Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims:

The current study investigated the effects of first language (L1) congruency, word frequency, collocational frequency, second language (L2) proficiency, and their combined effects on L2 collocational processing.

Methodology:

Twenty English native speakers and 60 adult Chinese–English bilinguals (intermediate and advanced) completed an online phrasal decision task. They made a judgment about whether target word pairs (congruent collocations, incongruent collocations, and non-collocational baseline items) were commonly used in English.

Data and analysis:

Response time and accuracy data were analyzed with mixed-effects models, with focus on the interactions of the variables of interest.

Findings:

Results demonstrated differential effects for the response time and accuracy data: (1) both L2 groups were significantly more accurate but not significantly faster in judging the congruent collocations than the incongruent collocations, and unexpectedly similar patterns were observed with the L1 group; (2) all participants were sensitive to word frequency and collocational frequency, but they differed in the manner and degree of such sensitivity; and (3) the processing of incongruent collocations showed greater combined effects of word frequency and collocational frequency than did the processing of congruent collocations.

Originality:

We specifically investigated the effects of multiple influencing factors and their combined effects. In addition, we addressed a methodological limitation regarding stimuli control by using congruent and incongruent collocational pairs that differed in only one constituent word.

Implications:

Our findings highlight the non-colinear relationship of L2 proficiency and (explicit and implicit) collocational knowledge as well as the semantic aspects of cross-language differences, and they also support the usage-based models.

Keywords

L1 congruency word frequency collocational frequency L2 proficiency L2 collocational processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.

Bybee

J. L.

(2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.

Crossley

S. A.

Salsbury

McNamara

D. S.

(2015). Assessing lexical proficiency using analytic ratings: A case for collocation accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 570–590.

Davies

(2004). BYU-BNC: The British National Corpus. BYE, Brigham Young University. http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc

Davies

(2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. BYE, Brigham Young University. https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/

Ding

Reynolds

B. L.

(2019). The effects of L1 congruency, L2 proficiency, and the collocate-node relationship on the processing of L2 English collocations by L1-Chinese EFL learners. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 331–357.

Gyllstad

Wolter

(2016). Collocational processing in light of the phraseological continuum model: Does semantic transparency matter? Language Learning, 66(2), 296–323.

Howarth

P. A.

(1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24–44.

Jacobs

C. L.

Dell

G. S.

Benjamin

A. S.

Bannard

(2016). Part and whole linguistic experience affect recognition memory for multiword sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 38–58.

10.

Jiang

(2012). Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. Routledge.

11.

Kapatsinski

Radicke

(2009). Frequency and the emergence of prefabs: Evidence from monitoring. In Corrigan

Moravcsik

E. A.

Ouali

Wheatley

(Eds.), Typological studies in language (p. 499). John Benjamins.

12.

Laufer

Girsai

(2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716.

13.

Lenth

Singmann

Love

Buerkner

Herve

(2018). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html

14.

Meara

Jones

(1990). Eurocentres vocabulary size tests 10KA. Eurocentres Learning Service.

15.

Nesselhauf

(2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223–242.

16.

Öksüz

Brezina

Rebuschat

(2021). Collocational processing in L1 and L2: The effects of word frequency, collocational frequency, and association. Language Learning, 71(1), 55–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12427

17.

R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

18.

Schmitt

Clapham

(2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88.

19.

Sonbul

(2015). Fatal mistake, awful mistake, or extreme mistake? Frequency effects on off-line/on-line collocational processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(3), 419–437.

20.

Sosa

A. V.

MacFarlane

(2002). Evidence for frequency-based constituents in the mental lexicon: Collocations involving the word of. Brain and Language, 83(2), 227–236.

21.

Tomasello

(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.

22.

Toomer

Elgort

(2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69(3), 783–783.

23.

Wolter

Gyllstad

(2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 430–449.

24.

Wolter

Gyllstad

(2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482.

25.

Wolter

Yamashita

(2018). Word frequency, collocational frequency, L1 congruency, and proficiency in L2 collocational processing: What accounts for L2 performance? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 395–416.

26.

Wray

(2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.

27.

Yamashita

(2018). Possibility of semantic involvement in the L1-L2 congruency effect in the processing of L2 collocations. Journal of Second Language Studies, 1(1), 60–78.

28.

Yamashita

Jiang

(2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 647–668.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

L1 congruency,word frequency,collocational frequency,L2 proficiency,and their combined effects on Chinese–English bilinguals’ L2 collocational processing

Abstract

Aims:

Methodology:

Data and analysis:

Findings:

Originality:

Implications:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material