Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Studies on digital platforms and online incivility have established that uses of humour can lean towards cyberbullying and hate speech. Focusing on TikTok's affordances and cultures of online incivility, this paper studies how TikTok influencers and their audiences manoeuvre legal-but-harmful humour. Specifically, we study how online incivility has become an accepted and negotiated practice in the Filipino context through the phenomenon of ‘dogshows’, where users throw jabs at individuals using derogatory humour and provocative memes. Through online observation and textual analysis of TikTok posts and their corresponding comment sections, we demonstrate how online incivility is subtly amplified through humour and play, and how Gen Z and young children became both objects and producers of these dogshows. We argue that while there is already peer surveillance at work on TikTok, there needs to be more deliberation between TikTok's policies and at-risk groups to make the platform a more civil space.

Keywords

TikTok dogshow online incivility Gen Z Philippines social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

(2020a) Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal 12(1): 77–103.

Abidin

(2020b) L8r H8r: Commoditized privacy, influencer wars, and productive disorder in the influencer industry. In: Lind

(ed) Produsing Theory in a Digital World 3.0. New York: Peter Lang US, pp. 31–48.

Abidin

(2021) From ‘networked publics’ to ‘refracted publics’: A companion framework for researching ‘below the radar’ studies. Social Media + Society 7(1): 205630512098445.

AJ Marketing (n.d.) Top 20 TikTok Influencers in the Philippines in 2023. AJ Marketing. Available at: https://www.ajmarketing.io/post/top-20-tiktok-influencers-in-the-philippines (accessed 3 August 2023).

Albrechtslund

(2008) Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i3.2142.

Amurthalingam

(2023) The Top 5 TikTok Influencers in the Philippines. Meltwater, 17 August 2023. Available at: https://www.meltwater.com/en/blog/tiktok-influencers-philippines (accessed 3 August 2023).

Ancheta

MRG

(2015) Halakhak: Defining the ‘national’ in the humor of Philippine popular culture. Thammasat Review 14(1): 35–60. Available at: https://sc01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tureview/article/view/40801 (accessed 13 June 2024).

Andrejevic

(2005) The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society 2(4).

Bettadapur

(2020) Introducing the TikTok Asia Pacific Safety Advisory Council. TikTok, 22 September. Available at: https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-my/tiktok-apac-sac (accessed 22 September 2023).

10.

Bucher

Helmond

(2018) The affordances of social media platforms. In: Burgess

Marwick

Poell

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. London: Sage Publications, pp. 233–253.

11.

Cannell

(2001) Power and Intimacy in the Christian Philippines. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Charmaz

(2014) Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edition London: Sage Publications.

13.

Chen

(2017) Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

14.

Christin

Lewis

(2021) The drama of metrics: Status, spectacle, and resistance among YouTube drama creators. Social Media + Society 7(1): 205630512199966.

15.

Condren

McCausland

Phiddian

, et al. (2008) Defining parody and satire: Australian copyright law and its new exception: Part 2: Advancing ordinary definitions. Media and Arts Law Review 13(4): 401–421.

16.

Dasent

(2023) Tiktok: Globalization and the social identification of afrobeats. In: Akpan

(ed.) African Media Space and Globalization. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 287–302.

17.

Davis

(2020) How artifacts afford: The power and politics of everyday things. In: Design Thinking, Design Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

18.

Divon

(2022) Playful publics on TikTok: The memetic Israeli-Palestinian war of #CHALLENGE. In: Arkenbout

Scherz

(eds) Critical Meme Reader: Memetic Tacticality. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, pp. 88–105.

19.

Divon

Ebbrecht-Hartmann

(2022) #JewishTikTokThe JewToks’ Fight against antisemitism. In: Boffone

(ed.) Tiktok Cultures in the United States. Routledge Focus on Digital Media and Culture. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 47–58.

20.

Dumaual

(2022) What’s next for viral sensation AC Soriano? Indeed, ‘Papunta pa lang tayo sa exciting part.’ Available at: https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/04/22/22/papunta-pa-lang-tayo-sa-exciting-part (accessed 1 August 2023).

21.

Evans

Pearce

Vitak

, et al. (2017) Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research: Explicating affordances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22(1): 35–52.

22.

Fiske

(1994) Audiencing: Cultural practice and cultural studies. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 189–198.

23.

Gibson

(2014) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. New York: Psychology Press.

24.

Giumetti

Kowalski

(2022) Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology 45: 101314.

25.

gloria’s talking bracelet (2022) Dogshow. Urban Dictionary. Available from: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dogshow (accessed 1 August 2023).

26.

@heyrow (2022) [Twitter] 19 May. Available at: https://x.com/heyrow/status/1527187118728298496 (accessed 2 May 2023).

27.

@itsassagurl (2021) [TikTok] 16 February. Available at: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSLTuKfX4/ (accessed 2 May 2023).

28.

@itssassagurl (2022) [Twitter] 19 May. Available at: https://x.com/Itssassagurl/status/1527202643650588672?s=20 (accessed 1 August 2023).

29.

Jacobs

(2020) Smouldering pornographies on the Chinese internet. Porn Studies 7(3): 337–345.

30.

Kanai

(2019) On not taking the self seriously: Resilience, relatability and humour in young women’s tumblr blogs. European Journal of Cultural Studies 22(1): 60–77.

31.

Kaur-Gill

(2023) The cultural customization of TikTok: Subaltern migrant workers and their digital cultures. Media International Australia 186(1): 29–47.

32.

Kaye

DBV

Chen

Zeng

(2021) The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mobile Media & Communication 9(2): 229–253.

33.

Kemp

(2024) ‘Digital 2024: The Philippines’. DataReportal. Available at: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-philippines (accessed 28 September 2024).

34.

Lee

Abidin

(2021) Backdoor advertising scandals, Yingyeo culture, and cancel culture among YouTube influencers in South Korea. New Media & Society 26(1): 405–425.

35.

Lewis

(2018) Alternate Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube. Data & Society. Available at: https://datasociety.net/library/alternative-influence/ (accessed 01 May 2023).

36.

Lim

(2022) Media and peer culture: Young people sharing norms and collective identities with and through media. In: Lemish

(ed) The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents and Media. 2nd edition. Oxon: Routledge. pp. 347–354.

37.

Livingstone

(2014) Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications 39(3).

38.

Mahy

Winarnita

Herriman

(2022) Influencing the influencers: Regulating the morality of online conduct in Indonesia. Policy & Internet 14(3): 574–596.

39.

Markham

(2012) Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society 15(3): 334–353.

40.

Marwick

(2015) Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture 27(1): 137–160.

41.

Matamoros-Fernández

Bartolo

Troynar

(2023) Humour as an online safety issue: Exploring solutions to help platforms better address this form of expression. Internet Policy Review 12(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1677.

42.

Milner

(2013) Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz. Fibre Culture 22. Available at: https://twentytwo.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-156-hacking-the-social-Internet-memes-identity-antagonism-and-the-logic-of-lulz/ (accessed 20 May 2023).

43.

Ong

(2015) The Poverty of Television: The Mediation of Suffering in Class-Divided Philippines. London: Anthem Press.

44.

Ong

Cabañes

JVA

(2018) Architects of Networked Disinformation: Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News Production in the Philippines. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Available at: https://newtontechfordev.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ARCHITECTS-OF-NETWORKED-DISINFORMATION-FULL-REPORT.pdf (accessed 3 May 2023).

45.

Ong

Fallorina

Lanuza

, et al. (2022) Parallel Public Spheres: Influence Operations in the 2022 Philippine Elections. The Media Manipulation Case Book. Internews and Harvard Kennedy School Shorenstein Center. Available at: https://mediamanipulation.org/research/unmasking-influence-operations-in-the-philippines (accessed 3 August 2023).

46.

Papacharissi

(2004) Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society 6(2): 259–283.

47.

Parris

Lannin

Hynes

, et al. (2022) Exploring social media rumination: Associations with bullying, cyberbullying, and distress. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(5–6): NP3041–NP3061.

48.

Pertierra

(2018) Televisual experiences of poverty and abundance: Entertainment television in the Philippines. The Australian Journal of Anthropology 1(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12261.

49.

Phillips

(2018) The Oxygen of Amplification: Better Practices for Reporting on Extremists, Antagonists, and Manipulators Online. Data & Society. Available at: https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification/ (accessed 23 May 2023).

50.

Pryde

Prichard

(2022) Tiktok on the clock but the #fitspo don’t stop: The impact of TikTok fitspiration videos on women’s body image concerns. Body Image 43: 244–252.

51.

Radics

Abidin

(2022) Racial harmony and sexual violence: Uneven regulation and legal protection gaps for influencers in Singapore. Policy & Internet 14(3): 597–617.

52.

Roque

(2022) Words we enjoyed using this 2022. GMA Network. Available at: https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/hashtag/content/855606/words-we-enjoyed-using-this-2022/story/ (accessed 3 August 2023).

53.

Rose

(2016) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

54.

Sarwatay

Lee

Kaye

DBV

(2023) Exploring children’s TikTok cultures in India: Negotiating access, uses, and experiences under restrictive parental mediation. Media International Australia 186(1): 48–65.

55.

Shifman

(2013) Memes in Digital Culture. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

56.

Soriano

Cabalquinto

Panaligan

(2021) Performing ‘digital labor bayanihan’: Strategies of influence and survival in the platform economy. Sociologias 23(57): 84–111.

57.

Tandoc

Sagun

Alvarez

(2023) The digitization of harassment: Women journalists’ experiences with online harassment in the Philippines. Journalism Practice 17(6): 1198–1213.

58.

Tiidenberg

Hendry

Abidin

(2021) Tumblr. Cambridge, UK; Medford, MA: Polity

59.

TikTok (n.d.a) Terms of Service. Available at: https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/row/terms-of-service/en (accessed 15 August 2023).

60.

TikTok (n.d.b) Children's Privacy Policy. Available at: https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/global/childrens-privacy-policy/en (accessed 15 August 2023).

61.

@tltjavier (2022) [Twitter] 19 May. Available at: https://x.com/jltjavier/status/1527185384182284288?s=20 (accessed 1 August 2023).

62.

Tuazon

(2022) Internet sensation Sassa Gurl achieves dream of becoming a calendar model. PEP, 14 January. Available at: https://www.pep.ph/lifestyle/lifestyle/163137/sassa-calendar-model-a721-20220114 (accessed 05 June 2023).

63.

Ulla

Macaraeg

Ferrera

(2024) What’s the word? That’s the word!: Linguistic features of Filipino queer language. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11(1): 2322232.

64.

Zhang

(2022) Governing social eating (chibo) influencers: Policies, approach and politics of influencer governance in China. Policy & Internet 14(3): 525–540.

65.

Yang

(2020) The biggest celebrity apologies on social media in 2020. Entertainment Weekly, 10 December. Available at: https://ew.com/celebrity/celebrity-apologies-2020/ (accessed 7 June 2023).

66.

Zeng

Abidin

(2021) ‘#OkBoomer, time to meet the Zoomers’: studying the memefication of intergenerational politics on TikTok. Information, Communication & Society 24(16): 2459–2481.

67.

Zhang

(2021) Infrastructuralization of Tik Tok: Transformation, power relationships, and platformization of video entertainment in China. Media, Culture & Society 43(2): 219–236.

TikTok ‘dogshows’ and the amplification of online incivility among Gen Z influencers in the Philippines

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References