A group of 118 sixteen-year-old students of ethnic Indian and Pakistani origin, learning school Chinese, judged on-line the grammaticality of 18 pairs of sentences in Chinese and English. We hypothesized: (a) The students might not perform worse in simple Chinese sentence processing as compared with equivalent English sentences. (b) There would be an overall school effect as proxy for learning experience. (c) Grammatically correct sentences would be processed more efficiently than anomalous ones. MANCOVA (age as covariate) and efficiency indices, by taking into account both accuracy and reaction time, support the hypotheses. The results are discussed in learning form and meaning of school Chinese.
AkamatsuN. (2008). The effects of training on automatization of word recognition in English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 175–193.
2.
BauerR. S.BenedictP. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
BialystokE. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70, 636–644.
4.
BialystokE. (2001). Bilingualism in development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BialystokE. (2007). Language acquisition and bilingualism: Consequences for a multilingual society. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 393–397.
6.
CampbellJ. R.KellyD. L.MullisI. V. S.MartinM. O.SainsburyM. (2001). Framework and specifications for PIRLS assessment 2001 (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
7.
ChaoY. R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CookV. (2003). Introduction: The changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind. In CookV. (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 1–18). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
10.
DanielsP.BrightW. (Eds.). (1996). The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeKeyserR. (Ed.). (2005). Grammatical development in language learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
DurgunoğluA. Y. (2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–204.
13.
EllisR. (1991). Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 13, 161–186.
14.
FergusonC. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 14, 47–56.
15.
FlegeJ. E.Yeni-KomshianG. H.LiuS. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.
16.
GassS. M. (1986). An interactionist approach to L2 sentence interpretation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 19–37.
17.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The bilingual’s language models. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
HallidayM. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). New York: Edward Arnold.
19.
HarringtonM. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351–377.
20.
HarringtonM. (2001). Sentence processing. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 91–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2007). Statistical tables of the 2006 population by-census. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
22.
Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council. (January, 2008). Guide to the development of Chinese language curriculum materials for non-native Chinese students: Consultative document. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Curriculum Development Council [in Chinese].
JohnsonJ. S.NewportE. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 60–99.
25.
JuffsA.HarringtonM. (1995). Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in WH-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition Research, 17, 483–512.
26.
LeongC. K.HoM. K. (2008). The role of lexical knowledge and related linguistic components in typical and poor language comprehenders of Chinese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 559–586.
27.
LeongC. K.TseS. K.LohK. Y.HauK. T. (2008). Text comprehension in Chinese children: Relative contribution of verbal working memory, pseudoword reading, rapid automatized naming, and onset-rime phonological segmentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 135–149.
28.
LiC. N.ThompsonS. A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
LiP. (1998). Crosslinguistic variation and sentence processing: The case of Chinese. In HillertD. (Ed.), Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 33–51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
LiP.BatesE.MacWhinneyB. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169–192.
31.
MacWhinneyB. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MacWhinneyB.BatesE. (Eds.). (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
McDonaldJ. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influence of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395–423.
34.
MiaoX.-C. (1981). Word order and semantic strategies in Chinese sentence comprehension. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8, 109–122.
35.
MiaoX.-C.ZhuM.-S. (1992). Language development in Chinese children. In ChenH. C.TzengO. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 237–276). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36.
MunnichE.FlynnS.MartohardjonoG. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammatical judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In TaroneE. E.GassS. M.CohenA. D. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 227–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
OdlinT. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
QuirkR.SvartvikJ. (1966). Investigating linguistic acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.
39.
RatcliffR. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.
40.
RobinsonP.SkehanP. (Eds.). (2002). Individual differences and second language instruction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41.
SegalowitzN. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In DoughtyC. J.LongM. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–408). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
42.
SegalowitzN.PoulsenC.SegalowitzS. (1999). RT coefficient of variation is differentially sensitive to executive control involvement in an attention switching task. Brain and Cognition, 40, 255–258.
43.
SegalowitzN. S.SegalowitzS. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 369–385.
44.
SegalowitzS. J.SegalowitzN. S.WoodA. G. (1998). Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 53–67.
45.
ShuHChenX.AndersonR. C.WuN.XuanY. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74, 27–47.
46.
SnowC. E.KangJ. Y. (2006). Becoming bilingual, biliterate, and bicultural. In RenningerK. A.SiegelI. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4: Child psychology in practice (pp. 75–102). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
47.
SoraceA. (1996). The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In RitchieW. C.BhatiaT. J. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375–409). New York: Academic Press.
48.
TseS. K.LohK. Y. E.LamY. H. R.LamW. I. J. (2010). A comparison of English and Chinese reading proficiency of primary school Chinese students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31, 181–199.
49.
TseS. K.ShumS. K.MiaoK. O.KiW. W. (2001). Errors in mapping out essay topics and language expressions. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press [in Chinese].
50.
VaidJ.PadakannayaP. (Eds.). (2004). Reading and writing in semi-syllabic scripts [special issue]. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17(1–2).
51.
WangM.KodaK.PerfettiC. A. (2003). Alphabetic and non-alphabetic effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.
52.
ZevinJ. D.SeidenbergM. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and language, 47, 1–29.
