The short-video platform TikTok/Douyin becomes a space not only for individuals to express and articulate their interests, but also for the authorities to negotiate with the public on various ideological boundaries. This article specifically examines a Douyin campaign in which the platform attempts to prescribe a standard of body exposure that falls within the tolerance level of the authorities and, meanwhile, favours users’ interests to gain support. To conceptualize such discursive negotiations and the relevant tactics, we propose the term ‘discursive concession’ to describe the process of compromise by temporarily challenging, obscuring, and rearticulating the discursive boundary, eventually legitimizing the subordinated discourse by aligning it with the dominant ideological logic. By analysing discourses of representative short videos and comments, we identified three tactics of discursive concession: cooptation, hijacking, and normalization. They respectively describe how dominant, subordinated, and middle powers leverage each other to push the discursive boundary forward.
Cambridge Dictionary (2023) Concession. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english-chinese-traditional/concession?q=Concession (accessed 8 March 2023).
7.
CaterinaD (2021) Gramsci in China: Past, present, and future of a still open encounter. Antipode53(5): 1357–1376.
8.
ChenXKayeDBVZengJ (2021) # positiveenergy Douyin: Constructing ‘playful patriotism’ in a Chinese short-video application. Chinese Journal of Communication14(1): 97–117.
9.
ChqLHUHuntL (2013) British Low Culture: From Safari Suits to Sexploitation. London: Routledge.
10.
CrehanK (2016) Gramsci's common sense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
DarvinR (2022) Design, resistance and the performance of identity on TikTok. Discourse, Context & Media46: 100591.
12.
de CerteauM (2014) Reading as poaching. In: BennettA (ed.) Readers and Reading. London: Routledge, pp. 150–163. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844114
13.
DeuzeM (2007) Convergence culture in the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Studies10(2): 243–263.
14.
DobsonAS (2016) Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-representation. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137404206
15.
Du GayPHallSJanesL, et al. (2013) Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman. LA: Sage.
16.
EschmannRGroshekJLiSet al. (2021) Bigger than sports: Identity politics, Colin Kaepernick, and concession making in #BoycottNike. Computers in Human Behavior114: 106583.
17.
FaircloughN (1993) Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
Fu H, Fung AY and Leo-Liu J (2024) Women as Dancing Wanghong on Douyin: Affective Affordances and Gender Performativity. Routledge Handbook of Chinese Gender and Sexuality. Routledge. In press.
19.
GerrardY (2020) Social media content moderation: Six opportunities for feminist intervention. Feminist Media Studies20(5): 748–751.
20.
GramsciA (1980) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 6th edn. London: Wishart Publications.
HallS (2018) Popular culture, politics and history. Cultural Studies32(6): 929–952.
23.
HawleyJP (1980) Antonio Gramsci's Marxism: Class, state and work. Social Problems27(5): 584–600.
24.
IbrahimY (2017) Facebook and the Napalm girl: Reframing the iconic as pornographic. Social Media + Society3(4): 2056305117743140.
25.
JenkinsH (2012) Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge.
26.
JohnsonNACooperRB (2009) Media, affect, concession, and agreement in negotiation: IM versus telephone. Decision Support Systems46(3): 673–684.
27.
KleinhansC (1994) Cultural Appropriation and Subcultural Expression: The Dialectics of Cooptation and Resistance. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Centre for the Humanities.
28.
LaclauEMouffeC (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
29.
LagerkvistJ (2008) Internet ideotainment in the PRC: National responses to cultural globalization. Journal of Contemporary China17(54): 121–140.
30.
LinJde KloetJ (2019) Platformization of the unlikely creative class: Kuaishou and Chinese digital cultural production. Social Media + Society5(4): 1–12.
31.
MaEKW (2000) Rethinking media studies. In: CurranJParkMJ (eds) De-westernizing media studies. London: Routledge, pp. 21–28. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981764
32.
MaYHuY (2021) Business model innovation and experimentation in transforming economies: ByteDance and TikTok. Management and Organization Review17(2): 382–388.
33.
NetEase Technology (2021, 28 June) Wearing a slip dress is forbidden? Douyin attempts censorship rule co-creation meeting to discuss about the standard of content censorship (穿个吊带裙就被下架？抖音试行’规则共创会’讨论内容审核标准). Available at: https://www.163.com/dy/article/GDJ2F1QE00097U7R.html (accessed 3 April 2023).
34.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
35.
OlszanowskiM (2014) Feminist self-imaging and Instagram: Tactics of circumventing censorship. Visual Communication Quarterly21(2): 83–95.
36.
PoellTNieborgDBDuffyBE (2023) Spaces of negotiation: Analyzing platform power in the news industry. Digital Journalism11(8): 1391–1409.
37.
RaslerK (1996) Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review61(1): 132–152.
38.
RitlandR (2018) Visual pleasure from motherhood: Alyssa Milano challenging the male gaze. Media, Culture & Society40(8): 1281–1291.
39.
RogersRA (2006) From cultural exchange to transculturation: A review and reconceptualization of cultural appropriation. Communication Theory16(4): 474–503.
SelznickP (1953) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization, Vol. 3. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1950244
42.
SmithP (2001) Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
TangXZouWHuZet al. (2021) The recreation of gender stereotypes in male cross-dressing performances on Douyin. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media65(5): 660–678.
44.
Tintiangko J, Fung AY and Leo-Liu J (2023) Compelled TikTok creators? The ambivalent affordances of the short video app for Filipino musicians. Media, Culture & Society 45(8): 1600–1615.
45.
Van DijckJ (2009) Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society31(1): 41–58.
46.
WuX (2018) Discursive strategies of resistance on Weibo: A case study of the 2015 Tianjin explosions in China. Discourse, Context & Media26: 64–73.
47.
ZouS (2019) When nationalism meets hip-hop: Aestheticized politics of ideotainment in China. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies16(3): 178–195.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
