Why do societal crises often lead to intergroup conflict? We propose that the interplay of unspecific threat and causal attributions differentially predicts increases in ethnic prejudice and anti-Semitism. We tested this hypothesis in the context of the 2008 financial crisis. The results of Study 1 (N = 890) demonstrated on the basis of representative survey data that threat elicited by the financial crisis was related with ethnic prejudice once the cause was attributed to immigrants, whereas it was related with anti-Semitism once the cause of the crisis was attributed to bankers and speculators. In Study 2 (N = 157), we experimentally manipulated threat and type of causal attributions and replicated the results of Study 1. Moreover, we found that regardless of the threat manipulation, participants did not respond with increased prejudice against out-groups if a system-level explanation for the crisis, namely the economic system, was salient.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
AsbrockF.LemmerG.WagnerU.BeckerJ.KollerJ. (2009). Das Gefühl macht den Unterschied. Emotionen gegenüber „Ausländern“ in Ost- und Westdeutschland [The feeling makes the difference. Emotions towards immigrants in Eastern and Western Germany]. In HeitmeyerW. (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände. Folge 7 [German States. Sequal 7] (pp. 152–167). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
3.
BainsG. (1983). Explanations and the need for control. In HewstoneM. (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 126–143). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4.
BergmannW. (2002). Geschichte des Antisemitismus [History of Anti-Semitism]. Munich, Germany: Beck.
5.
BergmannW. (2008). Anti-Semitic attitudes in Europe: A comparative perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 343–362.
6.
BoboL. D. (1999). Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues, 17, 445–472.
7.
ButzD. A.YogeeswaranK. (2011). Another threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 22–27.
8.
ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1662–1674.
9.
CottrellC.NeubergS. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.
10.
CrottyJ. (2009). Structural causes of the global financial crisis: A critical assessment of the “new financial architecture.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 563–580.
11.
DollardJ.DoobL.MillerN.MowrerO.SearsR. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
EssesV. M.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.
13.
FeaginJ. R. (1972). Poverty: We still believe that God helps those who help themselves. Psychology Today, 6, 101–129.
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
15.
FriedländerS. (1997). Nazi Germany and the Jews: Vol. 1: The years of persecution, 1933–1939. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
16.
GallikerM.HermanJ.ImmingerK.WeimerD. (1998). The investigation of contiguity. Co-occurrence analysis of print media using CD-ROMs as a new data source, illustrated by a discussion on migrant delinquency in a daily newspaper. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 200–219.
17.
GlickP. (2002). Sacrificial lambs dressed in wolves’ clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and the scapegoating of Jews. In NewmanL. S.ErberR. (Eds.), Understanding genocide: The social psychology of the Holocaust (pp. 113–142). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
GreenD.GlaserJ.RichA. (1998). From lynching to gay bashing: The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 82–92.
19.
HeitmeyerW. (2002). Deutsche Zustände Folge 1 [German States, Series 1]. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.
20.
HeitmeyerW. (2010). Deutsche Zustände Folge 8 [German States, Series 8]. Berlin, Germany: Suhrkamp.
21.
HepworthJ.WestS. (1988). Lynchings and the economy: A time-series reanalysis of Hovland and Sears (1940). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 239–247.
22.
HewstoneM. (1989). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
HovlandC.SearsR. (1940). Minor studies in aggression: Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. Journal of Psychology, 9, 301–310.
24.
LernerM. J. (1980). Belief in a just world. New York, NY: Plenum.
25.
MarxK.EngelsF. (1867). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie [Capital. Critique of political economy]. Hamburg, Germany: Meissner.
26.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
27.
PostoneM. (1982). Nationalsozialismus und Antisemitismus. Ein theoretischer Versuch [National socialism and Anti-Semitism. A theoretical attempt]. In DinerD. (Ed.), Zivilisationsbruch. Denken nach Auschwitz [Violation of civilization. Thinking after Auschwitz] (pp. 242–254). Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.
28.
ReinhartC. M.KennethS. R. (2009). The aftermath of financial crisis. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 99, 466–472.
29.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 336–353.
30.
ScheepersP.GijsbertsM.CoendersM. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18, 17–34.
31.
SchlüterE.SchmidtP.WagnerU. (2008). Disentangling the causal relations of perceived group threat and out-group derogation: Cross-national evidence from German and Russian panel surveys. European Sociological Review, 24, 567–581.
32.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in intergroup relations. In MackieD.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions (pp. 191–208). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
33.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
TajfelH. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79–95.
35.
WagnerU.ChristO.HeitmeyerW. (2010). Anti-immigration bias. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 361–376). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
36.
WalkerI.WongN. K.KretzschmarK. (2002). Relative deprivation and attribution. From grievance to action. In WalkerI.SmithH. J. (Eds.), Relative deprivation. Specification, development and integration (pp. 288– 312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
WilsonT. C. (2001). Americans’ views on immigration policy: Testing the role of threatened group interests. Sociological Perspectives, 44, 659–707.
38.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R.KlarY. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.
