This experiment (N = 68 dyads) tested the influence of experience and advice on behavior and joint outcomes in integrative two-party negotiations. Dyads in an advice condition received short tactical advice to question fixed-pie assumptions and to exchange information. Afterward, they negotiated once. Dyads in an experience condition negotiated twice in successive rounds. Finally, dyads in an experience-and-advice condition negotiated twice and received advice prior to the second negotiation. Dependent measures were negotiation behavior, negotiation duration, joint outcome, and judgmental accuracy. Results showed that the combination of advice and experience led dyads to apply more problem solving and fewer contentious strategies, which mediated the higher joint outcomes that these dyads reached in shorter times. Experience or advice alone was not sufficient to make negotiators use different strategies or to exploit the integrative potential of the negotiations better than they did before they received advice and/or gained experience.
Bazerman, M.H., & Neale, M.A. (1983). Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to effective dispute resolution. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations (pp. 51—67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D.G. (1984). Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 323—335.
4.
Berridge, G.R., Keens-Soper, M., & Otte, T.G. (2001). Diplomatic theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
5.
Carnevale, P.J.D., Pruitt, D.G., & Seilheimer, S.D. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111—120.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & Carnevale, P.J. (2003). Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 235—291). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Giebels, E., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability . Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 408—422.
9.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Koole, S., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information processing approach to integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 975—987.
10.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Weingart, L.R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives in integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889—905.
11.
Druckman, D. (1994). Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 507—556.
12.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreements without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
13.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 393—405.
14.
Harinck, F., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Vianen, A.E.M. (2000). The impact of conflict issues on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 329—358.
15.
Harvey, N., & Fischer, I. (1997). Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,70, 117—133.
16.
Harvey, N., Harries, C., & Fischer, I. (2000). Using advice and assessing its quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,81, 252—273.
17.
Kelley, H.H. (1966). A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict (pp. 49—73). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
18.
Kemp, K.E., & Smith, W.P. (1994). Information exchange, toughness, and integrative bargaining: The roles of explicit cues and perspective-taking. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 5—21.
19.
Kimmel, M.J., Pruitt, D.G., Magenau, J.M., & Carnevale, P.J. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 9—22.
Lewis, S.A., & Fry, W.R. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 75—92.
22.
Lim, J.S., & O'Connor, M. (1995). Judgmental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making , 8, 149—168.
23.
Nadler, J., Thompson, L., & Van Boven, L. (2003). Learning negotiation skills: Four models of knowledge creation and transfer. Management Science,49, 529—540.
24.
Neale, M.A., & Bazerman, M.H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press .
25.
Pruitt, D.G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York : Academic Press.
26.
Pruitt, D.G., & Lewis, S.A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 31, 621—633.
27.
Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Rubin, J.Z., Pruitt, D.G., & Kim, S.H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Jentsch, F., Payne, S.C., & Salas, E. (1996). Can pretraining experiences explain individual differences in learning?Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 110—116.
30.
Sonnentag, S. (1998). Expertise in professional software design: A process study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 703—715.
31.
Thompson, L. (1990a). An examination of naive and experienced negotiators . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 82—90.
32.
Thompson, L. (1990b). The influence of experience on negotiation performance . Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 26, 528—544.
33.
Thompson, L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 27, 161—179.
34.
Thompson, L., & DeHarpport, T. (1994). Social judgment, feedback, and interpersonal learning in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 327—345.
35.
Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 98—123.
36.
Ury, W. (1992). Getting past no: Negotiating with difficult people . London: Century Business.
37.
Van Boven, L., & Thompson, L. (2003). A look into the mind of the negotiator: Mental models in negotiation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,6, 387—404.
38.
Weingart, L.R., Hyder, E.B., & Prietula, M.J. (1996). Knowledge matters: The effect of tactical descriptions on negotiation behavior and outcome. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1205—1217.
39.
Yaniv, I. (2004). Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 93, 1—13.
40.
Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 260—281.
41.
Zetik, D.C., & Stuhlmacher, A.F. (2002). Goal setting and negotiation performance: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,5, 35—52.
