The main goal of this study was to examine noun–adjective gender agreement in Russian by comparing bilingual children with diverse L2 backgrounds (English, Finnish, German, and Hebrew) with age-matched monolingual children and monolinguals one year younger. This comparison was made to investigate the influence of L2 grammar on the acquisition of gender agreement by (L1) Russian-speaking children.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
The participants included four groups of 4–5-year-old bilingual children with Russian as L1 and English, German, Finnish, or Hebrew as L2, who were compared to monolingual children in Russia in two age groups (3–4 and 4–5 years old). The children were matched by socioeconomic status and parents’ educational background. All children were tested individually during one testing session. Agreement data were elicited using a semi-structured elicitation test, with verbal and visual stimuli.
Data and Analysis:
We used qualitative data analysis to identify types and categories of errors, and quantitative data analysis to compare the tendencies of noun–adjective gender agreement in Russian (L1) between the groups.
Findings/Conclusions:
Development of gender agreement in the bilingual children from different L2 backgrounds was qualitatively similar to that of the 3–4-year-old monolingual Russian-speaking children. This result suggests that bilingual development in L1 follows the same developmental path as monolingual development, albeit with a delay. In addition, bilingual children whose L2 has grammatical gender (German, Hebrew) outperformed the other bilinguals on gender agreement, indicating that the presence of a grammatical category in both languages spoken by a bilingual facilitates category acquisition.
Originality and Significance/Implications:
The study contributes to the discussion on how the transparency and phonological saliency might affect the bilingual children’s acquisition of inflectional morphology and on how influence of L2 on L1 might in some cases help and in other cases impede the acquisition of L1.
AhutinaT.KurganskyA.KurganskayaM.PolinskyM.PolonskayaM.LarinaO.…AppelbaumM. (2001). Processing of grammatical gender in normal and aphasic speakers of Russian. Cortex, 37, 295–326.
2.
Alfi-ShabtayI.RavidD. (2012). Adjective inflection in Hebrew: A psycholinguistic study in speakers of Russian, English and Arabic compared with native Hebrew speakers. In LeikinM.SchwartzM.TobinY. (Eds.), Current issues in bilingualism: complex approach to multidimensional phenomenon (pp. 159–178). New York: Springer.
3.
AndersonR. T. (1999). Noun phrase gender agreement in language attrition: Preliminary results. Bilingual Research Journal, 23, 318–337.
4.
Ben-RafaelE.LyubanskyM.GlöcknerO.HarrisP.IsraelY.JasperW.SchoepsJ. (2006). Building a diaspora: Russian Jews in Israel, Germany and the USA. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
5.
BermanR. A. (1985). Acquisition of Hebrew. In SlobinD. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 255–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BermanR. A. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In BermanR. A. (Ed.), Language developmental across childhood and adolescence: Psycholinguistic and crosslinguistic perspectives, TILAR series. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
7.
BrehmerB. (2007). Sprechen Sie Qwelja? Formen und Folgen russisch-deutscher Zweisprachigkeit in Deutschland. In AnstattT. (Ed.), Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen: Erwerb, Formen, Förderung (pp. 163–187). Tübingen: Germany Attempto.
8.
BrownR. (1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BybeeJ. L.SlobinD. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289.
10.
CeytlinS. N. (2000) Jazyk i rebenok. Lingvistika detskoj rechi. Moscow, Russia: Vlados.
11.
CeytlinS. N. (2005). Kategorija roda v detskoj rechi. In BondarenkoA. V.ShubikS. A. (Eds.), Problemy funkcionalnoj grammatiki (pp. 346–375). St Petersburg, Russia: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk.
12.
CeytlinS. N. (2009) Ocherki po slovoobrazovaniju I formoobrazovaniju v detskoj rechi. Moscow, Russia: Znak.
13.
ComrieB.StoneG.PolinskyM. (1996). The Russian language in the twentieth century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
CorbettG. G. (1982). Gender in Russian: An account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics, 6, 197–232.
15.
CorbettG. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DieserE. (2007a). Early language separation. A longitudinal study of a Russian-German bilingual child. In FeatherstonS.SternefeldW. (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 133–160). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
17.
DieserE. (2007b). Osvojenije kategorii roda v ramkakh detskogo dvu – trekhjazychija. Semanticheskije kategorii detskoj rechi. In CeytlinS. N. (Ed.), Semantičeskije kategorii v detskoj reči (pp. 244–263). St Petersburg, Russia: Nestor-Istorija.
18.
DieserE. (2009). Genuserwerb im Russischen und Deutschen. Korpusgestützte Studie zu ein- und zweisprachigen Kindern und Erwachsenen. München, Germany: Kubon & Sagner [Slavolinguistika], 356 S.
19.
DresslerW. U. (2007). Introduction. In LaahaS.GillisS. (Eds.), Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology (pp. 3–9). Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112. Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp.
20.
DubininaI.PolinskyM. (2013). Russian in the USA. In MoserM.PolinskyM. (Eds.), Slavic languages in migration (pp. 123–154). Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna Press.
21.
EisenbergP. (1999). Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler.
22.
EllisC.ConradieS.HuddlestoneK. (2012) The acquisition of grammatical gender in L2 German by learners with Afrikaans, English or Italian as their L1. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics, 41, 17–27.
23.
EngelbergM. (2002). Finnish. The communication of gender in Finnish. In HellingerM.BußmannH. (Eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men (Vol. 2., pp. 109–132). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
24.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
GathercoleV. M. (2006). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: Morpho-syntactic development in bilingual children. Manuscript, University of Wales Bangor.
26.
GillisS. (2003). A case study of the early acquisition of verbs in Dutch. In BittnerD.DresslerW. U.Kilani-SchochM. (Eds.), Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp.171–203). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
HakulinenA. (toim.) (2004). Iso suomen kielioppi. Hämeenlinna, Finland: Karisto.
29.
HelbigG.BuschaJ.(2007). Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Berlin, Germany: Langenscheid.
30.
HulkA.CornipsL. (2006). Between 2L1- and child L2 acquisition: An experimental study of bilingual Dutch. In ConxitaL. (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism (pp. 115–138). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
31.
KöpckeK.-M. (1982). Untersuchungen zum Genussystem der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
32.
KöpckeK.-M.ZubinD. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.
33.
KupischT.MüllerN.CantoneK. (2002). Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition: Comparing Italian and French. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 107–149.
34.
LaahaS.GillisS. (Eds.) (2007). Typological perspectives on the acquisition of noun and verb morphology. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112. Antwerp, Belgium: University of Antwerp.
35.
LaaksoJ. (2005). Our otherness. Finno-Ugrian Approaches to Women’s studies, or vice versa. Finno-Ugrian Studies in Austria 2. LIT, Wien.
36.
LahhaS.RavidD.Korecky-KröllK.LaahaG.DresslerW. U. (2006). Early noun plurals in German: regularity productivity or default?Journal of Child Language, 33, 271–302.
37.
LavieN. (2006). The acquisition of noun plurals by normally developing Hebrew speaking children. Unpublished master’s thesis. Tel-Aviv University.
38.
LibermanI.ShankweilerD.FischerF.CarterB. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.
39.
LievenE.TomaselloM. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In RobinsonP.EllisN. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
MeiselJ. M. (2009). Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28, 5–34.
41.
Ministry of Immigrant Absorption in Israel (2008) Immigration to Israel. Retrieved from http://www.moia.gov.il [in Hebrew].
42.
MontrulS. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
43.
NicoladisE.PalmerA.MarentetteP. (2007). The role of type and token frequency in using past tense morphemes correctly. Developmental Science, 10, 237–254.
44.
ParadisJ. (2007). Early bilingual and multilingual acquisition. In AuerP.WeiL. (Eds.), Handbooks of applied linguistics (vol. 5): Multilingualism (pp. 15–44). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
45.
ParadisJ. (2009). Oral language development in French and English and the role of home input factors. Report for the Conseil Scolarie Centre-Nord, Edmonton, Alberta.
46.
ParadisJ. (2011). The impact of input factors on bilingual development: quantity versus quality: Quantity versus quality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 67–70.
47.
ParadisJ.CragoM.GeneseeF. (2005/2006). Domain-general versus domain-specific accounts of Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from bilingual children’ acquisition of object pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13, 33-62.
48.
ParadisJ.GeneseeF. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or Interdependent?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.
49.
ParadisJ.NicoladisE.CragoM. (2007). French-English bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston University.
PolinskyM. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 192–265.
52.
PolinskyM. (2008). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers knowledge of non-categorisation. Heritage Language Journal, 6, 40–71.
53.
PopovaM. I. (1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of pre-school children. In FergusonC. A.SlobinD. I. (Eds.), Studies of Child Language Development (265–281). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
54.
ProtassovaE. (2007). Stability and instability in language: contemporary changes in ”Finland’s Russian”. Siirtolaisuus-Migration, 1, 20–30.
55.
RavidD. (1995a). Language change in child and adult Hebrew: A psycholinguistic perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
RavidD. (1995b). The acquisition of morphological junctions in Modern Hebrew. In PishwaH.MaroldtK. (Eds.), The development of morphological systematicity: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 55–77). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
57.
RavidD. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew Spelling. New York: Springer.
58.
RavidD.SchiffR. (2009). Morphophonological categories of noun plurals in Hebrew: a developmental study. Linguistics, 47, 45-63.
59.
RothweilerM. (July-August, 2008). Verbal inflection, case morphology and the acquisition of sentence structure in early successive bilinguals. Paper presented at the 11th Congress of the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Edinburgh, UK.
60.
SabourinL.StoweL.de HaanG. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22, 1–29.
61.
SchelletterC. (2007, May–June). Children’s acquisition of regular and irregular morphology: Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Paper presented at the 6th International Symposium on Bilingualism, Hamburg, Germany.
62.
SchwartzM.KozminskyE.LeikinM. (2009). Delayed acquisition of irregular inflectional morphology in Hebrew in early sequential bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 501–522.
63.
SlobinD. I. (1985). Cross-linguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In SlobinD. (Ed.), The Cross Linguistic Study of Language Acquisition. II. Theoretical Issues (pp. 1157–1249). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
SpolskyB.ShohamyE. (1999). The languages of Israel: Policy, ideology and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
65.
Statistics Finland (2013). Tilastotietokannat > Tietokanta: PX-Web Statfin > Väestö/Väestörakenne. Retrieved from www.tilastokeskus.fi
66.
TainioL. (2006). Gender in Finnish Language Use: Equal, Inequal and/or Queer? WEBFU [Wiener elektronische Beiträge des Instituts für Finno-Ugristik]. Retrieved from http://webfu.univie.ac.at/texte/tainio.pdf
67.
TimberlakeA. (1993). Russian. In ComrieB.CorbettG. (Eds.), The Slavonic languages (pp. 827–886). London, UK: Routledge.
68.
TomaselloM. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
69.
TreimanR.ZukowskiA. (1996). Children’s sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 193–215.
ZdorenkoT.ParadisJ. (2008). The Acquisition of Articles in Child Second Language English: Fluctuation, Transfer or Both?Second Language Research, 24(2), 227–250.
