In a cross-cultural study, the authors tested whether the leadership role is more congruent with the masculine than the feminine gender role. Participants in Germany and Spain evaluated a male or a female candidate for a leadership position in an industry congruent or incongruent with the candidate's gender role, or in an unspecified industry. In line with the authors' hypotheses, the female candidate was perceived as less qualified for the position, especially when she worked in the incongruent industry. Spanish participants showed more prejudice against the female candidate than did German participants. Furthermore, when German participants predicted that the female candidate would succeed in obtaining the promotion, they made an internal causal attribution to explain this success. Spanish participants, however, sometimes made an external causal attribution. These results are consistent with the role congruity theory.
Bajdo, L.M., & Dickson, M.W. (2001). Perceptions of organizational culture and women's advancement in organizations: A cross-cultural examination. Sex Roles, 45, 399-414.
2.
Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665-692.
3.
Chemers, M.M. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review . In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 376-399). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4.
Cooper, V.W. (1997). Homophily or the queen bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28, 483-510.
5.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist , 39, 105-116.
6.
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations for successful performances on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80-85.
7.
Deaux, K., White, L., & Farris, E. (1975). Skills vs. luck: Field and laboratory studies of male and female preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 629-636.
8.
Devine, P. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56, 5-18.
9.
Dickson, W., Hartog, D., & Mitchelson, J.K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729-768.
10.
Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
11.
Diekman, A.B., Eagly, A.H., Mladinic, A., & Ferreira, M.C. (2005). Dynamic stereotypes about women and men in Latin America and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 209-226.
12.
Duehr, E., & Bono, J.E. (2006). Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?Personnel Psychology, 59, 815.
13.
Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Eagly, A.H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Identity, leadership, and power (pp. 79-93). London : Sage.
15.
Eagly, A.H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 459-474.
16.
Eagly, A.H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly , 31, 1-12.
17.
Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.
18.
Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard University Business School Press.
19.
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
20.
Eagly, A.H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist , 54, 408-423.
21.
Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A.B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautmer (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315-338.
23.
Etaugh, C., & Brown, B. (1975). Perceiving the causes of failure of male and female performances. Developmental Psychology, 11, 103.
24.
Eurostat. (2006). 8 March 2006: International women's day. A statistical view of the life of women and men in the EU25. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/pls/portal/docs/PAGE/PGP_PRD_CAT_PREREL/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2006/PGE_CAT_PREREL_YEAR_2006_MONTH_03/3-06032006-EN-BP1.PDF
25.
Feather, N.T., & Simon, J.G. (1975). Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 20-31.
26.
Garcia-Retamero, R. (2006). Identidad de género y nivel de aspiraciones profesionales en alumnos universitarios [Gender identity and level of career aspirations in college students]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 23, 217-224.
27.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2002). Percepción y evaluación de la mujer en liderazgo como explicación de la discriminación de la mujer en puestos de dirección [Perception and evaluation of women in leadership as the reasons for the discrimination of women in leadership positions]. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 12, 21-52.
28.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006a). Congruencia de rol de género y liderazgo: El papel de las atribuciones causales sobre el éxito y el fracas [Congruence of gender roles and leadership: The role of causal attributions of success and failure]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología , 38, 245-257.
29.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006b). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership . Sex Roles, 55, 51-61.
30.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
31.
Heilman, M.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
32.
Heilman, M.E., & Okimoto, T.G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology , 92, 81-92.
33.
Heilman, M.E., & Parks-Stamm, E.J. (2007). Gender stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women's career progress. In S. J. Correll (Ed.), Social psychology of gender: Advances in group processes (Vol. 24, pp. 47-78). Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Ltd., JAI Press.
34.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. London: Sage.
38.
House, R.J., Javidan, M., & Dorfman, P. (2001). Project GLOBE: An introduction. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 489-505.
39.
House, R.J., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 3-10.
40.
Human Development Report. (2003). Millennium development goals: A compact among nations to end human poverty . Retrieved August 4, 2006, from http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2003/pdf/hdr03_complete.pdf
41.
Human Development Report. (2006). Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/pdfs/report/HDR06-complete.pdf
42.
Hyde, J.S. (1985). Half the human experience: The psychology of women (3rd ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.
43.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Inglehart, R., Basánez, M., Díez-Medrano, J., Halmann, L., & Luijkx, R. (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 values surveys. Coyoacan, Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
45.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2007). Mujeres y hombres en España 2007 [Women and men in Spain 2007]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.
46.
Javidan, M., & House, R.J. (2001). Cultural acumen for the global manager: Lessons from Project GLOBE. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 289-305.
47.
Killeen, L.A., López-Zafra, E., & Eagly, A.H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 312-322.
48.
Kuenzler, J., Walter, W., Reichart, E., & Pfister, G. (2001). Gender division of labour in unified Germany. Retrieved April 21, 2006, from http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/soziologie/na_rep.pdf
49.
López-Sáez, M. (1994). Procesos culturales e individuales implicados en la estereotipia de género: Una aproximación empírica a la elección de carrera [Cultural and individual processes involved in gender stereotyping: An empirical approach to the choice of career]. Revista de Psicología Social , 9, 213-230.
50.
López-Zafra, E. (1999). Liderazgo femenino: Nuevas pautas para un nuevo milenio [Female leadership: New guidelines for a new millennium]. In M. A. Bel (Ed.), Ecofeminismo: Un reencuentro con la naturaleza (pp. 43-61). Jaén, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén.
51.
López Zafra, E., Garcia-Retamero, R., Diekman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (2008). Dinámica de estereotipos de género y poder: Un estudio transcultural. [Dynamic aspect of stereotypes of gender and power: A cross-cultural study]Revista de Psicología Social, 23, 213219.
52.
López-Zafra, E., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Eagly, A. (2009). Congruencia de rol de género y aspiraciones de las mujeres a posiciones de liderazgo. [Gender congruity and women's aspirations in leadership roles]Revista de Psicología Social, 24, 99108.
53.
Mathison, D.L. (1986). Sex differences in the perception of assertiveness among female managers. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 599-606.
54.
Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas. ( 2007). Empleo público: Sigue habiendo más presencia femenina en los grupos menos cualificados [Public employment: Women are still more in less skilled]. Retrieved August 10, 2007, from http://www.map.es/prensa/notas_de_prensa/notas/2007/08/2007080.html
55.
Mujeres-Universia. (2005). Cómo hemos cambiado [How we have changed]. Retrieved May 31, 2006 , from http://mujeres.universia.es/noticias/noticia_actualidad.jsp?noticia=84076
56.
Schein, V.E. (1973). The relationship of sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology , 57, 95-100.
57.
Schein, V.E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 340-344.
58.
Schein, V.E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
59.
Schein, V.E., & Mueller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite men characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 13, 439-447.
60.
Schein, V.E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon ? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41.
61.
Sczesny, S., Bosak, J., Neff, D., & Schyns, F. (2004). Gender stereotypes and the attribution of leadership traits: A cross-cultural comparison. Sex Roles, 51, 631-645.
62.
Swim, J.K., & Sanna, L.J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507-522.
63.
Taylor, L., Newman, S., Mangis, C., Swiander, M., Garibaldi, C., Ismael, A., et al. (1993). Gender and attribution: A reversal of bias ? Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 575-582.
64.
United Nations Development Programme. (2004 ). Human development report 2004: Cultural liberty in today's diverse world. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2006). Statistics and indicators on women and men. Retrieved January 14, 2007, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/indwm/statistics.htm
66.
Van Vianen, A.E.M., & Fischer, A.H. (2002). Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 315-337.
67.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion . New York: Springer.
68.
Wilde, A., & Diekman, A.B. (2005). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in dynamic stereotypes: A comparison between Germany and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 188-196.
69.
Williams, J.E., & Best, D.L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
70.
Williams, J.E., Satterwhite, R.C., & Best, D.L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40, 513-525.
71.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699-727.
72.
World Economic Forum. (2005). Women's empowerment: Measuring the global gender gap. Retrieved January 13, 2007, from http://ncwo-online.org/data/images/WorldEconomicForum.pdf
