Diversity initiatives aim to improve outcomes for low-status groups in organizations. Yet they also may ironically act as legitimizing cues, leading to an assumption of fairness and reducing the detection of discrimination. We explored how group status (high-status majority vs. low-status minority) and beliefs about the fairness of the system influence when the mere presence of a diversity initiative will de-legitimize claims of discrimination against a company. Non-Hispanic Whites and Latino participants (N = 135) read a profile of a company that had or had not received diversity awards, and then read a discrimination claim brought against the company by a Latino employee. Whites in general, and Latinos high in system-justifying beliefs, saw the company with diversity-awards as more respectful and fair to minorities than the company with neutral awards and also derogated the discrimination claimant more. Perceived fairness mediated the effect on claimant derogation. Implications are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
3.
CoxT. H.BlakeS. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 5(3), 45–56. doi:10.2307/256391
4.
DobbinF. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
EcclestonC. P.KaiserC. R.KraynakL. R. (2010). Shifts in justice beliefs induced by Hurricane Katrina: The impact of claims of racism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 571–584. doi:10.1177/1368430210362436
6.
EdelmanL. B.FullerS. R.Mara-DritaI. (2001). Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1589–1641. doi:10.1086/321303
7.
EdelmanL. B.KriegerL. H.EliasonS. R.AlbistonC. RMellemaV. (2011). When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 888–954. doi:10.1086/661984
8.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
JostJ.BanajiM. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
10.
JostJ.BurgessD.MossoC. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In JostJ.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 363–390). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
JostJ.MajorB. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
KaiserC. R.MajorB. N.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL.ShapiroJ. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 504–519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
13.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 227–237. doi:10.1177/13684302030063001
14.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617. doi:10.1177/000312240607100404
15.
LegaultL.GutsellJ.InzlichtM. (2011). Ironic effects of anti-prejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1472–1477. doi:10.1177/0956797611427918
16.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
17.
MajorB.GramzowR.McCoyS.LevinS.SchmaderT.SidaniusJ. (2002). Attributions to discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.269
18.
MarquesJ. (2010). Colorful window dressing: A critical review on workplace diversity in three major American corporations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4), 435–446. doi:10.1002/hrdq.20045
19.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. N. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1718–1729. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
20.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444–446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x
21.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DiltmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
22.
RichardO. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177. doi:10.2307/1556374
23.
RynesS.RosenB. (1995). A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of training. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 247–270. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01756.x
24.
ShenJ.ChandaA.D’NettoB.MongaM. (2009). Managing diversity through human resource management: An international perspective and conceptual framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 235–251. doi:10.1080/09585190802670516
25.
UnzuetaM. M.BinningK. R. (2010). Which racial groups are associated with diversity?Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 443–446. doi:10.1037/a0019723
26.
Velez et al. v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 04Civ.09194 (2010).
27.
VerkuytenM. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.121
