This article proposes a mobilities-informed approach to social science research on healthcare and migration. It engages with evidence gathered during the Covid-19 pandemic that suggests that when confronted with a public health emergency, health systems can be responsive to the needs of mobile populations. During the Covid-19 lockdowns, health resources shifted routine services online, spurring an acceleration of telemedicine. The roll-out of these practices intersected with the phenomenon of digital exclusion, making healthcare partly or completely out of reach for those who could not connect. We argue that these efforts could have been more successful if they grew out of a recognition of healthcare's ‘sedentary bias’. National health systems are configured to serve settled populations. They are not designed for people on the move, with uncertain residential and immigration status. Yet this bias can be alleviated when health interventions are rethought from the point of view of the mobile patient.
AdeyPHannamKShellerM, et al. (2021) Pandemic (im)mobilities. Mobilities16(1): 1–19.
2.
AlencarAKondovaKRibbensW (2019) The smartphone as a lifeline: An exploration of refugees’ use of mobile communication technologies during their flight. Media, Culture & Society41(6): 828–844.
3.
BaldassarLWildingR (2020) Migration, aging and digital kinning: The role of distant care support networks in experiences of aging well. The Gerontologist60(2): 313–321.
4.
BalibarE (2002) Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso.
5.
BastickZMallet-GarciaM (2022) Double lockdown: The effects of digital exclusion on undocumented immigrants during the COVID-19 pandemic. New Media & Society24(2): 365–383.
6.
BernadasJMCPiocosCMVilogRB (2019) Communicative processes for health activism: The case of organizations working with Filipina migrants in Japan. International Journal of Human Rights in Medicine12(5): 339–352.
7.
BernocchiP, Bonometi F, Serlini Met al. (2022) Telehealth and telecare: A real-life integrated experience in the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health28(5): 720–727.
8.
BorhadeADeyS (2018) Do migrants have a mortality advantage?The Lancet392(10164): 2517–2518.
9.
BorkertMFisherKEYafiE (2018) The best, the worst, and the hardest to find: How people, mobiles, and social media connect migrants in(to) Europe. Social Media + Society4(1): 1–11.
10.
BotrugnoC (2022) The spread of telemedicine in daily practice. In: IencaMPollicinoOLiguoriL, etal (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Information Technology, Life Sciences and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–112.
11.
BurnsNFollisLFollisK, et al. (2019) Moving target, moving parts: The multiple mobilities of the COVID-19 pandemic. In: LuptonDWillisK (eds) The COVID-19 Crisis: Social Perspectives. London: Routledge, 26–38.
12.
BurnsNMulveyGPiacentiniT, et al. (2022) Refugees, political bounding and the pandemic: material effects and experiences of categorisations amongst refugees in Scotland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies48(17): 4066–4084.
13.
CabalquintoECB (2020) Elastic carework: The cost and contradictions of mobile caregiving in a transnational household. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies34(1): 133–145.
14.
CabalquintoECB (2021) Telecocooning in the age of (im)mobility. Communication, Culture & Critique14(2): 351–355.
15.
CabalquintoECBWood-BradleyG (2020) Migrant platformed subjectivity: Rethinking the mediation of transnational affective economies via digital connectivity services. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(5): 787–802.
16.
CassidyK (2018) Everyday bordering, healthcare and the politics of belonging in contemporary Britain. In: PassiAProkkolaESaarinenJZimmerbauerK (eds) Borderless Worlds for Whom? Ethics, Moralities and Mobilities. New York: Routledge, pp. 78–92.
17.
ChangJE, Lai AY, Gupta Aet al. (2021) Rapid transition to telehealth and the digital divide: Implications for primary care access and equity in a post-COVID era. Milbank Quarterly99(2): 340–368.
18.
De LucaGPonzoMAndrésAR (2013) Health care utilization by immigrants in Italy. International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics13(1): 1–31.
19.
Di NapoliA, Ventura M, Spadea Tet al. (2022) Barriers to accessing primary care and appropriateness of healthcare among immigrants in Italy. Frontiers in Public Health10: 817696.
20.
Doctors of the World (2020) A Rapid Needs Assessment of Excluded People in England During the 2020 COVID Pandemic. Report. London: Doctors of the World.
21.
DüvellF (2012) Transit migration: A blurred and politicised concept. Population Space and Place18(4): 415–427.
22.
EssexRRiazACasalottiSet al. (2022) A decade of the hostile environment and its impact on health. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine115(3): 87–90.
23.
FollisLBurnsN (2020) The disappearing patient: visibility, mobility and infectious disease. In: SchindelEGattiG (eds) Social Disappearance: Explorations between Latin America and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Forum Transregionale Studien, 176–187.
24.
GideonJ (2011) Exploring migrants’ health seeking strategies: The case of Latin American migrants in London. International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care7(4): 197–206.
25.
GolinelliDBoettoECarulloG, Nuzzolese AG, Landini MP and Fantini MP (2020) Adoption of digital technologies in health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(11): E22280.
26.
González-VázquezTPelcastre-VillafuerteBETaboadaA (2016) Surviving the distance: The transnational utilization of traditional medicine among Oaxacan migrants in the US. Journal of Minority Health18(5): 1190–1198.
27.
GraetzVRechelBGrootW, Norredam M and Pavlova M (2017) Utilization of health care services by migrants in Europe: A systematic literature review. British Medical Bulletin121(1): 5–18.
28.
HarrisonHLDaker-WhiteG (2019) Beliefs and challenges held by medical staff about providing emergency care to migrants: An international systematic review and translation of findings to the UK context. BMJ Open9(7): e028748.
29.
InglebyDPetrova-BenedictR (2016) Recommendations on Access to Health Services for Migrants in an Irregular Situation: An Expert Consensus. Brussels: International Organization for Migration (IOM) Regional Office Brussels, Migration Health Division.
30.
KaraH (2015) Creative Methods in the Social Sciences. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
KeesaraSJonasASchulmanK (2020) COVID-19 and health care’s digital revolution. New England Journal of Medicine382(23): e82.
33.
KnightsFCarterJDealAet al. (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on migrants’ access to primary care and implications for vaccine roll-out. British Journal of General Practice71(709): E583–E595.
34.
Lancet Migration Global Statement (2020) Leaving no one behind in the Covid-19 pandemic: A call for urgent global action to include migrants and refugees in the Covid19 response. Available at: https://www.migrationandhealth.org/migration-covid19(accessed 25 April 2022)
35.
LebanoAHamedSBradbyHet al. (2020) Migrants’ and refugees’ health status and healthcare in Europe: A scoping literature review. BMC Public Health20(1): 1039.
36.
Lessard-PhilipsLFuLLindenmeyerA and Phillimore J (2021) Barriers to Wellbeing: Migration and Vulnerability During the Pandemic. London: Doctors of the World.
37.
LeursKPonzanesiS (2018) Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization. Popular Communication16(1): 4–20.
38.
MalkkiL (1992) National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology7(1): 24–44.
39.
MarlerW (2018) Mobile phones and inequality: Findings, trends and future directions. New Media + Society20(9): 3498–3520.
40.
McMullinC (2021) Migrant integration services and coping with the digital divide: Challenges and opportunities of the COVID-19 pandemic. Voluntary Sector Review12(1): 129–136.
MoranC (2022) The ‘connected migrant’: A scoping review. Psychological Science29(2): 14–33.
43.
MurphyMScottLauren JSalisburyCet al. (2021) Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of General Practice71(704): e166–e177.
44.
NeagASupaM (2020) Emotional practices of unaccompanied refugee youth on social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(5): 766–786.
45.
OmboniSPadwalRS, AlessaTet al. (2022) The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: Current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connect Health1: 7–35.
46.
PICUM (Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants) (2020) Non-exhaustive Overview of European Government Measures Impacting Undocumented Migrants Taken in the Context of COVID-19. Brussels: PICUM.
47.
PotterJL (2018) Patients not passports: No borders in the NHS. Justice Power and Resistance2(2): 417–429.
48.
PrestileoTDi LorenzoFCorraoS (2015) Infectious diseases among African irregular migrants in Italy: Just an individual problem?Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention2(5): 45–57.
49.
ProbstU (2023) Health insurance for the good European citizen? Migrant sex workers’ quests for health insurance and the moral economy of health care. Social Science & Medicine319: 115190.
50.
RamsettyAAdamsC (2020) Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(7): 1147–1148.
51.
SchapendonkJvan LiemptISchwartzI and Steel G (2020) Re-routing migration geographies: Migrants, trajectories and mobility regimes. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences116: 211–216.
52.
ShellerM (2018) Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. London: Verso.
53.
SlootjesJ (2021) Healing the Gap: Building Inclusive Public-health and Migrant Integration Systems in Europe. Brussels: Migration Policy Institute Europe.
54.
SoderoS (2020) Vital mobilities. In: BüscherMFreudendal-PedersenMKesselringSKristensenN (eds) Handbook on Methods and Applications for Mobilities Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 172–181.
55.
StanS (2015) Transnational healthcare practices of Romanian migrants in Ireland: Inequalities of access and the privatisation of healthcare services in Europe. Social Science & Medicine124: 346–355.
TaylorBS, Garduño LS, Reyes EVet al. (2011) HIV care for geographically mobile populations. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine78(3): 342–351.
58.
TazzioliMStierlM (2021) ‘We closed the ports to protect refugees’: Hygienic borders and deterrence humanitarianism during Covid-19. International Political Sociology15(4): 539–558.
59.
TiilikainenMKoehnP (2011) Transforming the boundaries of health care: Insights from Somali migrants. Medical Anthropology30(5): 518–544.
60.
Turner A, Morris R, Rakhra Det al. (2022) Unintended consequences of online consultations: A qualitative study in UK primary care. British Journal of Medical Practice 72(715): e128–e137.
61.
ValerianiGVukovicIS, LindegaardTet al. (2020) Addressing healthcare gaps in Sweden during the COVID-19 outbreak: On community outreach and empowering ethnic minority groups in a digitalized context. Healthcare8(4): 445.
62.
Van LoenenT, van den Muijsenbergh M, Hofmeester M et al. (2018) Primary care for refugees and newly arrived migrants in Europe: A qualitative study on health needs, barriers and wishes. European Journal of Public Health28(1): 82–87.
63.
VilogRBTPiocosCM (2021) Undocumented in the time of the pandemic: Exploring legal violence, health care and human rights of irregular Filipino migrants in Italy and the UK. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare14(3): 209–222.
64.
von WeinrichPKongQYunL (2022) Would you Zoom with your doctor? A discrete choice experiment to identify patient preferences for video and in-clinic consultations in German primary care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare: 1–24.
65.
WallMOtis CampbellMJanbeckD (2017) Syrian refugees and information precarity. New Media & Society19(2): 240–254.
66.
WatsonALuptonDMichaelM (2021) The Covid digital home assemblage: Transforming the home into a work space during the crisis. Convergence27(5): 1207–1221.
67.
WhertonJGreenhalghTShawSE (2021) Expanding video consultation services at pace and scale in Scotland during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(11): e31374.
68.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2020). ApartTogether Survey: Preliminary Overview of Refugees and Migrants Self-reported Impact of Covid-19. Geneva: WHO.
69.
WittebornS (2021) Digital placemaking and the datafication of forced migrants. Convergence27(3): 637–648.
70.
WorthingKSetaPOuwehandI, et al. (2022) Reluctance of general practice staff to register patients without documentation: A qualitative study in north east London. British Journal of General Practice73(729): e276–e283.
ZijlstraJVan LiemptI (2017) Smart(phone) travelling: Understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies3: 174–191.
