The current paper utilizes corpus data to examine variation and potential language contact effects regarding pronominal subject placement among first-generation immigrants in Atlanta, with particular attention paid to the individual speaker. The research questions that guide the study are the following: What linguistic and social predictors govern subject placement in Mexican Spanish spoken in Roswell, GA? What role, if any, does English contact play in the overall preverbal rates and/or constraints that govern subject placement? Do the data show any substantial individual differences with regard to rates of subject placement? If so, how might the inclusion versus exclusion of these speakers influence the overall interpretation of the results?
Design and data:
This study employs a variationist sociolinguistic framework, and the speakers comprise 20 first-generation Mexican immigrants living in Georgia.
Analysis:
Descriptive statistics are employed for purposes of overall as well as individual usage rates of postverbal subjects. In addition, linguistic (e.g., person/number, priming) and social predictors (e.g., sex, English proficiency, preferred media language) were incorporated into logistic regression analyses using Rbrul.
Findings:
Pronominal subject placement is most strongly influenced by person/number. Third-person singular pronouns favor postverbals while other pronouns favor preverbal position. Regarding social predictors, both sex and preferred media language appeared to play significant roles in the initial analysis; however, upon considering outlier speaker effects, the apparent effect of sex disappeared. The media language effect shows that those with a preference for English media favor preverbal subjects, suggesting a potential language contact effect.
Originality and implications:
The current study is the first to analyze this phenomenon in southeastern U.S. Spanish. The findings have implications for the study of language contact and change, demonstrating the importance of considering how individual speakers could misrepresent the overall data, interpretations of results, and conclusions in sociolinguistic studies of bilingualism.
AndroutsopoulosJ. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In AndroutsopoulosJ. (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3–48). De Gruyter.
2.
Barrera-TobónC.Raña-RissoR. (2016). A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of contact-induced changes in subject placement in the Spanish of New York City bilinguals. In SessaregoS.Tejedo-HerreroF. (Eds.), Spanish language and sociolinguistic analysis (pp. 323–342). John Benjamin.
3.
Barrera-TobónC.Raña-RissoR. (2020). Pro-drop to non-pro-drop: Question word order in New York City Caribbean Spanish bilinguals. In AlvordS. M.ThompsonG. L. (Eds.), Spanish in the United States: Attitudes and Variation (pp. 77–94). Routledge.
4.
BeneventoN. M.DietrichJ. A. (2014). I think, therefore digo yo: Variable position of the 1sg subject pronoun in New Mexican Spanish-English code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 407–422.
5.
BentivoglioP. (2003). Orden de palabras en español: un análisis sintáctico-semántico-pragmático del sujeto [Word order in Spanish: A syntactic-semantic-pragmatic analysis of the subject]. Lexis, 1/2, 235–260.
6.
BrownE. L.RivasJ. (2011). Subject-verb word order in Spanish interrogatives: A quantitative analysis of Puerto Rican Spanish. Spanish in Context, 8(1), 23–49.
7.
ChambersJ. K. (1998). TV makes people sound the same. In BauerL.TrudgillP. (Eds.), Language myths (pp. 123–131). Penguin.
8.
DiskinC. (2017). The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker “like” by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics, 120, 144–157.
9.
ErkerD.Ho-FernándezE.OtheguyR.ShinN. (2017). Continuity and change in Spanish among Cubans in New York: A study of subject placement with finite verbs. In CuzaA. (Ed.), Cuban Spanish dialectology: Variation, contact, and change (pp. 63–82). Georgetown University Press.
10.
GormanK. (2009, October22–25). Random-effect modeling of sociolinguistic stratification [Paper presentation]. New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 38, University of Ottawa, Canada.
11.
JohnsonD. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 359–383.
12.
KerswillP. (2013). Contact and new varieties. In HickeyR. (Ed.), Handbook of language contact (pp. 230–251). Blackwell.
13.
KingR. E. (2000). The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: A Prince Edward Island French case study (Vol.209). John Benjamins.
14.
LabovW. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Vol. 2: Social factors. Blackwell.
15.
LapidusN.OtheguyR. (2005). Overt nonspecific ellos in Spanish in New York. Spanish in Context, 2, 157–174.
16.
LastraY.Martín ButragueñoP. (2015). Subject pronoun expression in oral Mexican Spanish. In CarvalhoA. M.OrozcoR.Lapidus ShinN. (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Georgetown University Press.
LimerickP. P. (2017). Language contact in the US Southeast: The case of Spanish subject expression in an emerging bilingual community in Georgia. Spanish in Context, 14(1), 53–77.
19.
LimerickP. P. (2019). The discursive distribution of subject pronouns in Spanish spoken in Georgia: A weakening of pragmatic constraints?Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 12(1), 97–126.
MayoralR. H. (2014). Subject position in Spanish. A study of factor interactions with prototypical verbs. Verba, 72, 111–136.
22.
MichnowiczJ. (2015). Subject pronoun expression in contact with Maya in Yucatan Spanish. In CarvalhoA. M.OrozcoR.ShinN. L. (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. 101–119). Georgetown University Press.
23.
MichnowiczJ.RonquestR.ChettyS.GreenG.OliverS. (2023). Spanish in the Southeast: What a Swarm of variables can tell us about a newly forming bilingual community. Languages, 8, Article 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030168
24.
MontrulS. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142.
25.
MoschonasS. A. (2014). The media on media-induced language change. In AndroutsopoulosJ. (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 395–426). De Gruyter.
26.
MuhrR. (2003). Language change via satellite: The influence of German television broadcasting on Austrian German. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 4(1), 103–127.
27.
MüllerF. M. (1875). Lectures on the science of language (Vol.1). Scribner, Armstrong Company.
28.
NaroA. J. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language, 57(1), 63–98.
29.
OksaarE. (1972). Bilingualism. In SebeokT. A. (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics: Vol. 9. Linguistics in Western Europe (pp. 476–511). Hague: Mouton.
30.
OtaI.TakanoS. (2014). The media influence on language change in Japanese sociolinguistic contexts. In AndroutsopoulosJ. (Ed.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 171–203). De Gruyter.
31.
OtheguyR.ZentellaA. C. (2012). Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. Oxford University Press.
32.
PoplackS. (1997). The sociolinguistic dynamics of apparent convergence. In GuyG.FeaginC.BaughJ.SchiffrinD. (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honor of William Labov (pp. 285–309). Benjamins.
33.
PoplackS.LeveyS. (2010). Contact induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. In AuerP.SchmidtJ. E. (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation (pp. 391–419). Mouton de Gruyter.
34.
Raña RissoR. (2010). Subject pronoun placement as evidence of contact and leveling in Spanish in New York. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 203, 101–114.
35.
Raña RissoR. (2013). A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of subject pronoun placement in Spanish in New York [PhD dissertation, City University of New York].
36.
Raña-RissoR.Barrera-TobónC. (2018). On the relationship between subject placement and overt pronouns in the Spanish of New York City bilinguals. Journal of Language Contact, 11(2), 324–347.
37.
RivasJ. (2008). La posición del sujeto en las construcciones monoactanciales del español: Una aproximación funcional [Subject position in monoargumental clauses in Spanish: A functional approach]. Hispania, 91, 897–912.
38.
RivasJ. (2013). Variable subject position in main and subordinate clauses in Spanish: A usage-based approach. Moenia, 19, 97–113.
39.
SánchezM. E. (2008). Tipos de cláusula, clases verbales y posición del sujeto en español [Clause types, verb classes, and subject position in Spanish]. Lexis, 22, 83–105.
40.
SayersD. (2014). The mediated innovation model: A framework for researching media influence in language change. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18, 185–212.
41.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1982). Subject expression and placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In AmasteJ.Elías-OlivaresL. (Eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects (pp. 93–120). Cambridge University Press.
42.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford University Press.
43.
Silva-CorvalánC. (2001). Sociolingüística y Pragmática del Español [Sociolinguistics and Pragmatics of Spanish]. Georgetown University Press.
44.
SoraceA. (2012). Pinning down the concept of interface in bilingual development: A reply to peer commentaries. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(2), 209–217.
45.
Stuart-SmithJ. (2017). Bridging the gap(s): The role of style in language change linked to the broadcast media. In ThogersenJ.CouplandN.MortensenJ. (Eds.), Language (De)standardisation in late modern Europe: Style and media studies (pp. 51–84). Novus Press.
46.
TagliamonteS. A. (2014). Situating media influence in sociolinguistic context. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 223–232.
47.
ThomasonS. (2013). Contact explanations in linguistics. In HickeyR. (Ed.), Handbook of language contact (pp. 31–47). Blackwell.
48.
ThomasonS. G.KaufmanT. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
Torres CacoullosR.TravisC. E. (2010). Variable yo expression in New Mexico: English influence? In Rivera-MillsS.VillaD. (Eds.), Spanish of the U.S. Southwest: A language in transition (pp. 185–206). Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
50.
TreviñoK. (2020, November11–13). La clasificación de verbos intransitivos y la posición del sujeto [Classification of intransitive verbs and subject position] [Paper presentation]. The High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
51.
WeinreichU. (1986). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Linguistic Circle of New York. (Original work published 1953)
52.
WinfordD. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Blackwell.
