How do members of societally valued (dominant) groups respond when considering inequality? Prior research suggests that salient inequality may be viewed as a threat to dominant-group members’ self and collective moral character. However, people possess multiple social identities and may be advantaged in one domain (e.g., White) while concurrently disadvantaged in another domain (e.g., sexual minority). The present research tests whether individuals may reduce the moral-image threat of being societally advantaged in one domain by highlighting discrimination they face in other domains. Four experiments with individuals advantaged along different dimensions of inequality (race, social class, sexuality) reveal that making such inequality salient evokes greater perceived discrimination faced by oneself and one’s ingroups along other identity dimensions.
BergsiekerH. B.SheltonJ. N.RichesonJ. A. (2010). To be liked versus respected: Divergent goals in interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 248-264.
2.
BranscombeN. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
3.
ChowR. M.GalakJ. (2012). The effect of inequality frames on support for redistributive tax policies. Psychological Science, 23, 1467-1469.
4.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170-180.
5.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 759-777.
6.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Discrimination divides across identity dimensions: Perceived racism reduces support for gay rights and increases anti-gay bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 169-174.
7.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the Psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 21-27.
8.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (2007). Multiple social categorization. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163-254). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
9.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81-100.
10.
CurtinN.KendeA.KendeJ. (2016). Navigating multiple identities: The simultaneous influence of advantaged and disadvantaged identities on politicization and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 264-285.
11.
CurtinN.StewartA. J.ColeE. R. (2015). Challenging the status quo: The role of intersectional awareness in activism for social change and pro-social intergroup attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 512-529.
12.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
13.
GaitherS. E. (2018). The multiplicity of belonging: Pushing identity research beyond binary thinking. Self and Identity, 17, 443-454.
14.
GoffP. A.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G. (2008). The space between us: Stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91-107.
15.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2011). To escape blame, don’t be a hero—Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 516-519.
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
17.
HoloienD. S. (2016). Whites’ desire to affiliate and perceived understanding in interracial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 7-16.
18.
HopkinsN.ReicherS.HarrisonK.CassidyC.BullR.LevineM. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behaviour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 776-788.
19.
IyerA.LeachC. W. (2008). Emotion in inter-group relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86-125.
20.
IyerA.LeachC. W.CrosbyF. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
21.
IyerA.SchmaderT.LickelB. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587.
22.
KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547-574.
23.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.UnzuetaM. M. (2014). Deny, distance, or dismantle? How white Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 594-609.
24.
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersenA. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232-1245.
25.
LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.CrosbyJ. R. (2009). Taking from those that have more and giving to those that have less: How inequity frames affect corrections for inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 375-378.
26.
LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.KnowlesE. D.UnzuetaM. M. (2012). Paying for positive group esteem: How inequity frames affect whites’ responses to redistributive policies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 323-336.
27.
LoweryB. S.KnowlesE. D.UnzuetaM. M. (2007). Framing inequity safely: Whites’ motivated perceptions of racial privilege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1237-1250.
28.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068-1086.
29.
MironA. M.BranscombeN. R.BiernatM. (2010). Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 768-779.
30.
MironA. M.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup inequality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 163-180.
31.
MussweilerT.GabrielS.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Shifting social identities as a strategy for deflecting threatening social comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 398-409.
32.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215-218.
PhillipsL. T.LoweryB. S. (2015). The hard-knock life? Whites claim hardships in response to racial inequity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 12-18.
35.
PittinskyT. L.ShihM.AmbadyN. (1999). Identity adaptiveness: Affect across multiple identities. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 503-518.
36.
PowellA. A.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2005). Inequality as in group privilege or out group disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508-521.
37.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391.
38.
RemediosJ. D.SnyderS. H. (2015). How women of color detect and respond to multiple forms of prejudice. Sex Roles, 73, 371-383.
39.
RoccasS. (2003). The effects of status on identification with multiple groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 351-366.
40.
RosetteA. S.TostL. P. (2013). Perceiving social inequity: When subordinate-group positioning on one dimension of social hierarchy enhances privilege recognition on another. Psychological Science, 24, 1420-1427.
41.
SellersR. M.SmithM. A.SheltonJ. N.RowleyS. A. J.ChavousT. M. (1998). Multidimensional model of racial identity: A reconceptualization of African American racial identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 18-39.
42.
SeskoA. K.BiernatM. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356-360.
43.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 477-483.
44.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.UllrichJ.DovidioJ. F.CarmiD. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030.
45.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.BranscombeN. R.RothschildZ. K. (2012). Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 778-795.
46.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In HoggM. A.AbramsD. (Eds.), Key readings in social psychology: Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 94-109). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
47.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 310-333.
van LeeuwenE. (2007). Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 661-671.
50.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
51.
VignolesV. L.RegaliaC.ManziC.GolledgeJ.ScabiniE. (2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 308-333.
52.
VollhardtJ. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls: Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 89-120.
53.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants: Inclusive victim consciousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 354-368.
54.
ZitekE. M.JordanA. H.MoninB.LeachF. R. (2010). Victim entitlement to behave selfishly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 245-225.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
