Italian mafia-type groups exert governance over the community. To do so, they must engage in contact with community members. Previous research indicates that individuals’ endorsement of masculine honour values is associated with more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations (COs). The present research examines the relationship between masculine honour and both positive and negative contact, as well as the potential implications of such contact. Structural equation modelling of survey data (N = 327) revealed that masculine honour was associated with positive but not negative contact with COs’ members. Positive contact was, in turn, associated with a stronger tendency to see COs as matching the ideals of honour (romanticisation), and lower perceived threat. In contrast, negative contact was associated with stronger perceived threat from COs’ presence. Finally, romanticisation and lower perceived threat were associated with lower intentions to engage in social activism against COs. Results support the idea that cultural values of masculine honour make the presence of COs in society more acceptable and are an important predictor of contact with this type of group.
AbersonC. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760. doi:10.1177/1368430214556699
2.
AbersonC. L. (2019). Indirect effects of threat on the contact–prejudice relationship: A meta-analysis. Social Psychology, 50, 105–126. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000364
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
4.
BanfieldE. C. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R. M.HarwoodJ.. . .SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
6.
BarnesC. D.BrownR. P.LenesJ.BossonJ.CarvalloM. (2014). My country, my self: Honor, identity, and defensive responses to national threats. Self and Identity, 13, 638–662. doi:10.1080/15298868.2014.892529
7.
BarnesC. D.BrownR. P.OstermanL. L. (2012). Don’t tread on me: Masculine honor ideology in the U.S. and militant responses to terrorism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1018–1029. doi:10.1177/0146167212443383
8.
BoccatoG.CapozzaD.TrifilettiE.Di BernardoG. A. (2015). Attachment security and intergroup contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 629–647. doi:10.1111/jasp.12325
9.
CakalH.HewstoneM.SchwärG.HeathA. (2011). An investigation of the social identity model of collective action and the “sedative” effect of intergroup contact among Black and White students in South Africa. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 606–627. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02075.x
10.
CohenD.NisbettR. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551–567. doi:10.1177/0146167294205012
11.
CohenD.NisbettR. E. (1997). Field experiments examining the culture of honor: The role of institutions in perpetuating norms about violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1188–1199. doi:10.1177/01461672972311006
12.
CohenD.NisbettR. E.BowdleB. F.SchwarzN. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–959. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.945
13.
Correa-CabreraG.KeckM.NavaJ. (2015). Losing the monopoly of violence: The state, a drug war and the paramilitarization of organized crime in Mexico (2007–10). State Crime Journal, 4, 77–95. doi:10.13169/statecrime.4.1.0077
14.
DhontK.CornelisI.van HielA. (2010). Interracial public–police contact: Relationships with police officers’ racial and work-related attitudes and behavior. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 551–560. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.07.004
15.
DhontK.van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
16.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002214
17.
DruryL.AbramsD.SwiftH. J.LamontR. A.GerocovaK. (2017). Can caring create prejudice? An investigation of positive and negative intergenerational contact in care settings and the generalisation of blatant and subtle age prejudice to other older people. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 65–82. doi:10.1002/casp.2294
18.
EmlerN.ReicherS. D. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
FiskeA. P.RaiT. S. (2014). Virtuous violence: Hurting and killing to create, sustain, end, and honor social relationships. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GrafS.PaoliniS. (2017). Investigating positive and negative intergroup contact. In VezzaliS.StathiS. (Eds.), Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 92–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2052
23.
HarinckF.ShafaS.EllemersN.BeersmaB. (2013). The good news about honor culture: The preference for cooperative conflict management in the absence of insults. Negotiation and Management Research, 6, 67–78. doi:10.1111/ncmr.12007
24.
HodsonG.DhontK. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
25.
JacksonJ. W.PoulsenJ. R. (2005). Contact experiences mediate the relationship between five-factor model personality traits and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 667–685. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02140.x
26.
KanasA.ScheepersP.SterkensC. (2017). Positive and negative contact and attitudes towards the religious out-group: Testing the contact hypothesis in conflict and non-conflict regions of Indonesia and the Philippines. Social Science Research, 63, 95–110. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.019
27.
LevinS.RoccasS.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2015). Personal values and intergroup outcomes of concern for group honor. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 374–384. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.047
28.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
29.
MähönenT. A.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2016). Ramifications of positive and negative contact experiences among remigrants from Russia to Finland. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22, 247–255. doi:10.1037/cdp0000059
30.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
MoonC.TravaglinoG. A.UskulA. K. (2018). Social value orientation and endorsement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: An exploratory study comparing individuals from North America and South Korea. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02262
32.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
33.
PaoliL. (2003). Mafia brotherhoods: Organized crime, Italian style. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738. doi:10.1177/0146167210388667
35.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
36.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37.
Pitt-RiversJ. (1966). Honour and social status. In PeristianyJ. (Ed.), Honour and shame: The values of Mediterranean society (pp. 19–77). London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
38.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
39.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.. . .HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136. doi:10.1177/0146167216676478
40.
RobertiF. (2008). Organized crime in Italy: The Neapolitan Camorra today. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 2, 43–49. doi:10.1093/police/pan016
41.
Rodriguez MosqueraP. M. (2016). On the importance of family, morality, masculine, and feminine honor for theory and research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 431–442. doi:10.1111/spc3.12262
42.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
43.
SchneiderJ. C.SchneiderP. T. (2003). Reversible destiny: Mafia, antimafia, and the struggle for Palermo. California: University of California Press.
44.
SelvanathanH. P.TechakesariP.TroppL. R.BarlowF. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 893–912. doi:10.1177/1368430217690908
45.
SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). Perpetuating one’s own disadvantage: Intergroup contact enables the ideological legitimation of inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1391–1403. doi:10.1177/0146167213497593
46.
ShafaS.HarinckF.EllemersN.BeersmaB. (2015). Regulating honor in the face of insults. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 158–174. doi:10.1016/j.iijntrel.2015.04.004
47.
SkaperdasS.SyropoulosC. (1995). Gangs as primitive states. In FiorentiniG.PeltzmanS. (Eds.), The economics of organised crime (pp. 61–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
StephanW. S.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49.
TauschN.SaguyT.BrysonJ. (2015). The implications of intergroup contact for social change: Its impact on individual mobility and collective action intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 536–553. doi:10.1111/josi.12127
50.
TorosH.MavelliL. (2013). Terrorism, organised crime and the biopolitics of violence. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 6, 73–91. doi:10.1080/17539153.2013.765701
51.
TravaglinoG. A.AbramsD. (2019). How criminal organisations exert secret power over communities: An intracultural appropriation theory of cultural values and norms. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 74–122. doi:10.1080/10463283.2019.1621128
52.
TravaglinoG. A.AbramsD.RandsleydeMouraG. (2014). Men of honor don’t talk: The relationship between masculine honor and social activism against criminal organizations in Italy. Political Psychology, 37, 183–199. doi:10.1111/pops.12226
53.
TravaglinoG. A.AbramsD.RandsleydeMouraG.RussoG. (2015). That is how we do it around here: Levels of identification, masculine honor, and social activism against organized crime in the south of Italy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 342–348. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2100
54.
TravaglinoG. A.AbramsD.RussoG. (2017). Dual routes from social identity to collective opposition to criminal organisations: Intracultural appropriation theory and the roles of honour codes and social change beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 317–332. doi:10.1177/1368430216682351
55.
TravaglinoG. A.DruryL. (2018). Connected guys: Endorsement of masculine honour predicts more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations. European Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2389
56.
TriandisH. C. (2001). Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.696169
57.
TroppL. R.HawiD.van LaarC.LevinS. (2012). Cross-ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 257–272. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02050.x
58.
TurnerR. N.DhontK.HewstoneM.PrestwichA.VonofakouC. (2014). The role of personality factors in the reduction of intergroup anxiety and amelioration of outgroup attitudes via intergroup contact. European Journal of Personality, 28, 180–192. doi:10.1002/per.1927
59.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
60.
UskulA. K.CrossS. E.GunsoyC.GulP. (2019). Cultures of honor. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 793–821). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61.
Van AsscheJ.RoetsA.DhontK.van HielA. (2016). The association between actual and perceived ethnic diversity: The moderating role of authoritarianism and implications for outgroup threat, anxiety, and mistrust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 807–817. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2211
62.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997–1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
63.
VezzaliL.TurnerR.CapozzaD.TrifilettiE. (2018). Does intergroup contact affect personality? A longitudinal study on the bidirectional relationship between intergroup contact and personality traits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 159–173. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2313
64.
Von LampeK. (2016). Organized crime: Analyzing illegal activities, criminal structures, and extra-legal governance. London, UK: SAGE.
65.
WeberM. (1919). Politik Aals Beruf [Politics as a vocation]. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
66.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society (RothG.WittichC., Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
67.
WölferR.JaspersE.BlaylockD.WigoderC.HughesJ.HewstoneM. (2017). Studying positive and negative direct and extended contact: Complementing self-reports with social network analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1566–1581. doi:10.1177/0146167217719732
68.
YukiM.BrewerM. B. (Eds.). (2014). Culture and group processes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
