The period of political terrorism named the “Years of Lead” (Anni di Piombo) started in Italy at the end of the 1960s and lasted until the late 1980s. The social wounds of this bloody time are still not healed, and there is a social debate about the opportunity to concede forgiveness to those responsible for those crimes. Drawing from the intergroup forgiveness literature, we tested a model explaining under which conditions forgiveness towards terrorists could be supported by Italian citizens. The model was tested in two generations: 331 Italian citizens who were adolescents or adults during the terrorism period and 208 Italian young adults born after the end of the Years of Lead. Findings showed that restorative justice beliefs and sociocognitive variables, like outgroup empathy and trust, were uniquely linked to forgiveness towards the terrorists.
AkaikeH. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In PetrovB. N.CsakiF. (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2.
AzarF.MulletE.VinsonneauG. (1999). The propensity to forgive, findings from Lebanon. Journal of Peace Research, 36, 169–181. doi:10.1177/0022343399036002003
3.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
4.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.107.2.238
5.
BentlerP. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.112.3.400
6.
BentlerP. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
7.
BrewerM. B.AlexanderM. G. (2002). Intergroup emotions and images. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 209–225). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. New York, NY: Springer
9.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2006.00447.x
10.
CehajicS.BrownR.CastanoE. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2008.00634.x
11.
ConciA.GrignolliP.MosnaN. (Eds.). (2008). Sedie Vuote. Gli anni di piombo: Dalla parte delle vittime. Trento, IT: Il Margine.
12.
CorbettaP.CavazzaN.RoccatoM. (2009). Between ideology and social representations: Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and the meaning of the political left and right. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 622–641. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.008_45.x
13.
De KeijserJ. W.van der LeedenR.JacksonJ. L. (2002). From moral theory to penal attitudes and back: A theoretically integrated modeling approach. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 317–335. doi:10.1002/bsl.494
14.
DovidioJ. F.tenVergertM.StewartT. L.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonJ. D.EssesV. M.PearsonA. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537–1549. doi:10.1177/0146167204271177
15.
FasanellaG.PellegrinoG. (2005). La guerra civile. Torino, IT: Bur, Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli.
16.
FinlayK. A.StephanW. G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1720–1737. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2000.tb02464
17.
GrometD. M.DarleyJ. M. (2011). Political ideology and reactions to crime victims: Preferences for restorative and punitive responses. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 830–855. doi:10.1111/j.1740–1461.2011.01242.x
18.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HambergerJ.NiensU. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2006.00441.x
19.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.McLernonF.NiensU.NoorM. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of “The Troubles.” In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 193–215). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HewstoneM.LolliotS.SwartH.MyersE.VociA.AlRamiahA.CairnsE. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict. Peace and Conflict. Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 39–53. doi:10.1037/a0035582
21.
HewstoneM.MaslenH.CairnsE.TamTMyersE.LloydH. (2013). Intergroup forgiveness and apology: Psychological research and philosophical considerations. In LewisC. A.AmlôtR.AnsariH.LoewenthalK.CinnirellaM.BookeRogersM. (Eds.), Aspects of terrorism and martyrdom: Dying for good, dying for God (pp. 39–74). New York, NY: Edwin Mellen.
22.
HornseyM. J.WohlM. J. A. (2013). We are sorry: Intergroup apologies and their tenuous link with intergroup forgiveness. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 1–31. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.822206
23.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.GingesJ. (2013). Dehumanization, retributive and restorative justice, and aggressive versus diplomatic intergroup conflict resolution strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 181–192. doi:10.1177/0146167212472208
24.
LewickiR. J.WiethoffC. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In DeutschM.ColemanP. T. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86–107). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
MardiaK. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530. doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
26.
McAloneyK.McCrystalP.PercyA.McCartanC. (2009). Damaged youth: Prevalence of community violence exposure and implications for adolescent well-being in post-conflict Northern Ireland. Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 635–648. doi:10.1002/jcop.20322
27.
McDonaldR. P. (1985). Comments on D. J. Bartholomew “Foundations of factor analysis: Some practical implications.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 134–137. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8317.1985.tb00827.x
28.
McLernonF.CairnsE.HewstoneM. (2002). Views on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 14, 285–290. doi:10.1080/1367886022000016839
29.
MorrisonB.AhmedE. (2006). Restorative justice and civil society: Emerging practice, theory and evidence. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 209–215. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2006.00447.x
30.
MyersE.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2009). Impact of conflict on mental health in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of intergroup forgiveness and collective guilt. Political Psychology, 30, 269–290. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2008.00691.x
31.
NadlerA.LiviatanI. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459–470. doi:10.1177/0146167205276431
32.
NadlerA.SaguyT. (2004). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In LangholzH. J.StoutC. E. (Eds.), The psychology of diplomacy (pp. 29–46). New York, NY: Praeger.
33.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2006). Instrumental and socio-emotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the need-based model of socio-emotional reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
NoorM.BrownR.PrenticeG. (2008). Prospects for intergroup reconciliation: Social-psychological predictors of intergroup forgiveness and reparation in Northern Ireland and Chile. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
PelucchiS.BrambillaM. (2013, September). La ferita degli anni di piombo: percezioni generazionali a confronto. Paper presented at the XII National Congress of the Italian Association of Psychology (AIP), Padova, Italy.
36.
PembertonA. (2011). Al Qaeda and vicarious victims: Victimological insights into globalized terrorism. In LetschertR. MvanDijkJ. J. M. (Eds.), The new faces of victimhood: Globalization, transnational crimes and victim rights (pp. 233–252). Houten, The Netherlands: Springer.
PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: APA.
39.
RussellD. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629–1646. doi:10.1177/014616702237645
40.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
41.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.1.116
42.
StrelanP. G.FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R. (2011). Retributive and inclusive justice goals and forgiveness: The influence of motivational values. Social Justice Research, 24, 126–142. doi:10.1007/s11211–011–0132–9
43.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
44.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136. doi:10.1177/1368430207071345
45.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.MarinettiC.GeddesL.ParkinsonB. (2008). Postconflict reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2008.00563.x.
46.
Van TongerenD. R.BurnetteJ. L.O’BoyleE.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.ForsythD. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of intergroup forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 81–95. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.844268
47.
VerdoolaegeA. (2012). Public reconciliation at the South African TRC: The impact of the Victim Hearings. In vanStokkomB. A. M.DoornN.vanTongerenP. (Eds.), Public forgiveness in post-conflict contexts (pp. 203–22). Portland, Antwerp: Intersentia.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G. (2014). On the relationship between justice and forgiveness: Are all forms of justice made equal?British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 463–483. doi:10.1111/bjso.12040
50.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G.FeatherN. T.PlatowM. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389. doi:10.1007/s10979–007–9116–6
51.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 988–1006. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.6.988
53.
WohlM. J. A.HornseyM. J.BennettS. H. (2012). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 306–322. doi:0.1037/a0024838
54.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
