Starting from the pluralistic view of morality proposed by the moral foundations theory, this paper aims at highlighting the plurality of personal moral concerns that may drive people to collective action and at investigating how they are connected with other personal and group-based motivations to act (i.e., moral obligation, moral convictions, politicized group identity, group efficacy, and group-based anger). Moral foundations can be distinguished into individualizing foundations, aimed at protecting individual rights and well-being; and binding foundations, aimed at tightening people into ordered communities. We expected that collective action intention would be most strongly associated with an individualizing foundation in equality-focused movements, and with a binding foundation in conformity-focused ones. Four studies that examined activists of both liberal and conservative movements confirmed these expectations. The relevant foundations predicted collective action mainly through the mediation of moral obligation and politicized identity, but they also had some effects above and beyond them.
AlbericiA. I.MilesiP. (2013). The influence of the Internet on the psychosocial predictors of collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 373–388. doi:10.1002/casp.2131
2.
AlbericiA. I.MilesiP. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 43–59. doi:10.1177/1368430215581430
3.
BarthM.JugertP.WutzlerM.FritscheI. (2015). Absolute moral standards and global identity as independent predictors of collective action against global injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 918–931. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2160
4.
BertolottiM.CatellaniP. (2014). Effects of message framing in policy communication on climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 474–486. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2033
5.
CliffordS.WendellD. G. (2016). How disgust influences health purity attitudes. Political Behavior, 38, 155–178. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9310-z
6.
CourvilleT.ThompsonB. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: β is not enough. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 229–248. doi:10.1177/00131640121971211
7.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T.DowningE. L.TrailT. E. (2014). Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1559–1573. doi:10.1177/0146167214551152
8.
FattoriF.PozziM.MarzanaD.MannariniT. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behaviour and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 906–917. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2154
9.
FedericoC. M.WeberC. R.ErgunD.HuntC. (2013). Mapping the connections between politics and morality: The multiple socio-political orientations involved in moral intuition. Political Psychology, 34, 589–610. doi:10.1111/pops.12006
10.
FranksA. S.ScherrK. C. (2015). Using moral foundations to predict voting behavior: Regression models from the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15, 213–232. doi:10.1111/asap.12074
11.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
13.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
14.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
15.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
HornseyM.BlackwoodL.LouisW.FieldingK.MavorK.MortonT.. . .WhiteK. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1701–1722. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x
18.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological roots of an individualist ideology. PLoS ONE, 7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
19.
JasperJ. M. (2014). Constructing indignation: Anger dynamics in protest movements. Emotion Review, 14, 208–213. doi:10.1177/1754073914522863
20.
KellyC.BreinlingerS. (1996). Identity and injustice: Exploring women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 41–57. doi:10.1002/casp.2450050104
21.
KesebirP.PyszczynskiT. (2011). A moral-existential account of the psychological factors fostering intergroup conflict. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 878–890. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00397.x
22.
KolevaS. P.GrahamJ.IyerR.DittoD. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
23.
KraftR. N. (2015). The good intentions of violent perpetrators: A qualitative analysis of testimony from South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 359–377. doi:10.1037/pac0000079
24.
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersenA. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245. doi:10.1177/0146167206289729
25.
LewisG. J.BrownG. (2015). Moral sentiment predicts desire for Scottish independence. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 254–258. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.041
26.
MazzoniD.AlbericiA. I. (2016). Why do patients protest? Collective action processes in people with chronic illnesses: A psychosocial perspective. In GraffignaG. (Ed.), Promoting patient engagement and participation for effective healthcare reform (pp. 128–150). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
27.
MazzoniD.CigognaniE. (2013). Water as a commons: An exploratory study on the motives for collective action among Italian Water Movement activists. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 314–330. doi:10.1002/casp.2123
28.
MazzoniD.van ZomerenM.CicognaniE. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian Water Movement. Political Psychology, 36, 315–330. doi:10.1111/pops.12101
29.
MercierH.SperberD. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10002281
30.
MilesiP. (2016). Moral foundations and political attitudes: The moderating role of political sophistication. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 252–260. doi:10.1002/ijop.12158
31.
PileckiA. (in press). The moral dimensions of the terrorist category construction in presidential rhetoric and their use in legitimizing counterterrorism policy. Qualitative Psychology. doi:10.1037/qup0000037
32.
RossenI. L.DunlopP. D.LawrenceC. M. (2015). The desire to mantain the social order and the right to economic freedom: Two distinct moral pathways to climate change scepticism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 42–47. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.006
33.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity. A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319–331. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
34.
SkitkaL. J. (2012). Moral convictions and moral courage: Common denominators of good and evil. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality. Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 349–365). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
SkitkaL. J.MorganG. S. (2014). The social and political implications of moral conviction. Advances in Political Psychology, 35, 95–110. doi:10.1111/pops.12166
36.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE. (2002). The dark side of moral conviction. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 35–41. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00024.x
37.
StürmerS.SimonB. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263–277. doi:10.1177/0146167203256690
38.
ThomasE. F.MavorK. I.McGartyC. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 75–88. doi:10.1177/1368430211413619
39.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 115–134. doi:10.1348/014466608X313774
40.
Turner-ZwinkelsF.van ZomerenM.PostmesT. (2015). Politicization during the 2012 U.S. presidential elections: Bridging the personal and the political through an identity content approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 433–445. doi:10.1177/0146167215569494
41.
Van StekelenburgJ.KlandermansB.van DijkW. W. (2009). Context matters: Explaining how and why mobilizing context influences motivational dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 815–838. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01626.x
42.
Van ZomerenM. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7–6, 378–388. doi:10.1111/spc3.12031
43.
Van ZomerenM. (2014). Synthesizing individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on environmental and collective action through a relational perspective. Theory & Psychology, 24, 775–794. doi:10.1177/0959354314548617
44.
Van ZomerenM. (2015). Collective action as relational interaction: A new relational hypothesis on how non-activists become activists. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.04.00
45.
Van ZomerenM. (2016). Building a tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Advances in Political Psychology, 37, 87–114. doi:10.1111/pops.12322
46.
Van ZomerenMPostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
47.
Van ZomerenMPostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 52–71. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x
48.
Van ZomerenMPostmesT.SpearsRBettacheK. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantage to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 735–753. doi:10.1177/1368430210395637
49.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsA. (2009). Metaphors of protest: A classification of motivations for collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 661–680. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01619.x
50.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is!: Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
51.
VilasX.SabucedoJ. M. (2012). Moral obligation: A forgotten dimension in the analysis of collective action. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 369–375. doi:10.1174/021347412802845577
52.
WestenD. (2007). The political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
53.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994
54.
ZaalM. P.SaabR.O’BrienK.JeffriesC.BarretoM.van LaarC. (2015). You’re either with us or against us! Moral conviction determines how the politicized distinguish friend from foe. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 1–21. doi:10.1177/1368430215615682
