In this paper we present some results from an experimental study that we have been conducting into the effects of syntactic attrition on the L1 of Greek and Italian speakers who have achieved near-native proficiency in their L2 (English) but still use their L1 on a regular basis. In particular, we test the hypothesis, developed on the basis of assumptions regarding syntactic modularity, that the changes in L1 syntax will be restricted to the interface with the conceptual /intentional cognitive systems. The area of investigation is the domain of grammatical subjects in Greek and Italian. More specifically, we tested the participants on the production and interpretation of null and overt subjects, and of preverbal and postverbal subjects. We also elicited grammaticality judgments on subject extraction and subject position in various syntactic contexts. In this paper we report on the results of one of the production tasks (of preverbal and postverbal subjects) and two interpretation tasks. Attrition effects are found in the production of preverbal subjects in the Greek group whereas Italian speakers show attrition effects in the interpretation of overt pronominal subjects. We argue that these results are in the right direction, that is, that semantic features are vulnerable in language attrition whereas syntactic options remain intact.
Anderson, M. (1992). Intelligence and development: A cognitive theory . Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
Beck, M.L. (1998). L2 acquisition and Obligatory Head Movement: English-speaking learners of German and the Local Impairment Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 311-348.
3.
Belletti, A. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 1 - 34.
4.
Belletti, A. (2001). "Inversion" as focalisation. In A. Hulk & J.-Y. Pollock (Eds.), Subject inversion in romance and the theory of universal grammar (pp. 60 - 90). Oxford University Press.
5.
Birdsong, D. (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
7.
Cardinaletti, A. (1997). Subjects and clause structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), New comparative syntax . Longman Linguistics Library.
8.
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (2001). The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, Vol. 8 of Language Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
10.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Diesing, M. (1991). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
12.
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Grimshaw, J., & Samek-Lodovici, V. (1998). Optimal subjects and subject universals. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hangstrom , M. McGinnis & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax (pp. 193 - 219). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Guastibewlitx, M. (2002). Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Gürel, A. (2002). First language attrition: The effects of second language. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish & A. H. J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 26(1): 255 - 265.
16.
Håkansson, G. (1995). Syntax and morphology in language attrition: A study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 153 - 171.
17.
Hyams, N. (2001). Now you hear it, now you don't: The nature of optionality in child grammars. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.34 - 58). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
18.
Lambert, R. D., & Freed, B. (Eds.). (1982). The loss of language skills . Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
19.
Meisel, J. (Ed.). (1994). Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
Montalbetti, M. (1984). After binding. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge. Mass.
21.
Montrul, S. (2002) Divergent acquisition and attrition of Spanish Tense/Aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1).
22.
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional categories and parametric variation . Routledge.
23.
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1987). The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 289 - 318.
24.
Pinto, M. (1997). Licensing and interpretation of inverted subjects in Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.
25.
Platzack, C. (1999). Multiple Interfaces. (ms). Lund University, Dept. of Scandinavian Linguistics.
26.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
27.
Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro . Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501 - 555.
28.
Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1999). Losing the V2 constraint. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29.
Roussou, A., & Tsimpli, I. (to appear). On VSO again!To appear in Journal of Linguistics.
30.
Seliger, H.W. (1991). Language Attrition, reduced redundancy and creativity . In H. W. Seliger & R. M. Vago (Eds.), First language attrition (pp. 227 - 240). Cambridge University Press.
31.
Silva-Corvalan, C. (1991). Spanish language attrition in a contact situation with English. In H. Seliger & R. M. Vago (Eds.), First language attrition . Cambridge University Press.
32.
Smith, N., & Tsimpli, I. (1995). The mind of a Savant: Language learning and modularity . Blackwell.
33.
Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete versus divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22 - 47.
34.
Sorace, A. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of L2 near-native speakers. In BUCLD Proceedings 24, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press .
35.
Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford : Blackwell.
36.
Tsimpli, I. (1990). The clause structure and word-order of Modern Greek. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics , 2, 226 - 258.
37.
Tsimpli, I. (1997). Resumptive strategies and second language acquisition: A minimalist account. In BUCLD Proceedings 21 (pp. 639 - 655). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
38.
Tsimpli, I. (2001). LF-Interpretability and language development: A study of verbal and nominal features in Greek normally developing and SLI children. Brain and Language, 77, 432 - 448.
39.
Weltens, B., de Bot, K., & van Els, T. (1986). Language attrition in progress . Dordrecht: Foris.
40.
Wexler, K. (1996). The development of inflection in a biologically-based theory of language acquisition. In M. L. Rice (Ed.), Toward a genetics of language (pp.113 - 144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
41.
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic Theory. Oxford : Blackwell.
42.
White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233 - 265.
