This research investigates the heritage language (HL) as a core value of first-generation Yorùbá English bilingual immigrants in the United States and explicates HL maintenance practices among them.
Methodology:
It uses observation and semi-structured interviews with first-generation Yorùbá–English bilingual immigrants residing in New York, Texas and Maryland.
Data and analysis:
Transcripts from the interviews and field notes from the observation were analysed and coded using Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) and some features of the Interlinear Morpheme Glossing (IMG) rules which are conventions useful for transliterations and translations.
Findings:
The heritage language is the distinctive identity of first-generation Yorùbá–English bilingual immigrants in the United States. Hence, they adopt maintenance strategies similar to those of other immigrants identified in previous studies (home language, language of familiarity, language as code and language for admonition) and devise ingenious strategies to ensure maintenance including language for setting intergroup boundaries, language for maintaining connectedness and language for naming realities.
Originality:
Previous studies have examined HL maintenance among Asian, Hispanic and European immigrants who have HLs with high numeric strength, but this study examines immigrants of African descent and an HL with low numeric strength. It also presents unobserved HL maintenance strategies which are peculiar to first-generation Yorùbá–English bilingual immigrants in the United States.
Implications:
Despite English monism, immigrants/ethnic minorities can go beyond common HL maintenance strategies and create unique ones that will ensure the continued use of their languages. The ability to do this advances a positive ethnic identity, guarantees an improved lifespan for HLs in host communities and reduces instances of identity crisis among immigrants.
BabaeeN. (2014). Heritage language maintenance and loss in an Iranian community in Canada: Successes and challenges [Doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba]. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/handle/1993/23502
2.
BelangerE.VerkuytenM. (2010). Hyphenated identities and acculturation: Second Generation Chinese of Canada and The Netherlands. Identity, 10(3), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2010.495906
3.
BennettJ. E. (1992). Language maintenance in the second generation: The Dutch in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 53–70.
4.
Ben-RafaelM. (2001). Codeswitching in the language of immigrants: The case of Franbreu. In JacobsonR. (Ed.), Codeswitching worldwide II (pp. 251–308). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808742.251
5.
Bezcioglu-GoktolgaI.YagmurK. (2022). Intergenerational differences in family language policy of Turkish families in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43, 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2036746
6.
BosireM. (2006). Immigrant Identity: Code switching among Kenyans in Upstate New York. In MuganeJ. M.HutchisonJ. P.WormanD. A. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 35th annual conference on African linguistics (pp. 44–52). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
BrownC. L. (2011). Maintaining heritage language: Perspectives of Korean parents. Multicultural Education, 19(1), 31–37.
9.
CarreiraM.KaganO. (2018). Heritage language education: A proposal for the next 50 years. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12331
10.
ChatzidakiA.MattheoudakisM.MaligkoudiC. (2021). Albanian immigrant parents supporting community language maintenance: The ‘hows’ and ‘whys’. In MattheoudakisM.GrivaE.MoumtziM. (Eds.), Migration and language education in Southern Europe: Practices and challenges (pp. 16–36). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
11.
ChoG.KrashenS. (1998). The negative consequences of heritage language loss and why we should care. In KrashenS.TseL.McQuillanJ. (Eds.), Heritage language development (pp. 31–39). Language Education Associates.
12.
ClyneM. (1982). Multilingual Australia. River Seine Publications.
13.
ClyneM. (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge University Press.
14.
CohenJ.WickensC. M. (2015). Speaking English and the loss of heritage language. TESL-EJ, 18(4), 1–18.
15.
CumminsJ. (1991). Introduction. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 47(4), 601–605.
16.
Et-BozkurtT.YağmurK. (2022). Family language policy among second- and third-generation Turkish parents in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43, 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2044832
17.
FalolaT. (2013). The African diaspora: Slavery, modernity, and globalization (Vol. 1092, No. 5228). University Rochester Press.
18.
FishmanJ. (1964). Language maintenance and language shift as a field of inquiry. A definition of the field and suggestions for its further development. Linguistics –An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 9, 32–70.
19.
FishmanJ. (1970). Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Newbury House.
20.
FishmanJ. (1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Newbury House.
21.
FishmanJ. (2013). Language maintenance, language shift, and reversing language shift. In BhatiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 466–494). Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
GaudetS.ClémentR. (2009). Forging an identity as a linguistic minority: Intra- and inter- group aspects of language, communication and identity. International Journal of Intercultural Research, 33(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.08.003
23.
HabtoorH. A. (2012). Language maintenance and language shift among second-generation Tigrinya-speaking Eritrean immigrants in Saudi Arabia. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 945–955.
HuntJ.DavisS. (2020). Social and historical factors contributing to language shift among German heritage-language migrants in Australia: An overview. Universität Bern. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.100.6025
26.
HurE.OteroJ. C.LeeE. (2021). Attitudes and expectations towards heritage language instruction: Evidence from Korean and Spanish in the US. Languages, 6(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6010014
27.
JagodicD. (2011). Between language maintenance and language shift: The Slovenian community in Italy today and tomorrow. Eesti Ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri / Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, 2(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2011.2.1.13
28.
JiaG. (2008). Heritage language development, maintenance, and attrition among recent Chinese immigrants in New York City. In HeA. W.XiaoY. (Eds.), Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry (Vol. 2, pp. 189–203). University of Hawaii Press.
29.
KasarlaL. (2021). The value and use of the Telugu language in young adults of Telugu-speaking backgrounds in New Zealand [Master’s Thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/14688
30.
KennedyS. (2015). Selective multiculturalism? Symbols of ethnic identity and core values theory. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 249–259.
31.
KlossH. (1966). German-American language maintenance efforts. In FishmanJ. A. (Ed.), Language loyalty in the United States (pp. 206–252). Mouton.
32.
KupolatiO. O. (2021). Transnational language survival: Heritage language use and maintenance among first-generation Yorùbá-English Nigerian immigrants in diaspora. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1968878
33.
LabovW. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1(1), 97–120.
34.
LaoR. S.LeeJ. S. (2009). Heritage language maintenance and use among 1.5 generation Khmer College students. Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement, 4, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2153-8999.1094
35.
LeeG. L.GuptaA. (2020). Raising children to speak their heritage language in the USA: Roles of Korean parents. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 521–531.
36.
LeeJ. S. (2006). Exploring the relationship between electronic literacy and heritage language maintenance. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 93–113.
37.
LisingL. (2022). ‘I want her to be able to think in English’: Challenges to heritage language maintenance in a monolingual society. Multilingua, 41, 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2021-0106
38.
LittleS. (2020). Whose heritage? What inheritance?: Conceptualising family language identities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1348463
39.
MartinP. (2007). Multilingualism of new minorities (in migratory contexts). In AuerP.WeiL. (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 493–508). Mouton de Gruyter.
40.
MatsumotoK.TokumasuN. (2022). The maintenance of Japanese as a heritage language in Mexico: Evidence from Japanese pre-war migrants and newcomers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 273, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-0008
41.
Migration Policy Institute. (2015). The Nigerian Diaspora in the United States. RAD Diaspora Profile. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjq1PGBpu7OAhWHF8AKHWmpDcMQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.migrationpolicy.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fpublications%2FRAD-Nigeria.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEi1DbfOmYv-D7_H8u0fVwNwd9MKg&bvm=bv.131286987,d.ZGg
42.
MilroyJ.MilroyL. (1999). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation (3rd ed.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
MorganL.PeterM. G. (2014). Affordances for home language maintenance created by multimodal web 2.0 and mobile technologies. In MorganL.TsolakidisC. (Eds.), ICICTE 2014 Proceedings (pp. 175–184).
Myers-ScottonC. (1998). A theoretical introduction to the markedness model. In Myers-ScottonC. (Ed.), Codes and consequences. Choosing linguistic varieties (pp. 18–38). Oxford University Press.
47.
NemotoH. (2011). Smolicz’s theory of core values and language maintenance and shift in Dutch immigrants in Australia. Studies of Language and Culture, 15, 111–126.
48.
NguyenA. (2022). Space and time in Vietnamese heritage language maintenance. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43, 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1744614
49.
NguyenJ.BrownB. B. (2010). Making meanings, meaning identity: Among adolescent perceptions and use of language and style as identity symbols. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 849–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00666.x
50.
OgbaaK. (2003). The Nigerian Americans. Greenwood Press.
51.
OhJ. S.FuligniA. J. (2007). The role of heritage language development in the adjustment of adolescents from immigrant backgrounds. California Center for Population Research.
52.
OrtegaL. (2020). The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning, 70, 15–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12347
53.
PadillaA. (1999). Psychology. In FishmanJ.A. (Ed.), Handbook of language and ethnic identity (pp. 109–121). Oxford University Press.
54.
ParkM. Y. (2022). 1.5-generation Korean New Zealanders’ perceptions of heritage language maintenance, bilingualism, and identity. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.21091.par
55.
PauwelsA. (1985). The role of mixed marriage in language shift in the Dutch communities. In ClyneM. (Ed.), Australia, meeting place of languages (pp. 39–55). Pacific Linguistics.
56.
PauwelsA. (2018). Language shift and maintenance (Key topics in sociolinguistics). Cambridge University Press.
57.
ReyesA. (2005). Appropriation of African American slang by Asian American youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 94(4), 509–532.
58.
RomanowskiP. (2021). A deliberate language policy or a perceived lack of agency: Heritage language maintenance in the Polish community in Melbourne. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25, 1214–1234. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211000850
59.
RumbautR.MasseyD.BeanF. (2006). Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in southern California. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 447–460.
60.
SmoliczJ. J. (1980). Language as a core value of culture. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1–13.
61.
SmoliczJ. J. (1981). Core values and cultural identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 4, 78–90.
62.
SmoliczJ. J. (1991). Language core values in a multicultural setting: An Australian experience. International Review of Education, 37(1), 33–52.
63.
SmoliczJ. J. (1999). J J Smolicz on Education and Culture (Se-combeM. J.ZajdaJ. I. Eds.). James Nicholas Publishers.
64.
StavansA.AshkenaziM. (2022). Heritage language maintenance and management across three generations: The case of Spanish-speakers in Israel. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25, 963–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1731416
65.
StewartJ. (2010). Mosty zamiast murów: Podręcznik komunikacji interpersonalnej (J. Suchecki, przeł.). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
66.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. (2001). Children of immigration. Harvard University Press.
67.
TamakiE. (2011). Transnational home engagement among Latino and Asian Americans: Resources and motivation. International Migration Review, 45(1), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00842.x
68.
ToppelbergC. O.CollinsB. A. (2010). Language, culture, and adaptation in immigrant children. Children and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 19(4), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2010.07.003
69.
TorshH. (2022). ‘Maybe if you talk to her about it’: Intensive mothering expectations and heritage language maintenance. Multilingua, 41, 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2021-0105
70.
TramutoliL. (2021). The code-mixing of the Senegalese migrants in Italy. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25, 1235–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211008243
71.
TsunodaT. (2001). Language endangerment. In SmelserN. J.BaltesP. B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the social and behavioral science (pp. 8349–8353). Elsevier.
UnganeT. (2014). First language loss; why should we care?Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 351–355.
74.
VeetilR.BinuP.KarthikeyanJ. (2020). Language maintenance and language shift among Keralites in Oman. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.21
75.
XiaQ. (2016). Heritage language maintenance and biliteracy development of immigrants’ children: A study of Chinese immigrants’ family language policy and biliteracy practices [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Digital Repository of the University of Maryland.
76.
XiangQ. (2021). Mandarin Chinese Heritage Language Maintenance among Mandarin-English Bi/multilingual Children in Saskatchewan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Saskatchewan.
ZhangD.Slaughter-DefoeD. T. (2009). Language attitudes and heritage language maintenance among Chinese immigrant families in the USA. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 22(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310902935940
79.
ZouC. (2022). Inter-generational language shift and maintenance: Language practice observed in Guangzhou Hakka families. Asian Ethnicity, 23, 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2020.1762164
