Trustworthiness and Ideological Similarity (But Not Ideology) Promote Empathy

Abstract

The current highly polarized U.S. political culture impedes people’s ability to live and work together effectively. Here we examine one factor that may play a role: selective empathy based on shared political ideology. Across seven studies (N = 3,476), participants read about a hypothetical politician and his political ideology, trustworthiness, or both. Participants reported their empathy for the politician after learning he was fined (Studies 1–6) or injured (Study 7). When trustworthiness alone was manipulated, liberals and conservatives expressed similar levels of empathy, with greater empathy for the more trustworthy politician. However, when the politician’s ideology alone was manipulated, participants reported greater empathy for the politician who shared their ideology. When trustworthiness and ideology were manipulated, selective empathy was observed when the politician was trustworthy. Participant ideology alone had little effect on empathy. The results suggest that empathy is sensitive to both trustworthiness and ideological match, but not ideology itself.

Keywords

empathy trust political ideology political polarization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bäckström

Björklund

(2007). Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 10–17.

Bakker

B. N.

Schumacher

Gothreau

Arceneaux

(2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 613–621.

Batson

C. D.

(2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–134). APA Books.

Batson

C. D.

Fultz

Schoenrade

P. A.

(1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), 19–39.

Benabou

Tirole

(2006). Belief in a just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 699–746.

Brandt

M. J.

Reyna

Chambers

J. R.

Crawford

J. T.

Wetherell

(2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 27–34.

Chandler

Sisso

Shapiro

(2020). Participant carelessness and fraud: Consequences for clinical research and potential solutions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(1), 49–55.

Chiao

Mathur

Harada

Lipke

(2009). Neural basis of preference for human social hierarchy versus egalitarianism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 174–181.

Cikara

Bruneau

E. G.

Saxe

R. R.

(2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 149–153.

10.

Cohen

(1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249–253.

11.

Combs

D. J. Y.

Powell

C. A. J.

Schurtz

D. R.

Smith

R. H.

(2009). Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: The sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 635–646.

12.

Crawford

J. T.

Brandt

M. J.

(2020). Ideological (a) symmetries in prejudice and intergroup bias. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 40–45.

13.

Davis

M. H.

(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.

14.

Decety

Jackson

P. L.

(2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 54–58.

15.

Doherty

(2017, October 5). Key takeaways on Americans’ growing partisan divide over political values. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/10/05/takeaways-on-americans-growing-partisan-divide-over-political-values/

16.

Dovidio

J. F.

Allen

J. L.

Schroeder

D. A.

(1990). Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 249–260.

17.

Eisenberg

Miller

P. A.

(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91–119.

18.

Frimer

J. A.

Skitka

L. J.

Motyl

(2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12.

19.

Goldenberg

Halperin

van Zomeren

Gross

J. J.

(2016). The process model of group-based emotion: Integrating intergroup emotion and emotion regulation perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(2), 118–141.

20.

Gramlich

(2017, December 19). Far more Americans say there are strong conflicts between partisans than between other groups in society. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/19/far-more-americans-say-there-are-strong-conflicts-between-partisans-than-between-other-groups-in-society/

21.

Haidt

Graham

(2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116.

22.

Hasson

Tamir

Brahms

K. S.

Cohrs

J. C.

Halperin

(2018). Are liberals and conservatives equally motivated to feel empathy toward others? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1449–1459.

23.

Hoffman

M. L.

(2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In Lewis

Haviland-Jones

J. M.

Barrett

L. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 440–455). Guilford Press.

24.

Iyer

Koleva

Graham

Ditto

Haidt

(2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLOS ONE, 7(8), Article e42366.

25.

Johnson

N. D.

Mislin

A. A.

(2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889.

26.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

27.

Kahan

Peters

Dawson

Slovic

(2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 54–86.

28.

MacCallum

R. C.

Zhang

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

(2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.

29.

McAdams

D. P.

Albaugh

Farber

Daniels

Logan

R. L.

Olson

(2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978–990.

30.

McCue

C. P.

Gopoian

J. D.

(2000). Dispositional empathy and the political gender gap. Women & Politics, 21, 1–20.

31.

McFarland

(2010). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice. Political Psychology, 31, 453–477.

32.

Righetti

Finkenauer

(2011). If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 874–886.

33.

Royston

Altman

D. G.

Sauerbrei

(2006). Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: A bad idea. Statistics in Medicine, 25(1), 127–141.

34.

Simas

Clifford

Kirkland

(2020). How empathic concern fuels political polarization. American Political Science Review, 114, 258–269.

35.

Tetlock

P. E.

Vieider

F. M.

Patil

S. V.

Grant

A. M.

(2013). Accountability and ideology: When left looks right and right looks left. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 22–35.

36.

Toi

Batson

C. D.

(1982). More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 281–292.

37.

Washburn

A. N.

Skitka

L. J.

(2018). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 972–980.

38.

Waytz

Iyer

Young

Graham

(2016). Ideological differences in the expanse of empathy. In Valdesolo

Graham

(Eds.), Social psychology of political polarization (pp. 61–77). Routledge.

39.

Zmigrod

Rentfrow

P. J.

Robbins

T. W.

(2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149, 407–418.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.85 MB