Norm violations engender both negative reactions and perceptions of power from observers. We addressed this paradox by examining whether observers’ tendency to grant power to norm followers versus norm violators is moderated by the observer’s position in the hierarchy. Because norm violations threaten the status quo, we hypothesized that individuals higher in a hierarchy (high verticality) would be less likely to grant power to norm violators compared to individuals lower in the hierarchy (low verticality). In 14 studies (Ntotal = 1,704), we measured participants’ trait verticality (sense of power, socioeconomic status, testosterone) and manipulated state verticality (power position, status, dominance). A meta-analysis revealed that higher ranked participants granted less power to norm violators than lower ranked individuals, presumably because the former support social stratification. Interestingly, these effects occurred for trait but not state verticality. Overall, negative reactions to deviants may be driven by hierarchy-maintenance motives by those in privileged positions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonC.BerdahlJ. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.83.6.1362
3.
AndersonC.HildrethJ. A. D.HowlandL. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 574–601. doi:10.1037/a0038781
4.
AndersonC.JohnO. P.KeltnerD. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80, 313–344. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00734.x
5.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 295–298. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01655.x
6.
AndersonC.WillerR.KilduffG.BrownC. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1077–1088. doi:10.1037/a0027409
7.
BarkowJ. H. (1975). Prestige and culture: A biosocial interpretation. Current Anthropology, 16, 553–572. doi:10.1086/201619
8.
BarneaM. F.SchwartzS. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17–40. doi:10.1111/0162–895x.00090
9.
BellezzaS.GinoF.KeinanA. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 35–54. doi:10.1086/674870
10.
BladerS. L.ChenY. (2011). What influences how higher status people respond to lower status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status. Organization Science, 22, 1040–1060. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0558
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
BrauerM.ChekrounP. (2005). The relationship between perceived violation of social norms and social control: Situational factors influencing the reaction to deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1519–1539. doi.10.1111/j.1559–1816.2005.tb02182.x
13.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26, 15–26. doi:10.1177/0956797614553947
14.
CarneyD. R.HallJ.Smith LeBeauL. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123. doi:10.1007/s10919–005–2743-z
15.
ChekrounP.BrauerM. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867. doi:10.1002/ejsp.126
16.
ChenS.Lee-ChaiA. Y.BarghJ. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173–187. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.80.2.173
17.
ChenY. R.BrocknerJ.GreenbergJ. (2003). When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0749–5978(03)00062–1
18.
ChenY. R.PetersonR. S.PhillipsD. J.PodolnyJ. M.RidgewayC. L. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Bringing status to the table—attaining, maintaining, and experiencing status in organizations and markets. Organization Science, 23, 299–307. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0668
19.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
20.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
21.
CohrsJ. C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434. doi:10.1177/0146167205275614
DuboisD.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 436–449. doi:10.1037/pspi0000008
24.
EllysonS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In EllysonS. L.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Springer.
25.
FeldmanD. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53. doi:10.2307/258231
26.
FrenchJ. R. P.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
27.
FriesenJ. P.KayA. C.EibachR. P.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Seeking structure in social organization: Compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 590–609. doi:10.1037/a0035620
28.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.85.3.453
29.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . .YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104. doi:10.1126/science.1197754
30.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/a0022403
31.
HallJ. A.CoatsE. J.Smith LeBeauL. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.131.6.898
32.
HallJ. A.Schmid MastM.LatuI. (2014). The vertical dimension of social relations and accurate interpersonal perception: A meta-analysis. Journal of Non-Verbal Behaviour, 39, 131–163. doi:10.1007/s10919–014–0205–1
33.
Helweg-LarsenM.LoMonacoB. L. (2008). Queuing among U2 fans: Reactions to social norm violations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2378–2393. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2008.00396.x
34.
HinkinT. R.SchriesheimC. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561–567. doi:10.1037//0021–9010.74.4.561
35.
HoggM. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255. doi:10.1080/14792772043000040
36.
HoggM. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1
37.
JettenJ.HornseyM. J.SpearsR.HaslamS. A.CowellE. (2010). Rule transgressions in groups: The conditional nature of newcomers’ willingness to confront deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 338–348. doi:10.1002/ejsp.627
38.
KamC. C.-S.BondM. H. (2009). Emotional reactions of anger and shame to the norm violation characterizing episodes of interpersonal harm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 203–219. doi:10.1348/014466608x324367
39.
KieslerC. A.KieslerS. B. (1970). Conformity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter?Academy of Management Executive, 5, 48–60. doi:10.5465/ame.1991.4274679
41.
KrausM. W.KeltnerD. (2013). Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 247–261. doi:10.1037/a0032895
42.
LammersJ.StapelD.GalinskyA. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 737–744. doi:10.1177/0956797610368810
43.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1298493
44.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.ButzD. A.PerucheB. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 451–462. doi.10.1177/0146167206297405
45.
ManningJ. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46.
ManningJ. T.FinkB. (2008). Digit ratio (2D:4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet study. American Journal of Human Biology, 20, 451–461. doi:10.1002/ajhb.20767
47.
McIntyreM. H.BarrettE. S.McDermottR.JohnsonD. D. P.CowdenJ.RosenS. P. (2007). Finger length ratio (2D:4D) and sex differences in aggression during a simulated war game. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 755–764. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.009
48.
MilletK. (2011). An interactionist perspective on the relation between 2D:4D and behavior: An overview of (moderated) relationships between 2D:4D and economic decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 397–401. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.005
49.
MitchellM.SidaniusJ. (1995). Social hierarchy and executions in the United States: A social dominance perspective. The death penalty: A social dominance perspective. Political Psychology, 16, 591–619. doi:10.2307/3792228
50.
NoelJ. G.WannD. L.BranscombeN. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.68.1.127
51.
OhbuchiK. O.TamuraT.QuigleyB. M.TedeschiJ. T.MadiN.BondM. H.MummendeyA. (2004). Anger, blame, and dimensions of perceived norm violations: Culture, gender, and relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1587–1603. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2004.tb02788.x
52.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class in prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784. doi:10.1037/a0020092
53.
PiffP. K.StancatoD. M.CôtéS.Mendoza-DentonR.KeltnerD. (2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 4086–4091. doi:10.1073/pnas.1118373109
54.
PlatowM. J.van KnippenbergD. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508–1519. doi:10.1177/01461672012711011
55.
PopaM.PhillipsB. J.RobertsonC. (2014). Positive outcomes of social norm transgressions. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5, 351–363. doi:10.1002/cb.1483
56.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2010). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
57.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.67.4.741
58.
RastD. E.GaffneyA. M.HoggM. A.CrispR. J. (2012). Leadership under uncertainty: When leaders who are non-prototypical group members can gain support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 646–653. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.013
59.
RaudenbushS. W. (2009). Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 295–315). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
RonayR.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Lex talionis: Testosterone and the law of retaliation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 702–705. doi:10.1037/e734282011–119
61.
RonayR.von HippelW. (2010). Power, testosterone and risk-taking: The moderating influence of testosterone and executive functions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439–526. doi:10.1002/bdm.671
RuckerD. D.DuBoisD.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 1015–1029. doi:10.1086/657162
64.
ScheepersD.SpearsR.DoosjeB.MansteadA. S. R. (2006). Diversity in in-group bias: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 944–960. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.90.6.944
65.
Schmid MastM. (2010). Interpersonal behaviour and social perception in a hierarchy: The interpersonal power and behaviour model. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 1–33. doi:10.1080/10463283.2010.486942
66.
ShepherdS.KayA. C.LandauM. J.KeeferL. A. (2011). Evidence for the specificity of control motivations in worldview defence: Distinguishing compensatory control from uncertainty management and terror management processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 949–958. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.026
67.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.LiuJ.PrattoF. (2000). Social dominance, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41–67. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099–0992(200001/02)30:1<41::aid-ejsp976>3.0.co;2-o
68.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
StamkouE.van KleefG. A. (2014). Do we give power to the right people? When and how norm violators rise to the top. In van ProoijenJ.-W.van LangeP. A. M. (Eds.), Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious about their leaders (pp. 33–52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SturmR. E.AntonakisJ. (2014). Interpersonal power: A review, critique, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41, 136–163. doi:10.1177/0149206314555769
71.
TroyerL.YountsL. C. (1997). Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first-order and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 692–732. doi:10.1086/231253
72.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
73.
Van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.FinkenauerC.BlakerN. M.HeerdinkM. W. (2012). Prosocial norm violations fuel power affordance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 937–942. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.022
74.
Van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.FinkenauerC.GündemirS.StamkouE. (2011). Breaking the rules to rise to power: How norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 500–507. doi:10.1177/1948550611398416
75.
Van KleefG. A.WandersF.StamkouE.HomanA. C. (2015). The social dynamics of breaking the rules: Antecedents and consequences of norm-violating behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 25–31. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.013
76.
Van KnippenbergB.van KnippenbergD. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 25–37. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.90.1.25
77.
Van KnippenbergD. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1078–1091. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.004
78.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.3.395
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
