A central theoretical assumption in the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) map framework is that emotions mediate the relationships between stereotypes and intergroup behavior. Despite the BIAS map’s popularity, very few studies have tested the model’s mediation hypotheses and none have tested them by replicating the original study (Cuddy, Fiske, & Glick, 2007, Study 1). We provide a replication in a Norwegian sample (N = 244). The results supported that stereotype content is related to behavior tendencies, mediated through emotional prejudices. However, for each of the four behavior outcomes the effect of stereotype content was mediated through one emotion rather than two as predicted by the BIAS map. Our findings both converge and diverge from those of Cuddy and colleagues, and provide support for theoretical propositions unsupported by the original study. Overall, the study provides empirical support for the BIAS map framework and its cross-cultural validity.
BeckerJ. C.AsbrockF. (2012). What triggers helping versus harming of ambivalent groups? Effects of the relative salience of warmth versus competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.015
2.
ByeH. H.HerrebrødenH.HjetlandG. J.RøysetG. Ø.WestbyL. L. (2014). Stereotypes of Norwegian social groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 469–476. doi:10.1111/sjop.12141
3.
CaprarielloP. A.CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155. doi:10.1177/1368430208101053
4.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.92.4.631
5.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
6.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.KwanV. S. Y.GlickP.DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.. . .ZieglerR. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. doi:10.1348/014466608x314935
7.
DuranteF.FiskeS. T.KervynN.CuddyA. J. C.AkandeA.AdetounB. E.. . .StorariC. C. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 726–746. doi:10.1111/bjso.12005
8.
FischerA. H.RosemanI. J. (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.1.103
9.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
10.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.82.6.878
11.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.57.2.212
12.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
13.
KoschateM.HofmannW.SchmittM. (2012). When East meets West: A longitudinal examination of the relationship between group relative deprivation and intergroup contact in reunified Germany. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 290–311. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02056.x
14.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602
15.
MatthewsM.LevinS. (2012). Testing a dual process model of prejudice: Assessment of group threat perceptions and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 564–574. doi:10.1007/s11031–012–9280-y
16.
ParrottW. G. (1991). The emotional experiences of envy and jealousy. In SaloveyP. (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
17.
SadlerM. S.KayeK. E.VaughnA. A. (2015). Competence and warmth stereotypes prompt mental illness stigma through emotions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 602–612. doi:10.1111/jasp.12323
18.
SmithE. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Towards new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
SmithR. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In SulsJ.WheelerL. (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173–200). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
20.
StanleyD. J.SpenceJ. R. (2014). Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 305–318. doi:10.1177/1745691614528518
21.
SweetmanJ.SpearsR.LivingstoneA. G.MansteadA. S. R. (2013). Admiration regulates social hierarchy: Antecedents, dispositions, and effects on intergroup behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 534–542. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.007
22.
TalaskaC. A.FiskeS. T.ChaikenS. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263–296. doi:10.1007/s11211–008–0071–2
23.
UfkesE. G.OttenS.van der ZeeK. I.GiebelsE.DovidioJ. F. (2012). The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in “day-to-day” conflicts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 57–74. doi:10.1177/1368430211417832
24.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.92.4.548
