Previous research has found that among low-status individuals, both group identification (GID) and status-legitimizing beliefs (SLBs) motivate varying responses to ingroup discrimination claimants. SLBs are traditionally thought to motivate decreased support for low-status claimants, while GID is thought to motivate increased liking and support of ingroup members. The current research examines these conflicting influences on ingroup claimants among women (Studies 1a and 1b) and Latino/as (Studies 2 and 3). We find that when SLBs are strongly endorsed (Studies 1a, 1b, and 2) or primed (Study 3), GID does not predict liking or support for a claimant. Only when SLB endorsement is low and identity safety cues are absent does GID predict liking and support for a claimant. Our results suggest that when motivations conflict, SLBs seem to more strongly predict reactions to ingroup claimants.
AbramsD.MarquesJ. M.BownN.HensonM. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912. doi:10.1O37//O022-3514.78.5.9O6
2.
AshmoreR. D.DeauxK. D.McLaughlin-VolpeT. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
3.
BradyL. M.KaiserC. R.MajorB.KirbyT. A. (2015). It’s fair for us: Diversity structures cause women to legitimize discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 100-110. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.11.010
4.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
5.
BranscombeN. R.WannD. L.NoelJ. G.ColemanJ. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 381-388. doi:10.1177/0146167293194003
6.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532-544. doi:10.1177/0146167202250923
7.
DoddE. H.GiulianoT. A.BoutellJ. M.MoranB. E. (2001). Respected or rejected: Perceptions of women who confront sexist remarks. Sex Roles, 45, 567-577. doi:10.1023/A:1014866915741
8.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2014). Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 485-493. doi:10.1177/1368430213502560
9.
GarciaD. M.ReserA. H.AmoR. B.RedersdorffS.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Perceivers’ responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 769-780. doi:10.1177/0146167204271584
10.
GarciaD. M.SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.EllemersN. (2010). Women’s reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 733-745. doi:10.1002/ejsp.644
11.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
12.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
13.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
14.
KaiserC. R.DyrenforthP. S.HagiwaraN. (2006). Why are attributions to discrimination interpersonally costly? A test of system- and group-justifying motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1523-1536. doi:10.1177/0146167206291475
15.
KaiserC. R.HagiwaraN.MalahyL. W.WilkinsC. L. (2009). Group identification moderates attitudes toward ingroup members who confront discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 770-777. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.027
16.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL. M.ShapiroJ. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504-519. doi:10.1037/a0030838
17.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263. doi:10.1177/0146167201272010
18.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 227-237. doi:10.1177/13684302030063001
19.
KaiserC. R.WilkinsC. L. (2010). Group identification and prejudice: Theoretical and empirical advances and implications. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 461-476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01656.x
KluegelJ. R.SmithE. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
LaurinK.FitzsimonsG. M.KayA. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 149-171. doi:10.1037/a0021343
23.
LevinS.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.FedericoC. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00109
24.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime. com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior research methods, 49(2), 433-442.
25.
LoweryB. S.UnzuetaM. M.KnowlesE. D.GoffP. A. (2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 961-974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.961
26.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318. doi:0.1177/0146167292183006
27.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068-1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
28.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393-421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
29.
MajorB.QuintonW. J.SchmaderT. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220-231. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00547-4
30.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1970). The German ideology (ArthurC. J., Ed.). New York, NY: International Publishers. (Original work published 1846)
31.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341-351. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137
32.
McCoyS. K.WellmanJ. D.CosleyB.SaslowL.EpelE. (2013). Is the belief in meritocracy palliative for members of low-status groups? Evidence for a benefit for self-esteem and physical health via perceived control. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 307-318. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1959
33.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718-1729. doi:10.1177/0146167205278261
34.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT.GarciaA. (2014). The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 921-948. doi:10.1037/a0035754
35.
SchultzJ. R.MaddoxK. B. (2013). Shooting the messenger to spite the message? Exploring reactions to claims of racial bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 346-358. doi:10.1177/0146167212475223
36.
SearsD. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-250. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.233
37.
SheltonJ. N.StewartR. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215-223. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x
38.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017.CBO9781139175043
39.
Son HingL. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P.GarciaD. M.GeeS. S.OraziettiK. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 433-450. doi:10.1037/a0024618
40.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say? Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1370
41.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
42.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43.
UnzuetaM. M.EverlyB. A.GutiérrezA. S. (2014). Social dominance orientation moderates reactions to Black and White discrimination claimants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 81-88. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.005
44.
WellmanJ. D.LiuX.WilkinsC. L. (2016). Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for affirmative action among White people. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 426-437. doi:10.1111/bjso.12133
45.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25, 439-446. doi:10.1177/0956797613508412
46.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.FlavinE. L.ManriqueJ. A. (2018). When men perceive anti-male bias: Status-legitimizing beliefs increase discrimination against women. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19, 282-290. doi:10.1037/men0000097
47.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.KaiserC. R. (2013). Status legitimizing beliefs predict positivity toward Whites who claim anti-White bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1114-1119. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.017
48.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.SchadK. D. (2017). Reactions to anti-male sexism claims: The moderating roles of status-legitimizing belief endorsement and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 173-185. doi:10.1177/1368430215595109
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
