Past research is limited by a focus on intimacy in positive intergroup contact. This study tested whether intergroup intimacy counteracts or amplifies the detrimental effects of negative intergroup contact on outgroup attitudes. Participants from five Central European countries (N = 1,276) described their intergroup contact with, and attitudes towards, citizens from neighboring nations. We coded the contact descriptions for presence (vs. absence) of intimacy (intimate, casual, or formal relationships) and contact valence (negative, positive, or ambivalent). The results indicated that those who reported negative contact in the context of intimate relationships displayed more positive outgroup attitudes than those who reported negative contact in the context of nonintimate relationships. This protective function of intimacy extended to instances of ambivalent contact. Our findings speak of the additive value of intimacy and positivity for intergroup relations; they underscore the benefits of intimacy as part of not only positive but also negative intergroup contact.
AbersonC. L.GaffneyA. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830. doi:10.1002/ejsp.582
2.
ÁrnadóttirK.LolliotS.BrownR.HewstoneM. (2018). Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 784–800. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2365
3.
BanerjeeM.CapozzoliM.McSweeneyL.SinhaD. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 3–23. doi:10.2307/3315487
4.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R. M.HarwoodJ.. . .SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643. doi:10.1177/0146167212457953
5.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
6.
DhontK.van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
7.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E. (1992). Should I stay or should I go? A dependence model of breakups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 62–87. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.62
8.
GrafS.PaoliniS. (2017). Investigating positive and negative intergroup contact: Rectifying a long-standing positivity bias in the literature. In VezzaliL.StathiS. (Eds.), Intergroup contact theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 92–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2052
10.
GurungR. A. R.DuongT. (1999). Mixing and matching: Assessing the concomitants of mixed-ethnic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 639–657. doi:10.1177/0265407599165005
11.
HaddockG.ZannaM. P.EssesV. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1105
12.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 347–364. doi:10.1177/0146167216685291
13.
HerekG. M.CapitanioJ. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424. doi:10.1177/0146167296224007
14.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HambergerJ.NiensU. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00441.x
15.
JonesW.BurdetteM. P. (1994). Betrayal in relationships. In WeberA.HarveyJ. (Eds.), Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 243–262). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001013
17.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Wade BrownS.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
18.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149–168. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00108.x
19.
NeuendorfK. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
Page-GouldE. (2012). To whom can I turn? Maintenance of positive intergroup relations in the face of intergroup conflict. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 462–470. doi:10.1177/1948550611426937
21.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM.HusnuS.JoyceN.HewstoneM. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 548–562. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2029
22.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786. doi:10.1177/0146167203262848
23.
PatersonJ. L.TurnerR. N.ConnerM. T. (2015). Extended contact through cross-group romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 489–497. doi:10.1111/jasp.12314
24.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185. doi:10.1177/0146167297232006
25.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
26.
PettigrewT. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187–199. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.12.002
27.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytical test of the intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
28.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
29.
PowersD. A.EllisonC. G. (1995). Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205–226. doi:10.1093/sf/74.1.205
30.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.. . . HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136. doi:10.1177/0146167216676478
31.
RempelJ. K.HolmesJ. G.ZannaM. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
32.
SalomonG. (2006). Does peace education really make a difference?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12, 37–48. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac1201_3
33.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2010). The impact of cross-group friendships in South Africa: Affective mediators and multi-group comparisons. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 309–333. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01647.x
34.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
35.
TurnerR. N.FeddesA. R. (2011). How intergroup friendship works: A longitudinal study of friendship effects on outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 914–923. doi:10.1002/ejsp.843
36.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 212–255. doi:10.1080/10463280701680297
37.
VonofakouC.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Contact with out-group friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804–820. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.312
