Machiavellianism has always been notorious, as it is egotistical and manipulative. This study aims to explore whether Machiavellian individuals would increase prosocial behavior to buffer death anxiety, based on Terror Management Theory. A total of 420 Chinese volunteers completed a survey regarding Machiavellianism, empathy (cognitive empathy, affective empathy), death anxiety, and prosocial behavior tendencies. The results indicated that affective empathy mediated the relationship between Machiavellianism and some types of prosocial behavior (total, altruistic, anonymous, compliant, dire and emotional), and the mediating effect was moderated by death anxiety. This finding revealed that although individuals with high levels of Machiavellianism were supposed to be callous, when suffering from death anxiety, they became more affective-empathetic, and thus more prosocial. Our study enriches the relationship between Machiavellianism and kindness.
Al AinS.CarreA.Fantini-HauwelC.BaudouinJ. Y.Besche-RichardC. (2013). What is the emotional core of the multidimensional machiavellian personality trait?Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00454.
2.
BereczkeiT.BirkasB.KerekesZ. (2010). The presence of others, prosocial traits, machiavellianism: A personality x situation approach. Social Psychology, 41(4), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000032
3.
BolinoM. C.GrantA. M. (2016). The bright side of being prosocial at work, and the dark side, too: A review and agenda for research on other-oriented motives, behavior, and impact in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 599–670. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260
4.
CacciatoreJ.ThielemanK.KillianM.TavasolliK. (2015). Braving human suffering: Death education and its relationship to empathy and mindfulness. Social Work Education, 34(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.940890
5.
CarloG.RandallB. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014033032440
6.
CastilleC. M.BucknerJ. E.ThoroughgoodC. N. (2016). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(4), 919–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3079-9
7.
ChenH.MezaJ. I.YanY.WuQ.LinX. (2021). Parental attachment and depression in adolescents: Moderation mediation model of empathy and gender. Current Psychology, 42, (7), 5898–5909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01698-4
8.
ChenX.LiuT.LiP.WeiW.ChaoM. (2020). The relationship between media involvement and death anxiety of self-quarantined people in the covid-19 outbreak in China: The mediating roles of empathy and sympathy. OMEGA--Journal of Death and Dying, 85(4), 974–989, https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820960283
9.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(85).
10.
De FreitasJ.SarkissianH.NewmanG. E.GrossmannI.De BrigardF.LucoA.KnobeJ. (2018). Consistent belief in a good true self in misanthropes and three interdependent cultures. Cognitive Science, 42(Suppl 1), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12505
DuncanZ.MarchE. (2019). Using tinder® to start a fire: Predicting antisocial use of tinder® with gender and the dark tetrad. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.014.
13.
FlorianV.MikulincerM.HirschbergerG. (2002). The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.527
14.
ForsythL.AnglimJ.MarchE.BilobrkB. (2021). Dark tetrad personality traits and the propensity to lie across multiple contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 177, 110792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110792.
GengY. G.SunB. Q.HuangJ. Y.ZhuY. Z.HanX. H. (2015). Dirty dozen and short dark triad: A Chinese validation of two brief meaures of the dark triad. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.02.013
GeorgeL. S.ParkC. L. (2016). Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000077
19.
GiammarcoE. A.VernonP. A. (2014). Vengeance and the dark triad: The role of empathy and perspective taking in trait forgivingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.010.
20.
GreimelE.Schulte-RütherM.KircherT.Kamp-BeckerI.RemschmidtH.FinkG. R.Herpertz-DahlmannB.KonradK. (2010). Neural mechanisms of empathy in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and their fathers. Neuroimage, 49(1), 1055–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.057
21.
GrueneisenS.WarnekenF. (2022). The development of prosocial behavior-from sympathy to strategy. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.005.
22.
HartW.TortorielloG. K.RichardsonK. (2019). Feeling good about oneself heightens, not hinders, the goodness in narcissism. Current Psychology, 38(5), 1399–1408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9993-5
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050
24.
HeymN.KibowskiF.BloxsomC. A.BlanchardA.HarperA.WallaceL.FirthJ.SumichA. (2021). The dark empathy: Characterising dark traits in the presence of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110172.
25.
HoffmanM. L.(1977). Empathy, its development and prosocial implications. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 25(25), 169–217.
26.
JinS. V.RyuE. (2021). “The greedy I that gives”-The paradox of egocentrism and altruism: Terror management and system justification perspectives on the interrelationship between mortality salience and charitable donations amid the covid-19 pandemic. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(1), 414–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12381
27.
JonasE.SchimelJ.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (2002). The Scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1342–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236834
28.
JonasonP. K.DavisM. D. (2018). A gender role view of the dark triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.004.
29.
JonasonP. K.KrauseL. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the dark triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.027
30.
JonasonP. K.StrosserG. L.KrollC. H.DuineveldJ. J.BaruffiS. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The dark triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.045.
31.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
32.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
33.
PaalT.BereukeiT. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.021
34.
PajevicM.Vukosavljevic-GvozdenT.StevanovicN.NeumannC. S. (2018). The relationship between the dark tetrad and a two-dimensional view of empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.009.
35.
PangY. L.SongC.MaC. (2022). Effect of different types of empathy on prosocial behavior: Gratitude as mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 768827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.768827.
36.
PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory: From genesis to revelation. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 52, 1–70, Academic Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.03.001
SmithA. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
39.
TemplerD. I. (1970). The construction and validation of a death anxiety scale. The Journal of General Psychology, 82(2d Half), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1970.9920634
40.
Van DoesumN. J.Van LangeD. A. W.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032540
41.
WaiM.TiliopoulosN. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
42.
WenZ. L.YeB. J. (2014). Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 731–745. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731
43.
WertagA.RibarM.BratkoD. (2018). The relations of basic and dark personality traits with prosocial tendencies: Exploring gender differences. Psihološka Istraživanja, 21(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.5937/PsiIstra1802201W
44.
YangH.LiY. L.YaoQ. L.WenX. J. (2013). Applications of the Chinese version templer-death anxiety scale: Enlightenment for death education. Journal of Nursing Science, 28(21), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.3870/hlxzz.2013.21.064
45.
YumY. O.Schenck-HamlinW. (2005). Reactions to 9/11 as a function of terror management and perspective taking. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.145.3.265-286
46.
ZaleskiewiczT.GasiorowskaA.KesebirP. (2015). The scrooge effect revisited: Mortality salience increases the satisfaction derived from prosocial behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.005.
47.
ZhangF. F.DongY.WangK.ZhanZ. Y.XieL. F. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the interpersonal reactivity index-c. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(02),155–157. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2014.20.130
48.
ZhongR.PaluchR. M.ShumV.ZatzickC. D.RobinsonS. L. (2021). A person-centered perspective of death awareness during the covid-19 pandemic. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000931
49.
ZuoS.WangF.XuY.WangF.ZhaoX. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the dark gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual’s self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076.
