Unpacking family language policy through autoethnography: Insights from a transnational Arabic-speaking family in the United States

Abstract

Aims and objectives:

Adopting an autoethnography research framework, this study draws upon insider insights into family life to investigate the language policy of Arabic-speaking Saudi families in the United States. This approach contributes to family language policy (FLP) scholarship. Leveraging the well-established tradition of autoethnography in sociolinguistic studies, the study examines language socialization within a transnational family and the resulting changes in their FLP.

Methodology:

This study adopted Spolsky’s framework of language policy, which consists of ideology, management, and planning. Due to the amount and variation of data, analytical induction was used because it identifies recurring patterns and develops initial insights by examining similarities between phenomena. This method also offers analytical lenses for studying personal experiences and social interactions.

Data collection and analysis:

The data presented in this research were obtained from a larger corpus set obtained during a primary longitudinal study that examined language socialization processes within an Arabic Muslim family temporarily residing in a Western context for a period of 3 years. However, for the purpose of this autoethnographic study, the data analysis was limited to a 2-year period because this analytical method examines broad categories of understanding and then creates sub-categories. Fieldnotes, journals, and recordings were logged and coded to find important patterns.

Findings:

This study shows autoethnography as a useful approach to greater access to an Arabic-speaking Muslim family living in the United States. It also revealed aspects related to internal conflict and the different views parents can have about raising a bilingual child. The role of contextual factors in impacting FLP is also explained. By considering the broader social and cultural influences on language policy, the study showcased the complex interplay between macro-level factors and micro-level family dynamics.

Originality:

This study is the one of the rare studies that highlights the autoethnographic approach to FLP with relation to Arabophone Muslim families living in the United States. Also, the study demonstrates the value of the autoethnographic approach to FLP, as it helps to explore insider perspectives to understand the dynamic nature of FLP, the contextual factors influencing it, and how families construct meaning through their language use.

Significance:

This study lays the groundwork for future sociolinguists interested in FLP research to delve deeper into family language dynamics and explore how children navigate their parents’ language policies through the use of autoethnography approaches.

Keywords

Autoethnography family language policy multilingualism transnationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alasmari

(2023). Religious identity construction in transnational family talks: An autoethnographic study. Children, 10(2), 277.

Bezcioglu-Göktolga

Yagmur

(2018). The impact of Dutch teachers on family language policy of Turkish immigrant parents. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 31(3), 220–234.

Caldas

(2012). Language policy in the family. In Spolsky

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy (pp. 351–373). Cambridge University Press.

Canagarajah

A. S.

(2008). Language shift and the family: Questions from the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(2), 143–176.

Canagarajah

A. S.

(2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279.

Chang

(2007). Autoethnography: Raising cultural consciousness of self and others. Studies in Educational Ethnography, 12, 207–221.

Cruz-Ferreira

(2006). Three is a crowd? Acquiring Portuguese in a trilingual environment. Multilingual Matters.

Curdt-Christiansen

X. L.

(2013). Negotiating family language policy: Doing homework. In Schwartz

Verschik

(Eds.), Successful family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction (pp. 277–295). Springer Netherlands.

Curdt-Christiansen

X. L.

(2016). Conflicting language ideologies and contradictory language practices in Singaporean multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(7), 694–709.

10.

Duff

P. A.

(2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 233–255.

11.

Ellis

Adams

T. E.

Bochner

A. P.

(2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095

12.

Fogle

L. W.

(2012). Second language socialization and learner agency: Adoptive family talk. Multilingual Matters.

13.

Fogle

L. W.

(2013). Parental ethnotheories and family language policy in transnational adoptive families. Language Policy, 12(1), 83–102.

14.

Fogle

L. W.

King

K. A.

(2013). Child agency and language policy in transnational families. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 19, 2–25.

15.

Fogle

L. W.

King

K. A.

(2017). Bi-and multilingual family language socialization. In Duff

P. A.

May

(Eds.), Language Socialization (pp. 1–17). Springer.

16.

Fries

(1998). Different phases: A personal case study in language adjustment and children’s bilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 133(1), 129–142.

17.

Gafaranga

(2010). Medium request: Talking language shift into being. Language in Society, 39(2), 241–270.

18.

Garrett

P. B.

(2008). Researching language socialization. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 10, 189–201.

19.

Katz

(2001). Analytic induction. In Smelser

N. J.

Baltes

P. B.

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 480–484). Elsevier.

20.

Kaveh

Y. M.

(2018). Family language policy and maintenance of Persian: The stories of Iranian immigrant families in the northeast, USA. Language Policy, 17(4), 443–477.

21.

Kaveh

Y. M.

Sandoval

(2020). “No! I’m going to school, I need to speak English!” Who makes family language policies? Bilingual Research Journal, 43(4), 362–383.

22.

Keles

(2022). Autoethnography as a recent methodology in applied linguistics: A methodological review. The Qualitative Report, 27(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5131

23.

Kennedy

K. D.

Romo

H. D.

(2013). “All colors and hues”: An autoethnography of a multiethnic family’s strategies for bilingualism and multiculturalism. Family Relations, 62(1), 109–124.

24.

Kheirkhah

Cekaite

(2015). Language maintenance in a multilingual family: Informal heritage language lessons in parent–child interactions. Multilingua, 34(3), 319–346.

25.

Kheirkhah

Cekaite

(2018). Siblings as language socialization agents in bilingual families. International Multilingual Research Journal, 12(4), 255–272.

26.

King

Lanza

(2017). Ideology, agency, and imagination in multilingual families: An introduction. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(3), 717–723.

27.

King

K. A.

Fogle

L. W.

(2013). Family language policy and bilingual parenting. Language Teaching, 46(2), 172–194.

28.

King

K. A.

Fogle

Logan–Terry

(2008). Family language policy. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(5), 907–922.

29.

Kopeliovich

(2013). Happylingual: A family project for enhancing and balancing multilingual development. In Schwartz

Verschik

(Eds.), Successful family language policy (pp. 249–275). Springer.

30.

Lanza

(2021). The family as a space: Multilingual repertoires, language practices and lived experiences. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(8), 763–771.

31.

Little

(2023). “Half of who you are”: Parent and child reflections on the emotional experiences of reversing familial language shift. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221125705

32.

Little

(2022). An un/familiar space: Children and parents as collaborators in autoethnographic family research. Qualitative Research, 22(4), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999018

33.

Lomeu Gomes

. (2022). “Du er verdens beste papa”: Affect in parent–child multilingual interactions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25, 3758–3772. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2078159

34.

Lomeu Gomes

Lanza

. (2023). Southern approaches to family multilingualism. In Makoni

Kaiper-Marquez

Mokwena

(Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and the global South/s (pp. 285–297). Routledge.

35.

Mirvahedi

S. H.

Hosseini

(2023). Family language policy in retrospect: Narratives of success and failure in an Indian-Iranian transnational family. Language Policy, 22, 179–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-023-09649-4

36.

Moore

L. C.

(2006). Learning by heart in Qur’anic and public schools in northern Cameroon. Social Analysis, 50(3), 109–126.

37.

Ochs

Schieffelin

B. B.

Duranti

(2012). The handbook of language socialization. Wiley Blackwell.

38.

Ochs

Schieffelin

(2001). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 2001, 263–301.

39.

Purkarthofer

(2019). Building expectations: Imagining family language policy and heteroglossic social spaces. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(3), 724–739.

40.

Savin-Baden

Major

C. H.

(2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.

41.

Schwartz

Verschik

(2013). Achieving success in family language policy: Parents, children and educators in interaction. In Schwartz

Verschik

(Eds.), Successful family language policy (pp. 1–20). Springer.

42.

Selleck

(2023). The gendered migrant experience: A study of family language policy (FLP) amongst mothers and daughters in the Somali community, Bristol. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(2), 201–220.

43.

Sevinç

Mirvahedi

S. H.

(2023). Emotions and multilingualism in family language policy: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bilingualism, 27, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221131762

44.

Seloni

Sarfati

(2013). (Trans)national language ideologies and family language practices: A life history inquiry of Judeo-Spanish in Turkey. Language Policy, 12(1), 7–26.

45.

Smagulova

(2017). Ideologies of language revival: Kazakh as school talk. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 331–356.

46.

Smith-Christmas

(2016a). Family language policy: Maintaining an endangered language in the home. Routledge.

47.

Smith-Christmas

(2016b). Family language policy: New directions. In Macalister

Hadi Mirvahedi

(Eds.), Family language policies in a multilingual world (pp. 23–39). Routledge.

48.

Spolsky

(Ed.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of language policy. Cambridge University Press.

49.

Takei

Burdelski

(2018). Shifting of “expert” and “novice” roles between/within two languages: Language socialization, identity, and epistemics in family dinnertime conversations. Multilingua, 37(1), 83–117.

50.

Tannen

Kendall

Gordon

(2007). Power maneuvers and connection maneuvers in family interaction. In Tannen

Kendall

Gordon

(Eds.), Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families (pp. 27–48). Oxford University Press.

51.

Wang

Yang

(2022). Socializing strategies, family language policies, and practices: An autoethnographic study of a transcultural family in southwest China. In Gube

Gao

Bhowmik

(Eds.), Identities, practices and education of evolving multicultural families in Asia-Pacific (pp. 15–30). Routledge.

52.

Wei

(Ed.). (2015). Multilingualism in the Chinese diaspora worldwide: Transnational connections and local social realities. Routledge.

53.

Wright

L. F.

Higgins

(Eds.). (2022). Diversifying family language policy. Bloomsbury Academic.

54.

Zhang

(2012). Co-ethnic network, social class, and heritage language maintenance among Chinese immigrant families. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 11(3), 200–223.

55.

Zhang

Guo

(2018). Becoming transnational: Exploring multiple identities of students in a Mandarin–English bilingual programme in Canada. In Work, Learning and Transnational Migration (pp. 77–96). Routledge.