Research demonstrates that religiosity and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) are positively correlated (Altemeyer & Hunsberger, 1992). The extent to which this relationship holds across the population, however, is unknown. Because support for conformity and tradition—values fostered by religion (Saroglou, Delpierre, & Dernelle, 2004) and consonant with RWA (Altemeyer, 1996)—may be facilitated by the perception that the status quo is fair, endorsement of system-justifying beliefs should moderate the relationship between religiosity and RWA. We tested this hypothesis in a national probability sample of religiously identified New Zealanders (N = 1,600). As predicted, church attendance was associated with a steep initial increase, followed by a gradual plateau, in RWA. This relationship was, however, stronger for those who were high (vs. low) in system justification. These findings provide the first demonstration that system-justifying beliefs strengthen the relationship between religiosity and RWA, while simultaneously broadening the scope of system justification theory.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality (Vol. 1). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice (25th anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
3.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. doi:10.1037/h0021212
4.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
6.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP.VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126–139. doi:10.1177/1088868309352179
8.
HardingJ. F.SibleyC. G. (2013). The palliative function of system justification: Concurrent benefits versus longer-term costs to wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 401–418. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0101-1
9.
HunsbergerB. (1995). Religion and prejudice: The role of religious fundamentalism, quest, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 113–129. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.1995.tb01326.x
10.
HunsbergerB. (1996). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6(1), 39–49. doi:10.1207/s15327582ijpr0601_5
11.
JohnsonM. K.LabouffJ. P.RowattW. C.Patock-PeckhamJ. A.CarlisleR. D. (2012). Facets of right-wing authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468–5906.2011.01622.x
12.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8309.1994.tb01008.x
13.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2004.00402.x
14.
JostJ. T.Chaikalis-PetritsisV.AbramsD.SidaniusJ.van der ToornJ.BrattC. (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 197–208. doi:10.1177/0146167211422544
15.
JostJ. T.HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A.HennesE. P.SternC.GoslingS. D.GrahamJ. (in press). Belief in a just God (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0033220
16.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
17.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963–7214.2005.00377.x
18.
JostJ. T.PelhamB. W.SheldonO.SullivanB. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
19.
KayA. C.GaucherD.PeachJ. M.LaurinK.FriesenJ.ZannaM. P.SpencerS. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 421–434. doi:10.1037/a0015997
20.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.85.5.823
21.
LeakG. K.RandallB. A. (1995). Clarification of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: The role of religious maturity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(2), 245–252. doi:10.2307/1386769
22.
MalkaA.SotoC. J.CohenA. B.MillerD. T. (2011). Religiosity and social welfare: Competing influences of cultural conservatism and prosocial value orientation. Journal of Personality, 79(4), 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00705.x
23.
McClearyD. F.QuillivanC. C.FosterL. N.WilliamsR. L. (2011). Meta-analysis of correlational relationships between perspectives of truth in religion and major psychological constructs. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(3), 163–180. doi:10.1037/a0022208
24.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
25.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 991–1004. doi:10.1177/0146167213487997
26.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 721–734. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005
27.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2007.01983.x
28.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. doi:10.1177/1088868308319226
29.
WakslakC. J.JostJ. T.TylerT. R.ChenE. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18(3), 267–274. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2007.01887.x
30.
WhiteP.GunstonJ.SalmondC.AtkinsonJ.CramptonP. (2008). Atlas of socioeconomic deprivation in New Zealand NZDep2006. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.
31.
WinkP.DillonM.PrettymanA. (2007). Religiousness, spiritual seeking, and authoritarianism: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(3), 321–335. doi:10.1111/j.1468–5906.2007.00361.x
32.
WylieL.ForestJ. (1992). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism and prejudice. Psychological Reports, 71(3f), 1291–1298. doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.71.3f.1291
