The factor attitude is generally considered to be among the most influential for first language (L1) attrition. Nevertheless, empirical validations have proven difficult to establish. While some studies could not find clear links between measures of attitude and L1 attrition (Hulsen, 2000; Yağmur, 1997), others showed that attitudes generated from exceptional life events strongly influenced attrition (Schmid, 2002) and that pragmatic vs. ideological motivation to emigrate and ensuing attitudes were clearly linked to L1 attrition (Ben-Rafael & Schmid, 2007). A closer examination of these studies yields a noteworthy pattern: those studies that relied on questionnaires (Hulsen, 2000, Yağmur, 1997) seemed to find no straight correlations between attitude and L1 performance, while the studies that used interviews (Ben-Rafael & Schmid, 2007; Schmid, 2002) established a clearer link between the two. The present study explores the impact of attitude – as measured through both questionnaires and interviews – on L1 attrition and second language (L2) proficiency. The quantitative analysis revealed partially significant results, thus suggesting that the factor attitude would have a limited impact on L1 attrition. Individual qualitative analyses, on the other hand, revealed important links between attitudes and the migrants’ language proficiency profiles. The article argues for a combination of methodological approaches in the study of L1 attrition and underlines the idea that individual-level analyses are well suited to capture the non-linearity of attitude and its impact on L1 attrition. These conclusions fit well with a Dynamic Systems Theory perspective in relation to the constant flux of attitude perceptions and their unpredictable role in attrition (de Bot, Lowie & Verspoor, 2007).
AgheyisiR.FishmanJ. (1970). Language attitudes: A brief survey of methodological approaches. Anthropological Linguistics, 12, 137-157.
2.
AllportF. H. (1967). Social psychology. New York, NY: Johnson Reprint Corp.
3.
AndersenR. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In LambertR. D.FreedB. F. (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
4.
Ben-RafaelM.SchmidM. S. (2007). Language attrition and ideology: Two groups of immigrants in Israel. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 205-226). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
5.
BierbachC. (1988). Les actituds lingüístiques. In BastardasA.SolerJ. (Eds.), Sociolingüística i llengua catalana (pp. 155-183). Barcelona, Spain: Empúries.
6.
CherciovM. (2011). Between attrition and acquisition: The dynamics between two languages in adult migrants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
7.
CookV.IarossiE.NektariosS.YukiT. (2003). Effects of the L2 on the syntactic processing of the L1. In CookV. (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 193-213). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8.
CooperR. L.FishmanJ. A. (1974). The study of language attitudes. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 3, 5-19.
9.
CrystalD. (1992). An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
10.
De BotK. (2007). Dynamic systems theory, lifespan development and language attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), First language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 56-68). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
11.
De BotK.LowieW.VerspoorM. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10 (1), 7-21.
12.
DittmarN. (1976). Sociolinguistics: A critical survey of theory and application. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
13.
DorianN. C. (1982). Language loss and maintenance in language contact situations. In LambertR.FreedB. (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 44-59). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
14.
DörnyeiZ. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
DörnyeiZ. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
DörnyeiZ.ClementR. (2001). Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of a nationwide survey. In DörnyeiZ.SchmidtR. W. (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 395-430). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Mānoa.
17.
DostertS. (2009). Multilingualism, L1 attrition and the concept of ‘native speaker’. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Heinrich Heine Unviersität, Düsseldorf.
18.
ExtraG.YağmurK. (2010). Language proficiency and socio-cultural orientation of Turkish and Moroccan youngsters in the Netherlands. Language and Education, 24(2), 117-132.
19.
GardnerR. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: E. Arnold.
20.
GrosjeanF. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3-15.
21.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1-22). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22.
GrosjeanF.PyB. (1991). La restructuration d’une première langue: l’intégration de variantes de contact dans la compétence de migrants bilingues. La Linguistique, 27, 35-60.
23.
GrotjahnR.Klein-BraleyC.RaatzU. (2002). C-tests: An overview. In ColemanJ. A.GrotjahnR.RaatzU. (Eds), University language testing and the C-test (pp. 93-110). Bochum, Germany: AKS-Verlag.
24.
HerdinaP.JessnerU. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
25.
HulsenM. (2000). Language loss and language processing. Three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. Doctoral dissertation, Nijmegen, Katholieke Universiteit.
26.
JessnerU. (2003). A dynamic approach to language attrition in multilingual systems. In CookV. (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 234-247). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
27.
KirkR. E. (1990). Statistics: An introduction. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
28.
KöpkeB. (2001). Quels changements linguistiques dans l’attrition de la L1 chez le bilingue tardif?Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, 34/35, 355-368.
29.
KöpkeB. (2004). Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(1), 3-30.
30.
KöpkeB.SchmidM. S. (2004). Language attrition: The next phase. In SchmidM. S.KöpkeB.KeijzerM.WeilemarL. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 1-43). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
31.
LambertW. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91-108.
OakesL. (2001). Language and national identity. Comparing France and Sweden. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
34.
OskampS. (1977). Attitudes and opinions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
OskampS.SchultzP. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
36.
PrescherP. (2007). Identity, immigration and first language attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), First language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 189-205). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
37.
RaatzU.Klein-BraleyC. (2002). Introduction to language testing and to C-tests. In ColemanJ. A.GrotjahnR.RaatzU. (Eds.), University language testing and the C-test (pp. 75-89). Bochum, Germany: AKS-Verlag.
38.
SchmidM. S. (2002). First language attrition, use and maintenance: The case of German Jews in Anglophone countries. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
39.
SchmidM. S. (2005). The language attrition test battery. A research manual. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. (Unpublished manuscript).
40.
SchmidM. S. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM. S.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), First language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 135-152). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
SchmidM. S. (2011). Language attrition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SchmidM. S.DusseldorpE. (2010). Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: The impact of extralinguistic factors. Second Language Research, 26(1), 125-160.
44.
SeligerH. W. (1991). Language attrition, reduced redundancy, and creativity. In SeligerH. W.VagoR. M. (Eds.), First language attrition (pp. 227-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SeligerH. W. (1996). Primary language attrition in the context of bilingualism. In RitchieW. C.BhatiaT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 605-626). New York, NY: Academic Press.
46.
SkaadenH. (2005). First language attrition and linguistic creativity. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9 (3 & 4), 435-452.
YağmurK. (1997). First language attrition among Turkish speakers in Sydney. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
49.
YağmurK. (2011). Does ethnolinguistic vitality theory account for the actual vitality of ethnic groups? A critical evaluation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 111-120.
50.
YağmurK.EhalaM. (2011). Tradition and innovation in the Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 101-110.
51.
Yoshizawa MeadersN. (1997). The transcultural self. In ElovitzP. H.KhanC. (Eds.), Immigrant experiences: Personal narrative and psychological analysis (pp. 47-59). Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
