Mosetén (Mosetenan) is spoken by approximately 800 people in the foothills of the Bolivian Andes. All of the speakers are bilingual in Spanish and Mosetén. Spanish is highly dominant and as expected, Mosetén has borrowed many structures from this language. I focus on Spanish grammatical markers that are integrated into the Mosetén system. These elements include coordinating and subordinating conjunctions, discourse markers, certain prepositions as well as markers expressing delimitation. Most of the elements are similar to gestures and function above the level of the proposition. They can be used together with native markers that express similar notions and in some cases have different functions from their equivalents in Spanish. I will show that the contact phenomena in Mosetén are typical for languages in similar situations. This similarity can be explained by the processes that appear at the very onset of borrowing in addition to comparable circumstances during the integration into the system of the language.
Aikhenvald, A. (2002). Language contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
Backus, A. (2005). Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3&4), 307-340.
3.
Brody, J. (1987). Particles borrowed from Spanish as discourse markers in Mayan languages. Anthropological Linguistics, 29(4), 507-521.
4.
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach . Harlow, England: Longman Linguistics Library.
5.
Elsik, V., & Matras, Y. (2006). Markedness and language change: The Romani sample . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
Everett, D. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology, 46, 621-646.
7.
Field, F. (2002). Linguistic borrowing in bilingual contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
8.
Field, F. (2005). Long-term effects of CS: Clues to structural borrowing . International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3&4), 341-360.
9.
Gardner-Chloros, P. (1995). Code-switching in community, regional and national repertoires: The myth of the discreteness of linguistic systems. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp. 68-111). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210-231.
11.
Heath, J. (1984). Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 367 - 384.
12.
Matras, Y. (1998). Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics, 36(2), 281-331.
13.
Matras, Y. (2000). Fusion and the cognitive basis for bilingual discourse markers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4(4), 505-528.
14.
Matras, Y. (2003/2004). Layers of convergent syntax in Macedonian Turkish. Mediterranean Language Review, 15, 63-86.
15.
Matras, Y. (in press). Contact, connectivity and language evolution. In J. Rehbein, C. Hohenstein & L. Pietsch (Eds.), Connectivity in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16.
Matras, Y., & J., Sakel, (in press). Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language.
17.
Miller, W.R. (1990). Early Spanish and Aztec loan words in the indigenous languages of Northwest Mexico. In B. Garza Cuarón & P. Levy (Eds.), Homenaje a Jorge A. Suárez. Lingüística indoamericana e hispánica (pp. 351 - 366). (Estudios de Lingüística y literatura 18). México: El Colegio de México.
18.
Muysken, P. (2001). Spanish grammatical elements in Bolivian Quechua: The Transcripciones Quechuas corpus. In K. Zimmermann & T. Stolz (Eds.), Lo propio y lo ajeno en las lenguas austronésicas y amerindias. Procesos interculturales en el contacto de lenguas indígenas con el español en el Pacífico e Hispanoamérica (pp. 59-82). Frankfurt am Main : Vervuert.
19.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling languages. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20.
Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Nordell, N. (1980). Spanish loan words via Aztec. SIL-Workpapers, 5, 9-23.
22.
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en Español: Toward a typology of codeswitching. Linguistics , 18, 47-104.
23.
Sakel, J. (2002). Gender agreement in Mosetén. In M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke , S. Meira & H. van der Voort (Eds.), Current studies on South American languages (ILLA vol. 3, pp.287-305). Leiden: CNWS.
24.
Sakel, J. (2004). A grammar of Mosetén. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter (Mouton Grammar Library, Vol. 33).
25.
Sakel, J. (to appear, a). Contact between Mosetén and Spanish. In Y. Matras & J. Sakel (Eds.), Grammatical borrowing. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
26.
Sakel, J. (to appear, b). The verbness markers of Mosetén from a typological perspective. In M. Miestamo & B. Wälchli (Eds.), Current trends in typology . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
Sakel, J., & Y. Matras (2006, February). Prototypical linguistic areas and borrowing hierarchies, toward an integral investigation of linguistic areas. Paper presented at the Workshop on Current Issues in Areal Typology at the meeting of the DGfS (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft) in Bielefeld, Germany.
28.
Stolz, C., & Stolz, T. (1996). Funktionswortentlehnung in Mesoamerika, Spanisch-Amerindischer Sprachkontakt. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 49(1), 86-123.
29.
Stolz, C., & Stolz, T. (1997). Universelle Hispanismen? Von Manila über Lima bis Mexiko und zurück: Muster bei der Entlehnung spanischer Funktionswörter in die indigenen Sprachen Amerikas und Austronesiens. Orbis , 39(1) [ 1996-1997], 1 -77.
30.
Sæb, J.K. (2003). Presupposition and contrast: German aber as a topic particle. In Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7 (pp.257-271). Konstanz: University of Konstanz.
31.
Tenser, A. (2005, October). Convergence and contacts in Northeastern (Baltic-Russian) Romani. Presentation at the Seminar on language contact/pragmatics, University of Manchester, U.K.
32.
Thomason, S., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics . Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
Umbach, C. (2004). On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics, 21, 155-175.
34.
Umbach, C. (2005). Contrast and information structure: A focus-based analysis of but. Linguistics, 43, 207-233.
35.
Winford, D. (2003). An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
Zimmermann, K. (1987). Grammatisch bedeutsame Entlehnungen aus dem Spanischen im Otomí. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Sprachkontakts. Neue Romania, 5, 20-58.
