identity, 14, 253–270. doi:10.1080/15298868.2014.992465
8.
CialdiniR. B.BrownS. L.LewisB. P.LuceC.NeubergS. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.481
9.
DovidioJ. F.LoveA.SchellhaasF. M. H.HewstoneM. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 606–620. doi:10.1177/1368430217712052
10.
DugasM.BélangerJ. J.MoyanoM.SchumpeB. M.KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM. J.. . . NocitiN. (2016). The quest for significance motivates self-sacrifice. Motivation Science, 2, 15–32. doi:10.1037/mot0000030
11.
DurkheimE. (1964). The division of labor in society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
12.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
13.
FiskeA. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
FiskeS.MoyaM.RussellA. M.BearnsC. (2012). The secret handshake: Trust in cross-class encounters. In FiskeS. T.MarkusR. (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
FredmanL. A.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezA.FraserW. T.TalaifarS.BrannonS. M.SwannW. B. (2015). Identity fusion, extreme pro-group behavior, and the path to defusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 468–480. doi:10.1111/spc3.12193
16.
GómezA.BrooksM. L.BuhrmesterM. D.VázquezA.JettenJ.SwannW. B. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 918–933. doi:10.1037/a0022642
17.
GómezA.López-RodríguezL.SheikhH.GingesJ.WilsonL.WaziriH.. . . AtranS. (2017). The devoted actor’s will to fight and the spiritual dimension of human conflict. Nature. Human Behaviour, 1, 673–679. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0193-3
18.
GómezÁ.MoralesJ. F.HartS.VázquezA.SwannW. B. (2011). Rejected and excluded forevermore, but even more devoted: Irrevocable ostracism intensifies loyalty to the group among identity-fused persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1574–1586. doi:10.1177/0146167211424580
19.
GómezÁ.VázquezA. (2015). The power of “feeling one” with a group: Identity fusion and extreme pro-group behaviours / El poder de “sentirse uno” con un grupo: Fusión de la identidad y conductas progrupales extremas. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 481–511. doi:10.1080/02134748.2015.1065089
20.
HobsonN. M.SchroederJ.RisenJ. L.XygalatasD.InzlichtM. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 260–284. doi:10.1177/1088868317734944
21.
JensenM. P.KarolyP. (2001). Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults. In TurkD. C.MelzackR. (Eds.), Handbook of pain assessment (pp. 15–34). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
22.
JongJ.WhitehouseH.KavanaghC.LaneJ. (2015). Shared negative experiences lead to identity fusion via personal reflection. PLoS One, 10, 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145611
23.
KimB.KimS. S.KingB. (2016). The sacred and the profane: Identifying pilgrim traveler value orientations using means–end theory. Tourism Management, 56, 142–155. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.04.003
24.
KruglanskiA. W.GelfandM. J.BélangerJ. J.ShevelandA.HetiarachchiM.GunaratnaR. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93. doi:10.1111/pops.12163
25.
LaunayJ.DeanR. T.BailesF. (2014). Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability. Cognitive Processing, 15, 491–501. doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0618-0
26.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self-implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
27.
McNeillW. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
NewsonM.BuhrmesterM.WhitehouseH. (2016). Explaining lifelong loyalty: The role of identity fusion and self-shaping group events. PLoS One, 11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160427
29.
OviedoL.de CourcierS.FariasM. (2014). Rise of pilgrims on the Camino to Santiago: Sign of change or religious revival?Review of Religious Research, 56, 433–442. doi:10.1007/s13644-013-0131-4
30.
PáezD.RiméB.BasabeN.WlodarczykA.ZumetaL. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 711–729. doi:10.1037/pspi0000014
31.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
ReddishP.TongE. M. W.JongJ.LanmanJ. A.WhitehouseH. (2016). Collective synchrony increases prosociality towards non-performers and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 722–738. doi:10.1111/bjso.12165
34.
RichertR. A.WhitehouseH.StewartE. (2005). Memory and analogical thinking in high-arousal rituals. In WhitehouseH.McCauleyR. N. (Eds.), Mind and religion: Psychological and cognitive foundations of religiosity (pp. 127–146). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
35.
RussellY. I.GobetF.WhitehouseH. (2016). Mood, expertise, analogy, and ritual: An experiment using the five-disk Tower of Hanoi. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6, 67–87. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2014.921861
36.
SagemanM. (2004). Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
SandínB.ChorotP.LostaosL.JoinerT. E.SantedM. A.ValienteR. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural [The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence]. Psicothema, 11, 37–51. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=229
38.
SchnellT.PaliS. (2013). Pilgrimage today: The meaning-making potential of ritual. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 16, 887–902. doi:10.1080/13674676.2013.766449
39.
SwannW. B.BuhrmesterM. D. (2015). Identity fusion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 52–57. doi:10.1177/0963721414551363
40.
SwannW. B.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezÁ.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.. . . ZhangA. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912–926. doi:10.1037/a0036089
41.
SwannW. B.GómezÁ.BuhrmesterM. D.López-RodríguezL.JiménezJ.VázquezA. (2014). Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: Identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 713–727. doi:10.1037/a0035809
42.
SwannW. B.GómezÁ.HuiciC.MoralesJ. F.HixonJ. G. (2010). Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: Arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 824–841. doi:10.1037/a0020014
43.
SwannW. B.GómezÁ.SeyleD. C.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995–1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668
44.
SwannW. B.JettenJ.GómezÁ.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441–456. doi:10.1037/a0028589
45.
TrujilloH.JordánJ.GutiérrezJ.González-CabreraJ. (2009). Radicalization in prisons? Field research in 25 Spanish prisons. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 558–579. doi:10.1080/09546550903153134
46.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
47.
VázquezA.GómezA.OrdoñanaJ. R.SwannW. B.WhitehouseH. (2017). Sharing genes fosters identity fusion and altruism. Self and Identity, 16, 684–702. doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1296887
48.
VázquezA.GómezÁ.SwannW. B. (2017). Do historic threats to the group diminish identity fusion and its correlates?Self and Identity, 16, 480–503. doi:10.1080/15298868.2016.1272485
49.
WhitehouseH. (1995). Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
WhitehouseH. (2013). Three wishes for the world (with comment). Cliodynamics, 4, 281–323. doi:10.21237/C7clio4221338
51.
WhitehouseH. (2015). Explaining religion and ritual. In AlmqvistK.LinklaterA. (Eds.), Religion: Perspectives from the Engelsberg Seminar 2014 (pp. 261–270). Stockholm, Sweden: Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation.
52.
WhitehouseH. (2018). Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41. doi:10.1017/S0140525X18000249
53.
WhitehouseH.FrançoisP. (2017). Afterword: Ritual, emotion and power. In BaileyM. L.BarclayK. (Eds.), Emotion, ritual and power in Europe, 1200–1920 (pp. 285–303). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
54.
WhitehouseH.LanmanJ. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55, 674–695. doi:10.1086/678698
55.
WhitehouseH.McQuinnB.BuhrmesterM.SwannW. B. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 17783–17785. doi:10.1073/pnas.1416284111
56.
XygalatasD. (2007). Firewalking in northern Greece: A cognitive approach to high-arousal rituals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
