We present evidence for a complex relationship between religiousness and Haidt’s moral foundations, with data from four experiments, measuring 21 different dimensions of personal religiousness and utilizing six different religious primes. The more conservative dimensions of religiousness, such as intrinsic religious orientation and religious attendance, were positively related to binding moral foundations of loyalty, authority, and purity and sometimes related to the individualizing foundation of care. However, other, less conservative dimensions of religiousness, such as quest and extrinsic religious orientations, were unrelated or negatively related to binding foundations. Benevolent God concept was the only religious measure that was positively related to all five moral foundations. We did not find reliable effects of religious primes on endorsement of moral foundations. Results suggest a consistent but complicated relationship between religiousness and moral foundations at a dispositional level.
AllportG. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 448–451.
2.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
3.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
4.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (2004). A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The short and sweet of it. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 47–54.
5.
AronsonE.EllsworthP. C.CarlsmithJ. M.GonzalesM. H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
6.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). Cambridge University Press.
7.
BassettJ. F.Van TongerenD. R.GreenJ. D.SonntagM. E.KilpatrickH. (2015). The interactive effects of mortality salience and political orientation on moral judgments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 306–323.
8.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP. A. (1991). Measuring religion as quest: 2) reliability concerns. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30, 430–447.
9.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP. A.VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual. Oxford University Press.
10.
BellC. A.SandageS. J.MorganT. D.HaugeD. J. (2017). Relational spirituality, humility, and commitments to social justice and intercultural competence. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 36, 210–221.
11.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
12.
BlogowskaJ.LambertC.SaroglouV. (2013). Religious prosociality and aggression: It’s real. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12048
13.
BrewerB.FischerL.WrightD.DoriusG.CluffR. (2008). Relationships among literacy, church activity and intrinsic/extrinsic religiosity in a Utah sample of latter-day saints. Issues in Religion and Psychotherapy, 32, 52–59.
14.
BurnhamM. J.LeY. K.PiedmontR. L. (2018). Who is MTurk? Personal characteristics and sample consistency of these online workers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 21, 934–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1486394
CarlN.CofnasN.WoodleyO. M. (2016). Scientific literacy, optimism about science and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.046
ChanK. Q.TongE. M. W.TanY. L. (2014). Taking a leap of faith: Reminders of God lead to greater risk taking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 901–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614537309
19.
CornwellJ. F. M.HigginsE. T. (2013). Morality and its relation to political ideology: The role of promotion and prevention concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(9), 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213489036
20.
CurryO. S.MullinsD. A.WhitehouseH. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60, 47–59.
21.
DavisD. E.DooleyM. T.HookJ. N.ChoeE.McElroyS. E. (2017). The Purity/Sanctity subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire does not work similarly for religious versus non-religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9, 124–130.
22.
DawkinsR. (2006). The God delusion. Random House.
23.
de RegtS. (2012). Religiosity as a moderator of the relationship between authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2012.635045
24.
Di BattistaS.PivettiM.BertiC. (2018). Moral foundations, political orientation and religiosity in Italy. The Open Psychology Journal, 11, 46–58.
25.
DonahueM. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400–419.
26.
DuriezB. (2003). Religiosity, moral attitudes and moral competence: A research note on the relation between religiosity and morality. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 25, 210–221.
27.
DuriezB.DezutterJ.NeyrinckB.HutsebautD. (2007). An introduction to the Post-critical Belief Scale: Internal structure and external relationships. Psyke & Logos, 28, 767–793.
28.
DuriezB.HutsebautD. (2000). The relation between religion and racism: The role of post-critical beliefs. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 3(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670050002135
29.
DuriezB.LuytenP.SnauwaertB.HutsebautD. (2002). The importance of religiosity and values in predicting political attitudes: Evidence for the continuing importance of religiosity in Flanders (Belgium). Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 5, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670110066831
30.
DuriezB.SoenensB. (2006). Religiosity, moral attitudes and moral competence: A critical investigation of the religiosity-morality relation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 76–83.
31.
DuriezB.SoenensB.HutsebautD. (2005). Introducing the shortened Post-Critical Belief Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.009
FalbM. D.PargamentK. I. (2014). Religion, spirituality, and positive psychology: Strengthening well-being. In Teramoto PedrottiJ.EdwardsL. M. (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism and positive psychology (pp. 143–157). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8654-6_10
34.
FlereS.KlanjšekR. (2009). Cross-cultural insight into the association between religiousness and authoritarianism. Archiv für Religionspsychologie/Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 31, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361209X424448
35.
FontaineJ. R. J.DuriezB.LuytenP.CorveleynJ.HutsebautD. (2005). Consequences of a multidimensional approach to religion for the relationship between religiosity and value priorities. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1502_2
36.
FontaineJ. R. J.DuriezB.LuytenP.HutsebautD. (2003). The internal structure of the post-critical belief scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00213-1
37.
FosterR. A.BabcockR. L. (2001). God as a man versus God as a woman: Perceiving God as a function of the gender of God and the gender of the participant. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 11, 93–104.
38.
FosterR. A.KeatingJ. P. (1992). Measuring androcentrism in the Western God-concept. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31, 366–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387128
39.
FroeseP.BaderC. (2010). America’s four Gods: What we say about God—and what that says about us. Oxford University Press.
40.
FultonA. S.MaynardE. A.GorsuchR. L. (1999). Religious orientation, antihomosexual sentiment, and fundamentalism among Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387580
GlockC. Y.StarkR. (1966). Christian beliefs and anti-semitism. Harper & Row.
43.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353415
44.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS. P.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
45.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
46.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
47.
GribbinsT.VandenbergB. (2011). Religious fundamentalism, the need for cognitive closure, and helping. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 106–114.
48.
HaggardM. C.KaelenR.SaroglouV.KleinO.RowattW. C. (2019). Religion’s role in the illusion of gender equality: Supraliminal and subliminal religious priming increases benevolent sexism. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11, 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000196
49.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.
50.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon/Random House.
51.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.
52.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ.JosephC. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573
53.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126–129.
54.
HarnishR. J.BridgesK. R.GumpJ. T. (2018). Predicting economic, social, and foreign policy conservatism: The role of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, moral foundations orientation, and religious fundamentalism. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 37, 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9552-x
55.
HathcoatJ.BarnesL. B. (2010). Explaining the relationship among fundamentalism and authoritarianism: An epistemic connection. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508611003607884
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP.HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLOS ONE, 8, Article e42366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
58.
JamesW. (1990). The varieties of religious experience. Vintage Books. (Original work published 1902)
59.
Janoff-BulmanR.CarnesN. C. (2018). The model of moral motives: A map of the moral domain. In GrayK.GrahamJ. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 223–230). The Guilford Press.
60.
JohnsonK. A.HookJ. N.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.SandageS. J.CrabtreeS. A. (2016). Moral foundation priorities reflect U.S. Christians’ individual differences in religiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.037
61.
JohnsonK. A.LiY. J.CohenA. B.OkunM. A. (2013). Friends in high places: The influence of authoritarian and benevolent god-concepts on social attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030138
62.
JohnsonK. A.LiuR. L.MintonE. A.BartholomewD. E.PetersonM.CohenA. B.KeesJ. (2017). US citizens’ representations of God and support for sustainability policies. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 36, 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.16.108
63.
JohnsonK. A.MemonR.AlladinA.CohenA. B.OkunM. A. (2015). Who helps the Samaritan? The influence of religious vs secular primes on spontaneous helping of members of religious outgroups. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15, 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342147
64.
JohnsonK. A.OkunM. A.CohenA. B. (2015). The mind of the Lord: Measuring authoritarian and benevolent God representations. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000011
65.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119–126.
66.
KoenigH. G. (1998). Religious attitudes and practices of hospitalized medically ill older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 213–224.
67.
KolevaS. P.GrahamJ.IyerR.DittoP. H.HaidtJ. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
68.
KrullD. S. (2016). Religiosity and moral foundations: Differing views about the basis of right and wrong. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 35, 41–51.
69.
LaBouffJ. P.HumphreysM.ShenM. J. (2017). Religiosity and group-binding moral concerns. Archiv für Religionspsychologie/Archive for the Psychology of Religions, 39, 263–282.
LavričM.FlereS. (2010). Trait anxiety and measures of religiosity in four cultural settings. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670701414961
72.
LavričM.FlereS. (2011). Intrinsic religious orientation and religious rewards: An empirical evaluation of two approaches to religious motivation. Rationality and Society, 23, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463111404670
73.
LewisA. R.MockabeeS. T.DjupeP. A.WuJ. S. (2015). The (non) religion of Mechanical Turk workers. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 54, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12184
74.
MaltbyJ.LewisC. A.DayL. (1999). Religious orientation and psychological well-being: The role of the frequency of personal prayer. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910799168704
75.
McKayR.WhitehouseH. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 447–473.
76.
MonroeA. E.PlantE. A. (2019). The dark side of morality: Prioritizing sanctity over care motivates denial of mind and prejudice toward sexual outgroups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(2), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000537
77.
MooijmanM.MeindlP.OysermanD.MonterossoJ.DehghaniM.DorisJ. M.GrahamJ. (2018). Resisting temptation for the good of the group: Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 585–599.
78.
NapierJ. L.LuguriJ. B. (2013). Moral mind-sets: Abstract thinking increases a preference for “individualizing” over “binding” moral foundations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 754–759.
79.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.
80.
PargamentK. I.SmithB. W.KoenigH. G.PerezL. (1998). Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 710–724.
81.
PearteC.RenkK.NegyC. (2013). Explaining variation in relations among intrinsic religiosity, political conservatism, and homonegativity as a function of authoritarianism’s three components: An expansion on recent literature. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0114-9
82.
PiazzaJ.LandyJ. F. (2013). “Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 639–661.
83.
PiazzaJ.SousaP.RottmanJ.SyropoulosS. (2019). Which appraisals are foundational to moral judgment? Harm, injustice, and beyond. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 903–913.
84.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1471–1483.
85.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S.HernandezJ. I. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 574–590.
86.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867
87.
Randolph-SengB.NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610701572812
88.
ReinertD. F.BloomingdaleJ. R. (2000). Spiritual experience, religious orientation and self-reported behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327582IJPR1003_03
89.
RitterR. S.PrestonJ. L. (2013). Representations of religious words: Insights for religious priming research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 494–507.
90.
RossinowD. (2015). Prophecy and progress: Christianity and dissent in modern America. Journal of Historical Sociology, 28, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12068
91.
RowattW. C.FranklinL. M.CottonM. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 29–43.
92.
SaucierG.KennerJ.IurinoK.MalhamP. B.ChenZ.ThalmayerA. G.. . .AltschulC. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in a global “survey of world views.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114551791
93.
ScheinC.GrayK. (2018). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 32–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317698288
94.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
95.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT.NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.
96.
SimpsonD. B.NewmanJ. L.FuquaD. R. (2010). Further evidence regarding the validity of the quest orientation. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 29, 334–342.
97.
SmitherJ. W.WalkerA. G. (2015). The relationship between core self-evaluations, views of God, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. Psychological Reports, 116, 647–662.
98.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezA.SeyleC. D.MoralesJ. F.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668
99.
SwannW. B.Jr.JettenJ.GómezA.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441–456.
100.
ThomsonR. A. J.FroeseP. (2016). God versus party: Competing effects on attitudes concerning criminal punishment, national security, and military service. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55, 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12293
101.
TsangJ.CarlisleR. D.McCulloughM. E. (2019). Measuring religious constructs: A hierarchical approach to construct organization and scale selection. In GallagherM. W.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (2nd ed., pp. 349–360). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000138-022
102.
van ElkM.MatzkeD.GronauQ.GuangM.VandekerckhoveJ.WagenmakersE. J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1365.
103.
YalçındağB.ÖzkanT.CesurS.YilmazO.TepeB.PiyaleZ. E.. . .SunarD. (2019). An investigation of moral foundations theory in turkey using different measures. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 38, 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4
104.
YeldermanL. A.MillerM. K. (2017). Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: Effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23, 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1239097
105.
YilmazO.HarmaM.BahçekapiliH. G.CesurS. (2016). Validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090
106.
YilmazO.SaribayS. A. (2017). Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations. Cognition, 165, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.009
107.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I.ColeB.RyeM. S.ButterE. M.BelavichT. G.. . .KadarJ. L. (1997). Religion and spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 549–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387689
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
