We examined how surface-level diversity (based on race) and deep-level similarities influenced three-person decision-making groups on a hidden-profile task. Surface-level homogeneous groups perceived their information to be less unique and spent less time on the task than surface-level diverse groups. When the groups were given the opportunity to learn about their deep-level similarities prior to the task, group members felt more similar to one another and reported greater perceived attraction, but this was more true for surface-level homogeneous than surface-level diverse groups. Surface-level homogeneous groups performed slightly better after discovering deep-level similarities, but discovering deep-level similarities was not helpful for surface-level diverse groups, who otherwise outperformed surface-level homogeneous groups. We discuss the implications of this research for managing diversity in the workplace.
Abrams, D. M. , Wetherell, M. , Cochrane, S. , Hogg, M. A. , & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119 .
2.
Allen, V. L. , & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, beliefs similarity, and intergroup discrimination . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977 .
3.
Allen, V. L. , & Wilder, D. A. (1979). Group categorization and attribution of belief similarity . Small Group Behavior, 10, 73-80 .
4.
Antonio, A. L. , Chang, M. J. , Hakuta, K. , Kenny, D. A. , Levin, S. , & Milem, J. F. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students . Psychological Science, 15, 507-510 .
5.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
6.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implication for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
7.
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press .
8.
Chen, F. F. , & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 111-125 .
9.
Diehl, M. (1988). Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination . British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 289-300 .
10.
Eagly, A. H. (1967). Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 15-15 .
11.
Ely, R. , & Thomas, D. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes . Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273 .
12.
Franz, T. M. , & Larson, J. R., Jr. (2002). The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion . Small Group Research, 33, 383-411 .
13.
Gaertner, S., L. , Dovidio, J. F. , Banker, B. S. , Houlette, M. , Johnson, K. M. , & McGlynn, E. A. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation . Group Dynamics, 4, 98-114 .
14.
Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J. , Murrell, A. , & Dovidio, J. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249 .
15.
Gruenfeld, D. H. , Mannix, E. A. , Williams, K. Y. , & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15 .
16.
Harrison, D. A. , Price, K. H. , & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion . Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107 .
17.
Harrison, D. A. , Price, K. H. , Gavin, J. A. , & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning . Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045 .
18.
Holtz, R. , & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 890-898 .
19.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264 .
20.
Jackson, S. E. , Joshi, A. , & Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications . Journal of Management, 29, 801-830 .
21.
Jackson, S. E. , May, K. E. , & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team decision-making effectiveness in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
22.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement . Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229 .
23.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
24.
Jehn, K. , Northcraft, G. , & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups . Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763 .
25.
Jehn, K. A. , & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 775-790 .
26.
Jetten, J. , Postmes, T. , & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). ‘We’re all individuals’: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat . European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207 .
27.
Klein, K. J. , & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research . Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211-236 .
28.
Kramer, R. , & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057 .
29.
Larson, J. R., Jr. , Christensen, C. , Abbott, A. S. , & Franz, T. M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330 .
30.
Larson, J. R., Jr. , Christensen, C. , Abbott, A. S. , & Franz, T. M. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision-making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 93-108 .
31.
Liljenquist, K. A. , Galinsky, A. D. , & Kray, L. J. (2004). Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind-sets for information sharing and group coordination . Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 263-279 .
32.
Milliken, F. J. , & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups . Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433 .
33.
Northcraft, G. B. , & Martin, J. (1982). Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. In B. Gutek (Ed.), Sex role stereotyping and affirmative action policy (pp. 81-130). Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, UCLA .
34.
Pelled, L. H. , Eisenhardt, K. M. , & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance . Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28 .
35.
Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13 .
36.
Phillips, K. W. , & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 143-160 .
37.
Phillips, K. W. , Mannix, E. , Neale, M. , & Gruenfeld, D. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 498-510 .
38.
Polzer, J. T. , Milton, L. P. , & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2002). Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups . Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 296-324 .
39.
Postmes, T. , Haslam, A. , & Swaab, R. I. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation . European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42 .
40.
Postmes, T. , Spears, R. , & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930 .
41.
Schittekatte, M. , & Van Hiel, A. (1996). Effects of partially shared information and awareness of unshared information on information sampling . Small Group Research, 27, 431-449 .
42.
Schneider, S. K. , & Northcraft, G. B. (1999). Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: A social identity perspective . Human Relations, 52, 1445-1467 .
43.
Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L. Thompson , J. M. Levine , & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 49-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
44.
Stasser, G. , & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434 .
45.
Stasser, G. , Stewart, D. D. , & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265 .
46.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478 .
47.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93 .
48.
Stasser, G. , Vaughan, S. I. , & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116 .
49.
Stewart, D. D. , & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision-making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 619-628 .
50.
Swann, W. B., Jr. , Milton, L. P. , & Polzer, J. T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 238-250 .
51.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice . Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97 .
52.
Van Knippenberg, D. , De Dreu, C. K. W. , & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda . Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022 .
53.
Van Knippenberg, D. , & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend: Exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology and reality. In S. A. Haslam , D. van Knippenberg , M. Platow , & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 61-77). New York: Taylor & Francis .
54.
Watson, W. , Kumar, K. , & Michaelsen, L. (1993). Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups . Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602 .
55.
Westphal, J. D. , & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards . Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366-398 .
56.
Wilder, D. A. (1984). Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 323-333 .
57.
Williams, K. , & O’Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press .
58.
Winquist, J. R. , & Larson, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377 .
59.
Wittenbaum, G. M. (2000). The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high status members immune?Communication Research, 27, 379-401 .
60.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , & Bowman, J. M. (2004). A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 169-184 .
61.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , Hollingshead, A. B. , & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm . Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310 .
62.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , Hubbell, A. P. , & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978 .
63.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
