The primary goal of this study was to investigate the knowledge of Russian gender in young heritage speakers through different agreement constructions.
Design/methodology/approach:
Participants were 30 Russian–Spanish–Catalan multilinguals from Spain aged 7–11 years, divided into two proficiency groups, and a baseline group of 24 age-matched Russian monolinguals residing in Russia. All participants completed four experiments using an oral elicited production task addressing different linguistic conditions.
Data and analysis:
The accuracy scores were compared between the two proficiency groups and between the heritage and monolingual speakers to document any changes as a function of the type of agreement construction, gender value, noun form transparency, and crosslinguistic congruency.
Findings/conclusions:
The results demonstrated a hierarchy of gender values; masculine being the easiest gender value, neuter the most difficult, and feminine in between the two. The crosslinguistic influence was yelled under vulnerable conditions: when (1) the proficiency in heritage language is low, (2) in opaque and (or) incongruent nouns, and (3) in agreement construction which is absent in Spanish and Catalan. The results also suggest that the heritage language from the high-proficiency group can attain monolingual-like gender agreement knowledge.
Originality:
We documented gender agreement production in trilingual speakers, which is an under-explored topic. The study employs a new method of analysing gender in several constructions, including adjectival and verbal agreement at Noun Phrase and sentence levels.
Significance/implications:
The study provides insights into heritage language development during the early years of exposure to the two majority languages. The results may offer a greater understanding of the characteristics of heritage language/L2 development in trilingual children.
AhutinaT.KurganskyA.KurganskayaM.PolinskyM.PolonskayaM.LarinaO.AppelbaumM. (2001). Processing of grammatical gender in normal and aphasic speakers of Russian. Cortex, 37, 295–326.
2.
AlarcónI. V. (2011). Spanish gender agreement under complete and incomplete acquisition: Early and late bilinguals’ linguistic behavior within the noun phrase. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 332–350.
3.
Arnaus GilL.MüllerN.SetteN.HüppopM. (2021). Active bi- and trilingualism and its influencing factors. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15(1), 1–22.
4.
Beatty-MartínezA. L.DussiasP. E. (2019). Revisiting masculine and feminine grammatical gender in Spanish: Linguistic, psycholinguistic, and neurolinguistic evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1664–1078.
5.
CeytlinS. N. (2005). Kategorija roda v detskoj rechi. [Gender category in child’s speech]. In BondarenkoA. V.ShubikS. A. (Eds.), Problemy funkcionalnoj grammatiki [Problems of functional grammar] (pp. 346–375).Russian Academy of Science.
6.
CeytlinS. N. (2009).Ocherki po slovoobrazovaniju I formoobrazovaniju v detskojrechi [Essays on word formation in child’s speech]. Znak.
7.
ChevalierS. (2012). Active trilingualism in early childhood: The motivating role of caregivers in interaction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9(4), 437–454.
8.
CorbettG.FraserN. (1999). Default genders. In UnterbeckBarbaraRissanenMattiNevalainenTerttuSaariMirja (eds.), Gender in Grammar and Cognition I. Approaches to Gender (pp. 55–97). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9.
CorbettG. (2013). Canonical morphosyntactic features. In BrownD. (pp. 48–65).
10.
de NijsP. (2021). Early trilingual language acquisition of Spanish, English, and French by a two-year-old American child. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development, 9(3), 321–334.
11.
DieserE. (2007). Osvojenije kategorii roda v ramkakh detskogo dvu – trekhjazychija. Semanticheskije kategorii v detskoj rechi [Acquisition of gender in bi and trilingual context. Semantic categories in child’s speech] In CeytlinS. N. (Ed.), Semantičeskije kategorii v detskoj reči [Semantic categories in child’s speech] (pp. 244–263). Nestor-Istorija.
12.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III. American Guidance Service.
13.
Escobar UrmenetaC.UnamunoV. (2008). Languages and language learning in Catalan Schools: From the bilingual to the multilingual challenge. In HélotC.de MejíaA.-M. (Eds.), Forging multilingual spaces: Integrated perspectives on majority and minority bilingual education (pp. 228–255). Multilingual Matters.
14.
GvozdevA. N. (1961). Voprosy izučenija detskoj reči [Questions of research of child’s speech]. Russian Academy of Science.
15.
KupischT.GeissM.MitrofanovaN.WestergaardM. (2022). Structural and phonological cues for gender assignment in monolingual and bilingual children acquiring German. Experiments with real and nonce words. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7(1), 1–37.
16.
LemmerthN.HoppH. (2017). Gender processing in simultaneous and successive bilingual children: Effects of lexical and syntactic cross-linguistic influence. Language Acquisition, 26(1), 21–45.
17.
LiashevskayaO. N.SharovS. A. (2009). Chastotnyj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazyka [Frequency dictionary of Russian language]. Azbukovnik.
18.
MariscalS. (2009). Early acquisition of gender agreement in the Spanish noun phrase: Starting small. Journal of Child Language, 36(1), 143–171.
19.
MeirN.PolinskyM. (2021). Restructuring in heritage grammars: Adjective-noun and numeral-noun expressions in Israeli Russian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 222–258.
20.
MitrofanovaN.RodinaY.UrekO.WestergaardM. (2018). Bilinguals’ sensitivity to grammatical gender cues in Russian: The role of cumulative input, proficiency, and dominance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–20.
21.
MontrulS. (2010a). Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 3–23.
22.
MontrulS. (2010b). Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and HS. Second Language Research, 26(3), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310365768
23.
MontrulS. (2013). How native are HS? A look at gender agreement in Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 10(2), 15–39.
24.
MontrulS. (2016). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press.
25.
MontrulS.de la FuenteI.DavidsonJ.FooteR. (2014). Early language experience facilitates gender agreement processing in Spanish HS. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 118–138.
26.
MontrulS.FooteR.PerpinánS. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish HS: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553.
27.
MontrulS.PotowskiK. (2007). Command of gender agreement in school age Spanish-English bilingual children. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 301–328.
28.
ParadisJ. (2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with Specific Language Impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36, 172–187.
29.
Pérez-PereiraM. (1991). The acquisition of gender: What Spanish children tell us. Journal of Child Language, 18(3), 571–590.
30.
PolinskyM. (2008). Gender under incomplete acquisition: HS’ knowledge of noun categorization. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 40–71.
31.
PolinskyM.ScontrasG. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20.
32.
RodinaY.KupischT.MeirN.MitrofanovaN.UrekO.WestergaardM. (2020). Internal and external factors in heritage language acquisition: Evidence from heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Genetics, 5, Article 20.
33.
RodinaY.WestergaardM. (2017). Grammatical gender in bilingual Norwegian–Russian acquisition: The role of input and transparency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(1), 197–214.
34.
SchepensJ.van der SlikF.van HoutR. (2015). L1 and L2 distance effects in learning L3 Dutch. Language Learning, 66, 224–256.
35.
SchwartzM.MinkovM.DieserE.ProtassovaE.MoinV.PolinskyM. (2014). Acquisition of Russian gender agreement by monolingual and bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(6), 726–752.
36.
SlioussarN.SamoilovaM. (2015). Častotnosti različnyx grammatičeskix xarakteristik i okončanij u suščestvitel’nyx russkogo jazyka. [Frequencies of different grammatical features and inflectional affixes in Russian nouns]. In Proceedings of the conference ‘Dialogue’. Available at: http://www.dialog-21.ru/digests/dialog2015/materials/pdf/SlioussarNASamoilovaMV.pdf
37.
SnodgrassJ. G.VanderwartM. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
38.
TarabanR.KempeV. (1999). Gender processing in native and nonnative Russian speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 119–148.
39.
TesteletsY. G. (2008). Struktura predloženij s nevyražennoj svjazkoj v russkom jazyke. [Syntactic structures with a covert copula in Russian] In RozinaR. I.KustovaG. I. (Eds.), Dinamičeskie modeli: Slovo. Predloženie. Tekst. Sbornik statej v čest’ E.V. Padučevoj [Dynamic models: Sentence and text. In honour of E. V. Padučeva] (pp. 773–789). Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur.
40.
TsimpliI. M. (2014). Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(3), 283–313.
41.
UnsworthS. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 86–110.
42.
UnsworthS. (2016). Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In NicoladisE.MontanariS. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism (pp. 136–196). Mouton de Gruyter.
43.
UnsworthS.ArgyriF.CornipsL.HulkA.SoraceA.TsimpliI. (2014). The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 765–805.
44.
VoeikovaM. D. (2011). Rannie etapy usvoenija det’mi imennoj morfologii russkogo jazyka. [Early phases of first language acquisition of Russian nominal morphology by children]. Znak.
45.
VoeikovaM. D. (2015). Introduction. Adjectives acquisition across languages. In TribushininaE.VoeikovaM. D.NoccettiS. (Eds.),Semantics and morphology of early adjectives in first language acquisition (pp. 1–23). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
46.
VorobyevaT.BelA. (2021). Factors affecting language proficiency in heritage language: The case of young Russian heritage speakers in Spain. Journal of Language Contact, 14(2), 304–330.
