Several mediators of the similarity–liking link were examined in a laboratory study that involved previously unacquainted individuals interacting to become acquainted and that also included a preinteraction manipulation of bogus similarity. In addition to replicating the robust finding of a positive association between similarity and liking in both a bogus stranger paradigm and a social interaction paradigm, we tested the roles of five potential mediators of the similarity–liking association: consensual validation, cognitive evaluation, certainty of being liked, fun and enjoyment, and self-expansion opportunity. The results indicated certainty of being liked to be the strongest mediator prior to a live interaction and fun and enjoyment to be the strongest mediator postinteraction. Consensual validation was also found to be a strong mediator postinteraction.
AjzenI. (1974). Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 374–380. doi:10.1037/h0036002
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York, NY: Hemisphere.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.NormanC. (2001). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In ClarkM.FletcherG. (Eds.), Blackwell’s handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478–502). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
4.
AronA.MelinatE.AronE. N.ValloneR.BatorR. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377. doi:10.1177/0146167297234003
5.
AronA.NormanC. C.AronE. N.McKennaC.HeymanR. E. (2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.273
6.
AronA.ParisM.AronE. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1102
7.
AronA.SteeleJ. L.KashdanT. B.PerezM. (2006). When similars do not attract: Tests of a prediction from the self-expansion model. Personal Relationships, 13, 387–396. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00125.x
8.
AronsonE.WilsonT. D.AkertR. M. (2010). Interpersonal attraction: From first impressions to close relationships. In BaronR. A.BranscombeN. R. (Eds.), Social psychology (13th ed., pp. 286–321). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
AronsonE.WorchelP. (1966). Similarity vs. liking as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 5, 157–158. doi:10.3758/BF03328329
10.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
11.
BerzoffJ. (2015). H. S. Sullivan and his contribution to the relational school. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 85, 54–71.
12.
Bleske-RechekA.RemikerM. W.BakerJ. P. (2009). Similar from the start: Assortment in young adult dating couples and its link to relationship stability over time. Individual Differences Research, 7, 142–158.
13.
BlistenD. R. (1953). The social theories of Harry Stack Sullivan. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
BurlesonB. R. (1998). Similarities in social skills, interpersonal attraction, and the development of personal relationships. In TrentJ. S. (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the 21st century (pp. 77–84). Boston, MA: Allyn and Beacon.
15.
BurlesonB. R.KunkelA. W.BirchJ. D. (1994). Thoughts about talk in romantic relationships: Similarity makes for attraction (and happiness, too). Communication Quarterly, 42, 259–273. doi:10.1080/01463379409369933
16.
ByrneD. E. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713–715. doi:10.1037/h0044721
17.
ByrneD. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.
18.
ByrneD. E.CloreG. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103–128.
19.
ByrneD. E.WongT. J. (1962). Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 246–253. doi:10.1037/h0047299
20.
CondonJ. W.CranoW. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 789–797. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.789
21.
DuckS. W.CraigG. (1978). Personality similarity and the development of friendship: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 237–242. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1978.tb00272.x
22.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.EaglyA. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1012–1032. doi:10.1037/a0024062
23.
FehrB. (2008). Friendship formation. In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ. H. (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 29–54). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
24.
FelmleeD. H. (1995). Fatal attractions: Affection and disaffection in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 295–311. doi:10.1177/0265407595122009
25.
FestingerL. A. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
26.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W. (2015). Interpersonal attraction: In search of a theoretical Rosetta Stone. In SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 179–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
GreitemeyerT. (2010). Effects of reciprocity on attraction: The role of a partner’s physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships, 17, 317–330. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01278.x
28.
HamptonA. J.SprecherS. (2017). Consensual validation. In Ziegler-HillV.ShackelfordT. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Advance online publication. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1287 -1
29.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
30.
HoyleR. H. (1993). Interpersonal attraction in the absence of explicit attitudinal information. Social Cognition, 11, 309–320. doi:10.1521/soco.1993.11.3.309
31.
KaplanM. F.AndersonN. H. (1973). Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 301–312. doi:10.1037/h0035112
32.
KennyD. A.KashyD.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD.FiskeS.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
33.
McCroskeyJ. C.McCainT. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261–266. doi:10.1080/03637757409375845
34.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 696–712. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.696
35.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S. (2014). A two-dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 59–86. doi:10.1177/1088868313501887
36.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–923. doi:10.1177/0265407508096700
37.
MorryM. M.KitoM.OrtizL. (2011). The attraction-similarity model and dating couples: Projection, perceived similarity, and psychological benefits. Personal Relationships, 18, 125–143. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01293.x
38.
SedikidesC.CampbellW. K.ReederG. D.ElliotA. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
39.
SheatherS. J. (2009). A modern approach to regression with R. New York, NY: Springer.
40.
SinghR.ChenF.WegenerD. T. (2014). The similarity-attraction link: Sequential versus parallel multiple-mediator models involving inferred attraction, respect, and positive affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 281–298.
41.
SinghR.TayY. Y.SankaranK. (2017). Causal role of trust in interpersonal attraction from attitude similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 717–731. doi:10.1177/0265407516656826
42.
SinghR.TengJ. S. Q.BhullarN.SankaranK. (2018). Positive affect as a moderator of liking effects on trust and attraction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 13–21. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12192
43.
SinghR.WegenerD. T.SankaranK.BhullarN.AngK. Q. P.ChiaP. J. L.…ChenF. (2017). Attitude similarity and attraction: Validation, positive affect, and trust as sequential mediators. Personal Relationships, 24, 203–222. doi:10.1111/pere.12178
44.
SinghR.YeoS. E.LinP. K. F.TanL. (2007). Multiple mediators of the attitude similarity-attraction relationship: Dominance of inferred attraction and subtlety of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 61–74. doi:10.1080/01973530701331007
45.
SprecherS. (2013). Correlates of couples’ perceived similarity at the initiation stage and currently. Interpersona, 7, 180–195. doi:10.5964/ijpr.v7i2.126
46.
SprecherS. (2014). Effects of actual (manipulated) and perceived similarity on liking in get-acquainted interactions: The role of communication. Communication Monographs, 81, 4–27. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.839884
47.
SprecherS.TregerS.FisherA.HilaireN.GrzybowskiM. (2015). Associations between self-expansion and actual and perceived (dis)similarity and their joint effects on attraction in initial interactions. Self and Identity, 14, 369–389. doi:10.1080/15298868.2014.1003592
48.
SprecherS.TregerS.HilaireN.FisherA.HatfieldE. (2013a). You validate me, you like me, you’re fun, you expand me: “I’m yours!”Current Research in Social Psychology, 21, 22–34.
49.
SprecherS.TregerS.WondraJ. D. (2013b). Effects of self-disclosure role on liking closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 497–514. doi:10.1177/0265407512459033
50.
TidwellN. D.EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2013). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x
51.
TregerS.SprecherS.ErberR. (2013). Laughing and liking: Exploring the interpersonal effects of humor use in initial social interactions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 532–543. doi:10.1002/ejsp.196
