We examined the association of the combination of direct intergroup contact and mass media news with attitudes toward immigrants and gay people in Italy, hypothesizing that direct intergroup contact would buffer the negative association between media news and attitudes, but only when contact was intimate or positive. Measuring contact variables and attitudes toward immigrants (Study 1, N = 428; Study 2, N = 426) and gay men and women (Study 3, N = 220), we found that intimate and positive direct intergroup contact was associated with more positive attitudes toward outgroup members, whereas exposure to negative news was related to more negative attitudes. Moreover, our results supported the buffering hypothesis, as the negative association between negative news and intergroup attitudes was significantly weaker amongst respondents with higher levels of intimate and positive intergroup contact.
AbersonC. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760. doi:10.1177/1368430214556699
2.
AbersonC. L.GaffneyA. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830. doi:10.1002/ejsp.582
3.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
ArmstrongG. B.NeuendorfK. A. (1992). TV entertainment, news, and racial perceptions of college students. Journal of Communication, 42, 153–176. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00804.x
6.
ÁrnadóttirK.LolliotS.BrownR.HewstoneM. (2018). Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 784–800. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2365
7.
Avila-SaavedraG. (2009). Nothing queer about queer television: Televized construction of gay masculinities. Media, Culture & Society, 31, 5–21. doi:10.1177/0163443708098243
8.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R.HarwoodJ.. . .SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
9.
BiekM.WoodW.ChaikenS. (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 547–556. doi:10.1177/0146167296226001
10.
BirtelM. D.CrispR. J. (2012). “Treating” prejudice: An exposure-therapy approach to reducing negative reactions toward stigmatized groups. Psychological Science, 23, 1379–1386. doi:10.1177/0956797612443838
11.
BondB. J. (2014). Sex and sexuality in entertainment media popular with lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Mass Communication and Society, 17, 98–120. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.816739
12.
BosettiG. L.VociA.PagottoL. (2011). Religiosity, the sinner, and the sin: Different patterns of prejudice toward homosexuals and homosexuality. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18, 157–170.
13.
CronbachL. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414–417. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.414
14.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
15.
DaviesK.WrightS. C.AronA. (2011). Intergroup friendships: How interpersonal connections encourage positive intergroup attitudes. In TroppL. R.MallettR. (Eds.), Beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 119–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
16.
DhontK.van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
17.
DixonT. L. (2008a). Crime news and racialized beliefs: Understanding the relationship between local news viewing and perceptions of African Americans and crime. Journal of Communication, 58, 106–125. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00376.x
18.
DixonT. L. (2008b). Network news and racial beliefs: Exploring the connection between national television news exposure and stereotypical perceptions of African Americans. Journal of Communication, 58, 321–337. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00387.x
19.
DixonT. L.AzocarC. L. (2007). Priming crime and activating Blackness: Understanding the psychological impact of the overrepresentation of Blacks as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 57, 229–253. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00341.x
20.
DixonT. L.LinzD. (2000). Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 131–154. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02845.x
21.
DomkeD. (2001). Racial cues and political ideology: An examination of associative priming. Communication Research, 28, 772–801. doi:10.1177/009365001028006003
22.
EntmanR.RojeckiA. (2000). The Black image in the White mind: Race and media in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
FujiokaY. (1999). Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: Examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 52–75. doi:10.1177/107769909907600105
24.
GilliamF. D.Jr.IyengarS. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560–573. doi:10.2307/2669264
25.
GilliamF. D.ValentinoN. A.BeckmannM. N. (2002). Where you live and what you watch: The impact of racial proximity and local television news on attitudes about race and crime. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 755–780. doi:10.1177/106591290205500402
26.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2018). Does intimacy counteract or amplify the detrimental effects of negative intergroup contact on attitudes?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 214–225. doi:10.1177/1368430218767026
27.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 347–364. doi:10.1177/0146167216685291
28.
HerekG. M. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 1, 6–24. doi:10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6
29.
HerekG. M.McLemoreK. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309–333. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826
30.
HewstoneM. (2009). Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, 243–300. doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197264584.003.0009
31.
HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
HuberG. A.LapinskiJ. S. (2006). The “race card” revisited: Assessing racial priming in policy contests. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 421–440. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00192.x
33.
JaccardJ.WanC. K.TurrisiR. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 467–478. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_4
34.
MaliciL. (2014). Queer TV moments and family viewing in Italy. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10, 188–210. doi:10.1080/1550428X.2014.857234
35.
MastroD.Behm-MorawitzE.OrtizM. (2007). The cultivation of social perceptions of Latinos: A mental models approach. Media Psychology, 9, 347–365. doi:10.1080/15213260701286106
36.
MastroD.LapinskiM. K.KopaczM. A.Behm-MorawitzE. (2009). The influence of exposure to depictions of race and crime in TV news on viewer’s social judgments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 615–635. doi:10.1080/08838150903310534
37.
MastroD. E.Behm-MorawitzE. (2005). Latino representation on primetime television. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 110–130. doi:10.1177/107769900508200108
38.
McLaughlinB.RodriguezN. S. (2017). Identifying with a stereotype: The divergent effects of exposure to homosexual television characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 1196–1213. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1242335
39.
MirisolaA.SetaL. (2016). pequod: Moderated Regression Package. R package (Version 0.0–5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pequod
40.
OrtizM.HarwoodJ. (2007). A social cognitive theory approach to the effects of mediated intergroup contact on intergroup attitudes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 615–631. doi:10.1080/08838150701626487
41.
PagottoL.VociA. (2013). Direct and mass mediated contact: The role of different intergroup emotions. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20, 365–381. doi:10.4473/TPM20.4.5
42.
PaluckE. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: A field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 574–587. doi:10.1037/a0011989
43.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738. doi:10.1177/0146167210388667
44.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM.HusnuS.JoyceN.HewstoneM. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 548–562. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2029
45.
PettigrewT. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002
46.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
47.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
48.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.GoldmanR. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
49.
RamasubramanianS. (2010). Television viewing, racial attitudes, and policy preferences: Exploring the role of social identity and intergroup emotions in influencing support for affirmative action. Communication Monographs, 77, 102–120. doi:10.1080/03637750903514300
50.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
51.
SchemerC. (2012). The influence of news media on stereotypic attitudes toward immigrants in a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 62, 739–757. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01672.x
SotirovicM. (2001). Media use and perceptions of welfare. Journal of Communication, 51, 750–774. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02905.x
54.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.. . . RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254. doi:10.1177/01461672022812009
55.
StephanW. G.YbarraO.Rios MorrisonK. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–59). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
56.
TechakesariP.BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.SungB.ThaiM.ChakJ. L. (2015). An investigation of positive and negative contact as predictors of intergroup attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 454–468. doi:10.1177/0022022115570313
57.
Ten BergeJ. B.LanceeB.JaspersE. (2017). Can interethnic friends buffer for the prejudice increasing effect of negative interethnic contact? A longitudinal study of adolescents in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 33, 423–435. doi:10.1093/esr/jcx045
58.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.369
59.
ValenzuelaS. (2009). Variations in media priming: The moderating role of knowledge, interest, news attention, and discussion. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 756–774. doi:10.1177/107769900908600403
60.
Van DickR.WagnerU.PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WolfC.PetzelT.. . . JacksonJ. S. (2004). Role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211–227. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.211
61.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
62.
VonofakouC.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Contact with out-group friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804–820. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.804
63.
WoodW.KallgrenC. A.PreislerR. M. (1985). Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 73–85. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90007-1
64.
WrightS. C.BrodyS. M.AronA. (2005). Intergroup contact: Still our best hope for improving intergroup relations. In CrandallC. S.SchallerM. (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 119–146). Lawrence, KS: Lewinian Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
