Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

This study investigates language shift, code-switching, and linguistic change in an understudied trilingual Japanese-Korean-Russian speech community on Sakhalin. It elucidates how successive political regimes, demographic transformations, language/dialect structure, and speaker proficiency shape diglossic relations, language choice patterns, and multilingual practices.

Methodology:

Using implicational scales, macro-level analysis visualizes language choice across interlocutors and domains. Micro-level analysis draws on Myers-Scotton’s Matrix Language Frame model and Poplack’s code-switching typology, with apparent-time analysis to identify linguistic innovation and change.

Data and analysis:

Five hours of recordings from 16 second-to-fourth-generation Sakhaliners of Japanese, Korean, and mixed heritage yielded 220 multilingual utterances and 450 code-switching instances, analyzed alongside self-reports on language choice.

Findings:

Macro-level analysis reveals a typical three-generation language shift pattern for Koreans but not Japanese, demonstrating that changes in demographics and institutional support can produce abrupt language shifts. Diglossia exhibits initial structural stability but eventual instability: high languages are replaced by successive colonial powers, while low languages persist through the third generation before facilitating language shift. Micro-level analysis confirms the applicability of both Myers-Scotton’s and Poplack’s frameworks across typologically similar (Japanese/Korean) and dissimilar (Russian/Japanese, Russian/Korean) language pairs. Code-switching functions—quotational authenticity effects, audience inclusion, compensatory/emphatic purposes, and identity marking—enhance communicative efficiency. Apparent-time analysis identifies three age-cohort-specific speaker innovations (analogical leveling, light verb formations, novel negation constructions) and one change in progress: the productive Russian tag question construction, appearing across age cohorts. These patterns demonstrate a systematic preference for regularity and invariant forms in language change.

Originality and significance:

Providing rare systematic linguistic documentation of a historically stratified language contact zone, the findings advance theoretical understandings of diglossia, language shift, code-switching, and contact-induced innovation and change. They highlight preference for regularity, predictability, and communicative efficiency and underscore the importance of considering language/dialect structure, speaker proficiency, and sociohistorical context in multilingual analysis.

Keywords

Analogical leveling code-switching diaspora Japanese diaspora Korean diglossia family language policy implicational scale language shift speaker innovation heritage language maintenance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Academy of Korean Studies. (2021). Sakhalin Korean society. https://encykorea.aks.ac.kr/Article/E0026095

Anderson

(2015). Substrate-influenced Japanese and code-switching. In Heinrich

Miyara

Shimoji

(Eds.), Handbook of the Ryukyuan languages: History, structure, and use (pp. 481–509). De Gruyter Mouton.

Asahi

(2009). Linguistic features of a Japanese variety in a Japanese diaspora. In Tsumagari

(Ed.), Sakhalin symposium (pp. 27–40). Hokkaido University.

Bailey

Wikle

Tillery

Sand

(1991). The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change, 3(3), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000569

Bickerton

(1975). Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge University Press.

Callahan

(2002). The Matrix Language Frame model and Spanish/English codeswitching in fiction. Language & Communication, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00018-0

Clyne

(2003). Dynamics of language contact. Cambridge University Press.

Eckert

(1980). Diglossia: Separate and unequal. Linguistics, 18, 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.11-12.1053

Fajst

Matsumoto

(2020). Japanese and Korean loanwords in a Far East Russian variety: Human mobility and language contact in Sakhalin. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics, 14, 155–195. https://doi.org/10108/94522

10.

Ferguson

(1959). Diglossia. Word, 15(2), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702

11.

Fishman

J. A.

(1964). Language maintenance and language shift as a field of inquiry: A definition of the field and suggestions for its further development. Linguistics, 2(9), 32–70.

12.

Gal

(1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. Academic Press.

13.

Gumperz

J. J.

(1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.

14.

Holmes

(1993). Women’s role in language maintenance and shift. Working Papers in Language, Gender, and Sexism, 3, 5–24.

15.

Holmes

Roberts

Vertvaki

‘Aipolo’

(1993). Language maintenance and shift in three New Zealand speech communities. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1–24.

16.

Hsiao

C.-H.

(2024). A corpus investigation of the typology of code-switching between closely related languages: Data from Mandarin-Taiwanese code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 29(6), 1619–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241299001

17.

Karafutochō [Karafuto Bureau]. (1943). Shōwa 16 nen Karafutochō Tōkeisho [Report on 1941 Census in Karafuto].

18.

Kim

(2001). Zainici korian no gengo sessyoku ni kansuru syakai gengogakuteki kenkyū [Sociolinguistic study of Korean language contact] [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Osaka University, Suita, Japan.

19.

Kuzin

(1998). Enkaishū/Saharin chikai mukashi no hanashi: Honrōsareta chōsenjin no rekishi [Recent history of Primor’ye region and Sakhalin: History of Sakhalin Koreans] ( Oka

Tanaka

, Trans.). Gaifūsha.

20.

Labov

(1996). When intuitions fail. In McNair

Singer

Dolbrin

Aucon

(Eds.), Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics (Vol. 32, pp. 77–106). Chicago Linguistic Society.

21.

(1994). Three generations, two languages, one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Multilingual Matters.

22.

MacSwan

(2005). Codeswitching and generative grammar: A critique of the MLF model and some remarks on “modified minimalism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904002068

23.

Mamontova

(2016). The sociolinguistic landscape of the island of Sakhalin. Studia Orientalia, 117, 227–247.

24.

Matsumoto

(2001). Multilingualism in Palau: Language contact with Japanese and English. In McAuley

T. E.

(Ed.), Language change in East Asia (pp. 84–142). Routledge.

25.

Matsumoto

(2010). The role of social networks in the post-colonial multilingual island of Palau: Mechanisms of language maintenance and shift. Multilingua, 29(2), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2010.006

26.

Matsumoto

(2020). A restudy of postcolonial Palau after two decades: Changing views on multilingualism in the Pacific. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 30(1–2), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.00044.mat

27.

Matsumoto

Britain

(2003). Investigating the sociolinguistic gender paradox in a multilingual community: A case study from the Republic of Palau. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070020201

28.

Matsumoto

Takada

Okumura

Yoshida

(2023). The genesis and evolution of a Japanese colonial koiné: Apparent-time evidence from Sakhalin in the Far East of Russia. Studies in Dialect, 9, 53–82.

29.

Matsumoto

Takada

Yoshida

Okumura

(2024). Contact-induced language variation in Sakhalin Japanese: Phonetic transfer from Korean and Russian to a Japanese colonial koiné. Studies in Dialect, 10, 75–201.

30.

Matsumoto

Tokumasu

(2022). The maintenance of Japanese as a heritage language in Mexico: Evidence from Japanese pre-war migrants and newcomers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 273, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-0008

31.

Milroy

(1992). Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Blackwell.

32.

Muysken

(2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge University Press.

33.

Myers-Scotton

(1993). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford University Press.

34.

Nakayama

(2015). Co-existence from the base of society of Sakhalin Koreans: Karafuto, Sakhalin and South Korea. Kyōkai Kenkyū, 5, 1–27.

35.

Nishimura

(1997). Japanese/English code-switching: Syntax and pragmatics. Peter Lang.

36.

Paichadze

(2023). Identity, language and education of Sakhalin Japanese and Koreans: Continual diaspora. Springer.

37.

Poplack

(1980). “Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL”: Toward a typology of code-switching. Linguistics, 18(7–8), 581–618. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1980.18.7-8.581

38.

Russian Census. (2010). Itogi vserossijskoj perepisi naseleniya 2010 goda v otnoshenii demograficheskih i social’no-ekonomicheskih harakteristik otdel’nyh nacional’nostej [Summary of Russian Census year 2010 in regards to demographic and socio-economical features of separate nationalities]. https://web.archive.org/web/20200806043744/

39.

Sakurama-Nakamura

(2024). Beyond bilingualism: A discourse analysis of Uzbek-Russian code-switching in contemporary Uzbekistan. Turkophone, 11(3), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.55246/turkophone.1510270

40.

Shiokawa

(1999). The history of Soviet language policy reconsidered. Slavic Studies, 46, 155–190.

41.

Spolsky

(2012). Family language policy: The critical domain. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.638072

42.

Taqavi

Rezaei

(2019). Language choice and identity construction of Azerbaijani bilinguals in family and friendship domains. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(4), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1699564

43.

Thomason

S. G.

Kaufman

(1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.

44.

Uwano

(1991). Oninsōran [Comprehensive phonology]. In Tokugawa

(Ed.), Nihon hōgen daijiten [Dictionary of Japanese dialects] (pp. i–77). Shōgakkan.

45.

Yoshida

Matsumoto

(2022). A comparative sociolinguistic perspective on variation in prevocalic /j/ and /w/ in diaspora Korean: Second-generation Korean Japanese and Korean Sakhaliners. Journal of Atomi University Faculty of Literature, 57, 145–168.

Language shift,code-switching,and linguistic change in a contested borderland: A Japanese-Korean-Russian multilingual community in Sakhalin

Abstract

Objectives:

Methodology:

Data and analysis:

Findings:

Originality and significance:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References