The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the significance of the “digital divide”; however, its research terminology remains inconsistent, and the intersection of the pandemic with the digital divide has been under-explored. To address these gaps, this paper begins with a conceptual analysis aimed at clarifying three pivotal concepts: digital divide, digital inequality, and digital exclusion. Following this, a scoping review of contemporary literature from January 2020 to December 2022 identifies five key aspects of the digital divide that have become prominent globally during the crisis, revealing how the pandemic has not only exposed but also intensified inequalities within the digital society. Both the conceptual analysis and empirical evidence emphasize the complexity and contextuality of the digital divide, enriching our understanding of its multifaceted challenges. Based on these insights, the paper concludes by calling for a holistic view and analytical strategy that not only seeks to bridge technological gaps but also targets the underlying social structures, thereby promoting digital inclusivity for all.
AbidTZahidGShahidN, et al. (2021) Online teaching experience during the COVID-19 in Pakistan: Pedagogy–technology balance and student engagement. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences14(3): 367–391.
2.
AissaouiN (2022) The digital divide: A literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication71(8/9): 686–708.
3.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 19–32.
4.
AttewellP (2001) Comment: The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education74(3): 252–259.
5.
AzubuikeOBAdegboyeOQuadriH (2021) Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research2: 100022.
6.
BeaunoyerEDupéréSGuittonMJ (2020) COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior111: 106424.
7.
BešićADiedrichAAignerP (2021) Organising labour market integration support for refugees in Austria and Sweden during the Covid-19 pandemic. Comparative Migration Studies9(1): 48.
8.
BlombergMAltschwagerDSeoH, et al. (2021) Digital divide and marginalized women during COVID-19: A study of women recently released from prison. Information Communication & Society24(14): 2113–2132.
9.
BonfadelliH (2002) The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication17(1): 65–84.
10.
Calderón GómezD (2021) The third digital divide and Bourdieu: Bidirectional conversion of economic, cultural, and social capital to (and from) digital capital among young people in Madrid. New Media & Society23(9): 2534–2553.
11.
ChisitaCTChiparaushaBTsabetseV, et al. (2022) Remaking academic library services in Zimbabwe in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Academic Librarianship48(3): 102521.
12.
ChoudhuryAAsanO (2022) Use of technology for health-related tasks among older adults: Trend analysis of pre-&-during COVID. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care11(1): 113–118.
13.
CookTDAppletonHConnerRF, et al. (1975) Sesame Street Revisited. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
CullenR (2001) Addressing the digital divide. Online Information Review25(5): 311–320.
15.
De CaluweCVerdegemPVan DoorenW (2012) The digital divide and/in e-government: A catch-22?Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschappen40(1): 46.
16.
DelavegaEMeimanJMaloneCC, et al. (2022) The two pandemics: The disparate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the K-shaped recovery. Journal of Policy Practice and Research3(1): 36–51.
17.
DeRPandeyNPalA (2020) Impact of digital surge during covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of Information Management55: 102171.
18.
DiMaggioPHargittaiE (2001) From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton Working Paper Series 15. Available at: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/pricpanda/15.htm (accessed 16 March 2023).
19.
DiMaggioPHargittaiECelesteC, et al. (2004) Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In: NeckermanK (ed.) Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.355–400.
20.
DuttonWHRogersEMJunS-H (1987) Diffusion and social impacts of personal computers. Communication Research14(2): 219–250.
21.
EpsteinJL (2020) Partnerships keep children learning during COVID-19. Contexts19(4): 88–90.
22.
EruchaluCNPichardoMSBharadwajM, et al. (2021) The expanding digital divide: Digital health access inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. Journal of Urban Health98(2): 183–186.
23.
Esteban-NavarroMÁGarcía-MadurgaMÁMorte-NadalT, et al. (2020) The rural digital divide in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe—recommendations from a Scoping Review. Informatics7(4): 54.
FroshPGeorgiouM (2022) Covid-19: The cultural constructions of a global crisis. International Journal of Cultural Studies25(3–4): 233–252.
26.
FuchsC (2014) Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.
27.
FuchsCBoersmaKAlbrechtslundA, et al. (eds) (2013) Internet and Surveillance. New York: Routledge.
28.
GandolfiEFerdigREKratcoskiA (2021) A new educational normal an intersectionality-led exploration of education, learning technologies, and diversity during COVID-19. Technology and Society66: 101637.
29.
Garín-MuñozTPérez-AmaralTValarezoÁ (2022) Evolution of the internet gender gaps in Spain and effects of the Covid-19 pandemic. Telecommunications Policy46(8): 102371.
30.
GazianoC (1983) The knowledge gap: An analytical review of media effects. Communication Research10(4): 447–486.
31.
GerliPArakpogunEOElsahnZ, et al. (2021) Beyond contact-tracing: The public value of eHealth application in a pandemic. Government Information Quarterly38(3): 101581.
32.
GoodmanSPressLRuthS, et al. (1994) The global diffusion of the Internet: Patterns and problems. Communications of the ACM37(8): 27–31.
33.
GreenbergBDervinB (1970) Mass communication among the urban poor. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 224–235.
HargittaiE (ed.) (2021) Handbook of Digital Inequality. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
36.
HargittaiEHsiehYP (2013) Digital inequality. In: DuttonWH (ed.) The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.129–150.
37.
HeeksR (2022) Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development28(4): 688–704.
38.
HelsperEJ (2017) The social relativity of digital exclusion: Applying relative deprivation theory to digital inequalities. Communication Theory27(3): 223–242.
39.
HoffmanDLNovakTP (1998) Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science280(5362): 390–391.
40.
KatzmanN (1974) The impact of communication technology: Promises and prospects. Journal of Communication24(4): 47–58.
41.
KołodziejskaM (2022) What can the COVID-19 pandemic tell us about the connection between media and religion? The case of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church in Poland. Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik6(1): 27–41.
42.
KöttlHGallistlVRohnerR, et al. (2021) “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies59: 100971.
43.
KristoficB (2007) Digital inequality. Sociologija i Prostor45(176): 165–181.
44.
LazarsfeldPFKendallPL (1948) Radio Listening in America. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc.
45.
LiF (2022) Disconnected in a pandemic: COVID-19 outcomes and the digital divide in the United States. Health & Place77: 102867.
46.
LitchfieldIShuklaDGreenfieldS (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: A rapid review. BMJ Open11(10): e053440.
47.
LiuJ (2021) Bridging digital divide amidst educational change for socially inclusive learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sage Open11(4): 21582440211060810.
48.
LopezKJTongCWhateA, et al. (2021) “It’s a whole new way of doing things”: The digital divide and leisure as resistance in a time of physical distance. World Leisure Journal63(3): 281–300.
49.
LythreatisSSinghSKEl-KassarA-N (2022) The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change175: 121359.
50.
MacLeanMS (1952) Mass media audiences: City, small city, village and farm. Journalism Quarterly29(3): 271–282.
51.
MariyaKShakeelAShazliT, et al. (2022) Analysing the role of gender and place of residence in acceptability and satisfaction towards e-learning among university students’ during COVID-19 pandemic in India. SN Social Sciences2(10): 233.
52.
Masry-HerzallahAStavisskyY (2021) The attitudes of elementary and middle school students and teachers towards online learning during the corona pandemic outbreak. SN Social Sciences1(3): 71.
53.
MatamandaARNelVLeboto-KhetsiL, et al. (2022) Risk communication in an informal settlement during COVID-19: Case of Dinaweng, Bloemfontein South Africa. Urban Governance2(2): 296–304.
54.
MerisaloMMakkonenT (2022) Bourdieusian e-capital perspective enhancing digital capital discussion in the realm of third level digital divide. Information Technology and People35(8): 231–252.
55.
MubarakFSuomiR (2022) Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. Inquiry59: 00469580221096272.
56.
NataliaG (2022) An inverted digital divide during Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from a panel of EU countries. Telematics and Informatics72: 101856.
57.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) (1995) Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the ‘Have Nots’ in Rural and Urban America. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
58.
NooriSJordanABromageW, et al. (2022) Navigating the digital divide: Providing services to people with serious mental illness in a community setting during COVID-19. SN Social Sciences2(8): 1–11.
59.
PopykAPustułkaP (2023) Educational disadvantages during COVID-19 pandemic faced by migrant schoolchildren in Poland. Journal of international migration and integration24: 487–505.
60.
RafiqMBatoolSHAliAF, et al. (2021) University libraries response to COVID-19 pandemic: A developing country perspective. Journal of Academic Librarianship47(1): 102280.
61.
RagneddaM (2017) The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. London: Routledge.
62.
RagneddaM (2018) Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics35(8): 2366–2375.
63.
RagneddaM (2019) Conceptualising the digital divide. In: MutsvairoBRagneddaM (eds) Mapping the Digital Divide in Africa: A Mediated Analysis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.27–44.
64.
RagneddaMRuiuMLAddeoF (2022) The self-reinforcing effect of digital and social exclusion: The inequality loop. Telematics and Informatics72: 101852.
65.
RajAJunedF (2022) Gendered identities and digital inequalities: An exploration of the lived realities of the transgender community in the Indian digital welfare state. Gender and Development30(3): 531–549.
66.
SamuelsonMCarterRFRuggelsL (1963) Education, available time, and use of mass media. Journalism Quarterly40(4): 491–617.
67.
Sanchez-DiazIAltuntas VuralCHalldórssonÁ (2021) Assessing the inequalities in access to online delivery services and the way COVID-19 pandemic affects marginalization. Transport Policy109: 24–36.
68.
ScheerderAJvan DeursenAJvan DijkJA (2019) Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society21(10): 2099–2118.
69.
SchillerD (1999) Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
70.
SchradieJ (2020) The great equalizer reproduces inequality: How the digital divide is a class power divide. In: EidlinBMcCarthyMA (eds) Rethinking Class and Social Difference. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp.81–101.
71.
SeifertA (2020) The digital exclusion of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work63(6-7): 674–676.
72.
ShekDTL (2021) COVID-19 and quality of life: Twelve reflections. Applied Research in Quality of Life16(1): 1–11.
73.
SixsmithAHorstBRSimeonovD, et al. (2022) Older people’s use of digital technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society42(1-2): 19–24.
74.
TichenorPJDonohueGAOlienCN (1970) Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly34(2): 159–170.
75.
Tirado-MoruetaRRodríguez-MartínAÁlvarez-ArreguiE, et al. (2021) Understanding internet appropriation among older people through institutional supports in Spain. Technology and Society64: 101505.
76.
Van DeursenAHelsperEJ (2015) The third-level digital divide: Who benefits Most from being online? In: RobinsonLCottenSRSchulzJ, et al (eds) Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Distinctions and Inequalities. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd, pp.29–52.
77.
Van DeursenAVan DijkJHelsperE (2014) Investigating outcomes of online engagement. Media@LSE Working Paper Series 28. Available at: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59994/ (accessed 14 March 2023).
78.
VassilakopoulouPHustadE (2023) Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers25: 955–969.
79.
VelicuABarbovschiMRotaruI (2022) Socially isolated and digitally excluded. A qualitative exploratory study of the lives of Roma teenage mothers during the COVID-19 lockdown. Technology and Society68: 101861.
80.
VurayaiS (2024) COVID-19 pandemic and the narrative of the digital divide gap in universities in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Identities22: 760–771.
81.
WongYCFungJYCLawCK, et al. (2009) Tackling the digital divide. British Journal of Social Work39(4): 754–767.
82.
WoodrowNMooreK (2021) The liminal leisure of disadvantaged young people in the UK before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Applied Youth Studies4(5): 475–491.
83.
XieBCharnessNFingermanK, et al. (2020) When going digital becomes a necessity: Ensuring older adults’ needs for information, services, and social inclusion during COVID-19. Journal of Aging & Social Policy32(4-5): 460–470.
84.
YuBNdumuAMonLM, et al. (2018) E-inclusion or digital divide: An integrated model of digital inequality. Journal of Documentation74(3): 552–574.
85.
YuH (2022) Living in the era of codes: A reflection on China’s health code system. BioSocieties19: 1–18.
86.
ZhaoLCaoCLiY, et al. (2022) Determinants of the digital outcome divide in E-learning between rural and urban students: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic based on capital theory. Computers in Human Behavior130: 107177.
